RFA-19: CSPP-CMIG QRIS BG (CA Dept of Education)



California Department of EducationRequest for ApplicationsFiscal Year 2019–20California State Preschool Program–California Migrant Program Quality Rating and Improvement System Block GrantCalifornia Education Code sections 8203.1, 8230–8233, 8235–8239, and 8245Subject to funding in the Budget Act of 2017Administered by theEarly Learning and Care DivisionCalifornia Department of Education1430 N Street, Suite 3410Sacramento, CA 95814-5901 Direct all fiscal year (FY) 2019–20 California State Preschool Program (CSPP)–California Migrant Program (CMIG) Quality Rating and Improvement System (QRIS) Block Grant Request for Application (RFA) inquiries and correspondence to:CSPP–CMIG QRIS Block Grant ApplicationEarly Learning and Care Division, QRIS RFA HelpdeskCalifornia Department of Education 1430 N Street, Suite 3410Sacramento, CA 95814-5901Submit all RFA questions via email to the CSPP–CMIG QRIS Block Grant email box at PSQRISBG@cde..Table of Contents TOC \o "1-3" \h \z \u Request for Applications PAGEREF _Toc5967841 \h 1I.Overview of the Quality Rating and Improvement System Block Grant PAGEREF _Toc5967842 \h 4A.Purpose PAGEREF _Toc5967843 \h 4B.Background PAGEREF _Toc5967844 \h 4C.Assumptions PAGEREF _Toc5967845 \h 7D.Funding PAGEREF _Toc5967846 \h 8II.Funding Information PAGEREF _Toc5967847 \h 9A.General Funding PAGEREF _Toc5967848 \h 9B.Funding Levels PAGEREF _Toc5967849 \h 9C.Fund Distribution PAGEREF _Toc5967850 \h 10III.Eligibility for Funding PAGEREF _Toc5967851 \h 10A.Consortia with Quality Rating and Improvement System Plans on File PAGEREF _Toc5967852 \h 10B.New Quality Rating and Improvement System Consortia PAGEREF _Toc5967853 \h 11IV.Critical Dates for the Request for Applications PAGEREF _Toc5967854 \h 12V.Application Requirements PAGEREF _Toc5967855 \h 13A.Instructions PAGEREF _Toc5967856 \h 13B.Required Application Forms PAGEREF _Toc5967857 \h 14C.Application Elements (Forms B through G) PAGEREF _Toc5967858 \h 15D.Application Requirements PAGEREF _Toc5967859 \h 15E.Budget Guidance (Refer to Form G) PAGEREF _Toc5967860 \h 18VI.Reading and Scoring for All Applicants PAGEREF _Toc5967861 \h 22A.Scoring Rubric PAGEREF _Toc5967862 \h 22B.Scoring Rubric Sections PAGEREF _Toc5967863 \h 23VII.Disqualifications for All Applicants PAGEREF _Toc5967864 \h 26VIII.Appeals for All Applicants PAGEREF _Toc5967865 \h 26IX.Program Assurances for All Applicants PAGEREF _Toc5967866 \h 27X.Appendix A. Key Terms PAGEREF _Toc5967867 \h 27XI.Appendix B. Authority PAGEREF _Toc5967868 \h 32B1. California Education Code Section 8203.1. PAGEREF _Toc5967869 \h 32B2. Federal Child Care and Development Block Grant Act PAGEREF _Toc5967870 \h 33B3. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 45, Section 98.53(a)(3) PAGEREF _Toc5967871 \h 36Overview of the Quality Rating and Improvement System Block GrantPurpose The California Department of Education (CDE), Early Learning and Care Division (ELCD) is accepting applications from county or regional consortia that operates an early care and education Quality Rating and Improvement System (QRIS). Proposition 98 funds in the amount of $50 million are appropriated for the purpose of allowing a consortium to give a site QRIS block grant to the California State Preschool Program (CSPP) sites rated at a quality level of Tier 4 or higher and to raise the quality of CSPPs not yet at Tier 4. Child Care and Development Funds (CCDF) in the amount of $800,000 is included to provide QRIS block grants for California Migrant Program (CMIG) contractors to participate in QRIS. Authority for the CCDF funding is from the Federal Child Care and Development Block Grant Act Public Law 113–186 Section 658G(b)(3) and Code of Federal Regulations, Title 45 Section 98.53(a)(3) (see Appendices B2 and B3).The CDE envisions a local consortium will use the CSPP–CMIG QRIS Block Grant to support ELCD-contracted local early learning and care programs and increase the number of low-income children in high quality state preschool and early migrant programs, thus preparing these children for success in school and life. By having more state preschool and migrant children in high quality programs over time, it is anticipated that these efforts will result in a significant reduction in the achievement gap. These funds will allow a consortium to award site block grants to CSPP–CMIG sites rated at a Tier 4 or higher. These site block grants were previously referred to as local block grants. The intent is for CSPP–CMIG sites who receive a site QRIS Block Grant to use their award funds to maintain their high QRIS rating (e.g., keeping ratios low, paying for qualified staff, supporting strong teacher-child interactions, and maintaining a quality program). It is the State’s intent that over time, all CSPP and CMIG sites will receive site QRIS Block Grants. Until that occurs, the local consortium can use a portion of the funds to raise the quality of CSPP and CMIG sites not yet at Tier 4. California Education Code (EC) Section 8203.1(g)(2) also allows a consortium to use up to 20 percent of the funds for conducting assessments of programs and providing or supporting access projects.BackgroundResearch and practice confirm that readiness and achievement disparities can be documented long before children enter kindergarten. Research also has shown us how to design high quality early learning and care programs that will enable all children to build a solid foundation for school and life success. For years we have known waiting until kindergarten is too late to begin extending educational opportunities to all children, especially children with high needs. One way California is expanding access to high quality, subsidized preschool is through support for county and regional quality improvement systems (QIS) and QRIS. On June 20, 2014, the Governor signed Senate Bill 858, the Education Omnibus Trailer Bill, authorizing the establishment of CSPP QRIS Block Grants, supported annually by $50 million in state education funds. The funding from the CSPP QRIS Block Grant provides an opportunity to build upon local and statewide successes to create sustainable capacity at the local level to meet the needs of our early learners, with a focus on those with the highest needs. These funds support local CSPP sites in established and operating quality systems. To ensure equity of access, in 2016, funds were added to include CMIG sites.California, led by the Race to the Top – Early Learning Challenge (RTT–ELC) Consortia, has worked together to ensure positive outcomes for its infants, toddlers, and preschoolers. The Consortia have built on their local efforts and investments to operate a QRIS that has research-based common quality elements across all of its members. This work is further complemented by First 5 California (F5CA) Improve and Maximize Programs so All Children Thrive (IMPACT), which is inclusive of a continuum of quality improvement efforts ranging from a single focus, such as family engagement, to a QIS that covers multiple quality elements, and finally, to a QRIS, which includes ratings and public outreach. The combined efforts of the QRIS Block Grants and F5CA IMPACT have resulted in the launching of California’s QRIS: Quality Counts California (CA) and a significant increase in participation.Quality Rating and Improvement System Site Participation from 2011 to 2018In a state where local decision-making is highly valued, Quality Counts CA attempts to better serve communities by assisting them to form greater system-wide quality and consistency among early learning programs. Participating Quality Counts CA sites agree to adopt common quality elements. The common quality elements are identified in a Quality Continuum Framework (Framework) document. In California, the Framework consists of two components: (1) The Quality Counts CA Rating Matrix and (2) the Continuous Quality Improvement Pathways Common Tools and Resources document. The Framework helps local consortia with the following: Assess child development and school readinessImprove teacher effectivenessImprove the quality and safety of learning environmentsThis Framework identifies common QRIS elements and associated research-based tools and resources. The Consortia used this Framework to identify three common tiers and created the Quality Counts CA Rating Matrix. The Framework, which includes the Quality Counts CA Rating Matrix, the Continuous Quality Improvement Pathways Common Tools and Resources document, and the supporting Quality Counts CA Implementation Guide document can be found on the CDE Quality Counts California (CA) web page at CSPP–CMIG QRIS Block Grant is intended to build on this work and raise the quality of CSPP–CMIG sites. The CDE oversees the program and ensures compliance with state standards. This grant allows the CDE to go beyond standards to achieve quality and reduce the achievement gap. The achievement gap indicates the significant discrepancy among the educational success experienced between low income and minority children compared to children who come from a higher income and are non-minority. Between 35 and 55 percent of California’s second- and third-graders are not achieving grade-level proficiency in core subjects, with even larger gaps for socioeconomically disadvantaged groups, including Latinos and African Americans, dual language learners, students whose parents have less than a postsecondary education, and students with low family incomes.The achievement gap is most notably recognized in kindergarten; early gaps in school readiness that are evident in kindergarten are mirrored in third-grade standardized test results. Kindergarteners who enter school behind are likely to remain behind as they move through the education system, and third-graders who are behind are far less likely to graduate from high school on time. Differences in language, social, and pre-mathematics skills are already apparent when children enter kindergarten. Children who start behind tend to stay behind. As of the release of this request for applications, the CDE has 44 consortia with QRIS plans on file representing 54 counties. It is anticipated with this release that the number of participating counties will increase. Assumptions The CSPP funds preschool for 200,000 three- and four-year-olds from families earning below 200 percent of the federal poverty line. California educates 13 percent of the nation’s children, and has one of the most diverse mix of preschool and child care programs. The CMIG is designed to support high quality and comprehensive educational programs for migrant children to help reduce the educational disruption and other problems that result from numerous relocations. One out of every three migrant students in the United States lives in California. In the 2015–16 school year, there were over 96,750 migrant students attending California schools during the regular school year and 42,570 students attending summer/intersession classes.The CSPP–CMIG QRIS Block Grant builds on the CSPP 50-year history of providing state preschool services to low income children. Further, as recommended in California’s Comprehensive Early Learning Plan, the CSPP–CMIG Block Grant attempts to create some system-wide quality and consistency to maximize the benefits to children and families. The CSPP–CMIG QRIS Block Grant is built on the following evidence-based assumptions and core principles:Programs with high quality environments and practices have a direct impact on brain development ensuring children are better prepared to enter kindergarten.Preschool students who attend high quality preschool programs have a higher content knowledge in language proficiency, early literacy and mathematical development.Preschool students who participate in at least one year of high quality early learning narrow the learning gap that follows students from the time they enter kindergarten through third grade and beyond.The State recognizes that communities/consortia/counties desire a system-wide focus on quality to dramatically improve outcomes and increase per child funding to pay the real cost of delivering quality service, with a corresponding increase in accountability for actually delivering quality service. The State further assumes that over time, all CSPP and CMIG sites will be participating in a local QRIS system and be rated at a Tier 4 or higher.FundingFunding in the amount of $50 million in Proposition 98 funds will be allocated for the CSPP QRIS Block Grant for 15 months from July 1, 2019, to September 30, 2020. Funding in the amount of $800,000 in CCDF will be allocated for the CMIG QRIS Block Grant for the same period as the CSPP QRIS Block Grant.Funding InformationGeneral FundingThe CSPP–CMIG QRIS Block Grant provides $50.8 million in Proposition 98 and CCDF funding, beginning July 1, 2019, through September 30, 2020. Funds are available to each applicant based on the application and proposed budget. Recipients may be considered for a renewal of their grant on an annual basis, provided they continue to meet or exceed aforementioned performance goals and the funds are allocated in the state budget.Funding for applicants is determined based on the highest October CSPP enrollment data per county of the approved applicants. Applicants with CMIG contractors within the consortia boundaries receive additional funds based on the highest month of CMIG attendance of the previous 12 months. There is no minimum or maximum grant amount for each grantee. The consortium grant amount may also vary from year to year based on the number of CSPP enrollment, CMIG attendance, and approved applicants.Each year’s grant award will depend on the availability of CSPP–CMIG QRIS Block Grant funds allocated in the state budget. The CSPP–CMIG QRIS Block Grants are ongoing, but in order to be considered for the grant, applications must be submitted and re-approved each year. Ongoing funding is not guaranteed to grantees.Note 1: Any consortium receiving CSPP–CMIG QRIS Block Grant funds is required to use the funds to supplement, and not supplant, other federal, state, and local public funds to provide programs and activities authorized under this part and other similar programs. It is expected that CSPP–CMIG Block Grant efforts would complement a consortium’s F5CA IMPACT efforts and vice versa. Any consortium utilizing the CSPP–CMIG QRIS Block Grant funds must utilize the Quality Counts CA Rating Matrix, Continuous Quality Improvement Pathways Common Tools and Resources document, and the Quality Counts CA Implementation Guide and must coordinate with other CDE Quality Projects to ensure a quality system.Note 2: At their discretion, a Consortium can elect to expend the funds over one fiscal year rather than over the 15-month grant period and can submit their final report at the end of July in order to receive their final payment. Funding Levels The Superintendent, in consultation with the executive director of the State Board, shall allocate QRIS Block Grant funds to local Consortia that satisfy the requirements of the EC Section 8203.1(e) based on the number of CSPP slots within the county or region [per the EC Section 8203.1(f)]. Consortium block grant funding levels will be determined based on the highest October CSPP enrollment data as well as the highest month’s CMIG attendance in the last 12 months per county of the approved applicants. There is no minimum or maximum grant amount. The consortium grant amount may also vary from year to year based on the number of CSPP slots, CMIG attendance, and approved applicants.Fund Distribution The grant period will cover 15 months from July 1, 2019, to September 30, 2020. Forty percent of the award shall be distributed initially, two payments of 25 percent each, and the final 10 percent will be distributed upon receipt and review of the final report. Grant extension requests must be received by April 30, 2020, for consideration. Recipients may be considered for renewal on an annual basis for subsequent years, provided that they continue to meet or exceed aforementioned performance goals and the funds are allocated in the state and federal budgets.If a grant is awarded to joint applicants, it shall be one indivisible grant. The CDE will make grant payments to the lead local educational agency (LEA).Eligibility for FundingConsortia with Quality Rating and Improvement System Plans on FileAn authorized agent is eligible to submit an application as the lead agency for the consortium in which he/she is a participant. If there are joint applicants, one must be an authorized agent. All lead agencies with an existing 2018–19 CSPP QRIS Block Grant award or 2018–19 Quality Counts California (QCC) QRIS Block Grant and who have maintained a good standing status are eligible to apply for the 2019–20 CSPP–CMIG QRIS Block Grant as a fundable applicant. Lead agencies who are not in good standing will not be considered; however, the consortium may apply with another authorized agent in good standing.All 2018–19 QRIS Block Grant award applicants in good standing must be able to meet/demonstrate all the following qualifying criteria and requirements:Demonstrate support for this CSPP–CMIG QRIS Block Grant Plan by submitting Forms B and C with the signatures of the lead agency and key consortium participants.Any Consortium who chooses to update their CSPP–CMIG QRIS Block Grant Plan, should use Form plete the CSPP–CMIG QRIS Block Grant Plan on Form E which describes the factors and amounts for determining site block plete Form E which describes how the CSPP–CMIG QRIS Block Grant funds will be used for quality improvement in order to increase the number of CSPP–CMIG providers achieving at least a Tier 4 plete Form E which describes how no more than 20 percent of the funds will be used for Assessment and Access plete the Participation Baseline and Target and Data Tables within Form F by setting ambitious yet achievable targets for CSPP–CMIG providers participating in the local QRIS with the goal of achieving Tier 4, using the most recently approved Quality Counts CA Rating Matrix. It is the State’s intent that all participating CSPP–CMIG sites will have timely access to an initial assessment and ongoing regular assessments, per the Quality Counts CA Implementation Guide which can be found on the Quality Counts California (CA) web page at Form G that corresponds to the applicant’s budget and budget narrative of the FY 2019–20 projected allocation of the CSPP–CMIG QRIS Block Grant.New Quality Rating and Improvement System ConsortiaAll applicants with a new QRIS consortium must: At the time of its submission of the Letter of Intent, demonstrate its local QRIS was operational by confirming that at least one of its participating sites has been formally rated in accordance with the Quality Counts CA Implementation Guide and utilizing the most recent version of the Quality Counts CA Rating Matrix. This shall be demonstrated by submitting documentation of a complete site rating that includes scores from each element as well as the results from a reliable external assessor on the Classroom Assessment Scoring System (CLASS) and appropriate Environment Rating Scales (ERS) tool.At the time of its submission of an application:Meet or demonstrate the qualifying criteria in item 1 and items 3 through 7 within the Consortia with Quality Rating and Improvement System Plans on File section above.Submit a description of its local QRIS plan (Form D) to the CDE ELCD in response to this RFA. In order to meet this requirement, the QRIS Block Grant Plan must also be approved by the ELCD as part of the review and scoring process.Note: Counties currently not participating in the CSPP–CMIG QRIS Block Grants also have an option to join a neighboring Consortium with a QRIS plan on file without the need of completing any further documentation other than being listed as a county on the Letter of Intent and signing the Consortium Participants.Critical Dates for the Request for ApplicationsDateCritical EventApril 16, 2019The RFA is available on the CDE Request for Applications web page at 18, 2019Webinar I will address grant questions and the application process.May 6, 2019Submission Date for Form A. Due to the CSPP–CMIG QRIS Block Grant email box at PSQRISBG@cde. before midnight.May 14, 2019 Webinar II for New QRIS Consortia. Technical assistance provided for the Consortium’s QRIS Plan. New QRIS Consortia are welcome to attend in person at the CDE.May 29, 2019Submission Date for Forms B through G. An electronic copy of the application is due to the CSPP–CMIG QRIS Block Grant email box at PSQRISBG@cde. before midnight. An original application (containing signatures on Forms B and C in blue or black ink) plus three hard copies of each signed application, must be sent to the ELCD and postmarked by May 29, 2019.May 30 – June 13, 2019The Application Review Process will use the reading process and scoring rubric specified in Section VI of the RFA.June 14, 2019The CDE will post the grant awards in an Intent to Award announcement. This is an initial notification and is not the final list of grantees. The final funding list will be posted on the CDE website when all data is verified and appeals are decided. Applicants are advised not to obligate funds based on this list.June 17 – 27, 2019Appeals must be submitted to the ELCD within 10 calendar days of the Intent to Award announcement with original signatures from the Authorized Agent. No faxed or emailed appeals will be accepted.June 28 – July 1, 2019Review of AppealsJuly 2, 2019The Final Funding List for award recipients will be posted on the CDE website.Application RequirementsInstructionsPrior to submitting an application, applicants are strongly encouraged to read the entire CSPP–CMIG QRIS Block Grant RFA and consider all requirements for eligibility.No late submissions will be accepted. Any application received after the due date and time as stated above in Section IV will be disqualified from the process.Applicants must submit the entire grant package in the order specified in the Required Application Forms section on page 14 of this RFA. The CDE will not add, delete, or replace items from the application once it has been submitted. Applicants who receive an interview may amend and resubmit their application within two business days of their interview. If any subsequent changes to an application are made, the applicant must resubmit replacement pages with the changes highlighted in yellow. Late resubmissions will not be considered, and if amendments are not submitted timely, the original application will move forward through the process.Submission InstructionsApplicants are required to submit an original application (which contains the original signatures on Forms B and C in blue or black ink) plus three hard copies of each signed application, and one electronic copy. Electronic signatures will not be accepted on the original. If there is an inconsistency between the paper and electronic copy, the original paper copy will take precedence. Applications must be printed on single-sided white paper to facilitate reading. Any application received after the due date and time will be disqualified from the competitive process. Receipt of the electronic copy on or before May 29, 2019, by midnight will satisfy the timely submission requirement. Hard copies must be sent to the ELCD and postmarked by May 29, 2019. Submit grant applications as follows:An electronic copy of the entire application (Forms B through G) must be submitted to PSQRISBG@cde..Hard copies with the original signatures must be submitted to:CSPP–CMIG QRIS Block GrantCalifornia Department of EducationEarly Learning and Care Division1430 N Street, Suite 3410Sacramento, CA 95814Jointly-Submitted ApplicationsOnly one application per county or region (multiple county consortium) will be accepted. In cases where the lead administering agency of a consortium is not a LEA, the consortium must submit a joint application signed by the consortium lead and the partnering LEA on the Letter of Intent (Form A). If a grant is awarded to joint applicants, it shall be one indivisible grant. If awarded the grant, each joint applicant will be jointly responsible for the requirements under this grant. The joint applicants must designate, in writing, the LEA who will have authority to represent them in all matters pertaining to the grant. The CDE assumes no responsibility or obligation for distribution of payment between the joint applicants.Required Application FormsThe application forms are not included in this RFA. Applicants should access Forms A through E on the Request for Applications web page at . Forms F and G will be provided to applicants with their prospective award.Form A is the Letter of Intent and must be submitted to the CSPP–CMIG QRIS Block Grant email box at PSQRISBG@cde. before midnight of May 6, 2019.Please note: New QRIS Consortia must submit documentation of a complete site rating that includes scores from each element and the results from a reliable external assessor on the CLASS and appropriate ERS tool with Form A.The content and sequence of the application will be as follows:Form B is the Lead Signature PageForm C is the Consortium ParticipantsForm D is the Consortium QRIS PlanForm E is the CSPP–CMIG QRIS Block Grant PlanForm F are the Participation Data TablesForm G are the CSPP–CMIG QRIS Block Grant FY 2019–20 Budget Narrative and Budget SpreadsheetApplication Elements (Forms B through G)The CSPP–CMIG QRIS Block Grant Plan is comprised of nine elements that applicants must thoroughly address when describing their local consortium’s QRIS. These nine elements are listed in the table below:Application ElementsApplication SectionElement ILead Signature PageElement IIConsortium ParticipantsElement IIIConsortium QRIS PlanElement IVSite CSPP–CMIG QRIS Block Grants for CSPP–CMIG Sites Rated at Tiers 4 and 5Element VQuality Improvement Process for CSPP–CMIG Sites Not Yet at Tier 4Element VIAssessment and Access ProjectsElement VIICSPP–CMIG Participation Baseline and Target and Data TablesElement VIIIBudget NarrativeElement IXBudget SpreadsheetApplication RequirementsTo be eligible for evaluation, the RFA must adhere to the following format; failure to do so may result in disqualification. Applicants must address each of the required Elements indicated below. Sections must be labeled and pages must be numbered. The application must be in the order of the CSPP–CMIG QRIS Block Grant Elements I–IX and contain all indicated sections and subsections information specified below.Element I: Lead Signature PageSignatures on Form B must be in blue or black ink, electronic signatures will not be accepted. Every consortium shall ensure that the application contains the signatures of the Consortium Local Educational Agency Lead; the Consortium Co-lead, if applicable; the Consortium F5CA IMPACT Lead Agency; QCC QRIS Block Grant Lead; and the CSPP–CMIG QRIS Block Grant Program and Fiscal Leads.Element II: Consortium ParticipantsSignatures on Form C must be in blue or black ink. Electronic signatures will not be accepted on the original. Every consortium shall ensure that the application contains the signatures of the participating local consortium representatives. When completing Form C, if the signature of a Consortium Lead is not the CSPP–CMIG QRIS Lead, then include that agency as the Co-lead on the Lead Signature Page, then on the signature line write “See Form B”.Note: Consortium participant’s signatures signify that they have read and concurred with the submitted application.The listing of additional consortium representatives of local agencies providing services to children from birth to five years of age is optional.The local consortium shall:Fill out the required information and secure stakeholder signaturesSubmit additional signature blocks to the form as neededIf applying as a multi-county consortium, the required participants for each county in the consortium must be included. Copy the Consortium Participant pages of Form C for each county’s required consortium representatives and add to your applicationElement III: Consortium Quality Rating and Improvement System PlanConsortium QRIS Plan in Form D has the following components:An Overview of the Consortium Current QRISNote: A consortium’s QRIS must utilize the Quality Counts CA Rating Matrix, Continuous Quality Improvement Pathways Common Tools and Resources document, and the Quality Counts CA Implementation Guide.Quality Continuum Framework and Tiers (Enhance and Align Standards)Rating and Assessing (Ensure Accountability)Quality Improvement Process (Create Support Improvement Strategies)Convening and Strengthening Partnerships (Build Local Consortia)Monitoring and Evaluating the Impacts on Child OutcomesDisseminating Information to Parents and the Public about Program Quality (Outreach and Communication)Note: Consortia with QRIS Plans currently on file with the CDE ELCD will receive a copy of their previously submitted Form D. Consortia can use this opportunity to update their QRIS Plan, if needed, particularly to incorporate changes due to receipt of CMIG and/or the F5CA IMPACT funding. Any changes or deletions need to be highlighted.Element IV: Site CSPP–CMIG QRIS Block Grants for CSPP–CMIG Sites Rated at Tiers 4 and 5The Site Block Grant element for CSPP and CMIG sites rated at Tiers 4 and 5 within Form E has the following components:Tier 4 Site Block GrantsTier 5 Site Block GrantsElement V: Quality Improvement Process for CSPP–CMIG Sites Not Yet at Tier 4The Quality Improvement Process element for CSPP and CMIG sites not yet at Tier 4 within Form E has the following components:EngagementImprovementElement VI: Assessment and Access ProjectsThe Assessment and Access Projects element within Form E has the following components:Assessment ProjectsAccess ProjectsElement VII: CSPP–CMIG Participation Baseline and Target and Data TablesThe CSPP–CMIG Participation Data Tables within Form F consist of the following components:Increasing the number of CSPP–CMIG sites participating in the Consortium’s Tiered QRISIncreasing the Tier Rating of CSPP–CMIG sites in the Consortium’s Tiered QRISIncreasing the number of CSPP–CMIG children who are enrolled in CSPP–CMIG sites that are in the top Tiers of the Consortium’s Tiered QRISNote: Current grantees will receive Form F prepopulated with their previous targets. Form F will be sent with the prospective award amount.Element VIII: Budget NarrativeForm G is not included in this RFA and will be provided to applicants with their prospective award amount. Additional guidance regarding the budget narrative can be found in the Budget Guidance section below.Site CSPP–CMIG QRIS Block Grants. Fill in the factors, number of sites, and the grant amounts for CSPP–CMIGs at Tiers 4 and 5.Quality Improvement Activities for CSPP–CMIGs not yet at Tier 4Assessment and Access ActivitiesElement IX: Budget SpreadsheetForm G is not included in this RFA and will be provided to applicants with their prospective award amount.Site CSPP–CMIG QRIS Block GrantsQuality Improvement ActivitiesAssessment and Access Activities are limited to no more than 20 percent of the grant amountBudget Guidance (Refer to Form G)A detailed budget narrative must be submitted with both the CSPP–CMIG QRIS Block Grant Plan and the budget spreadsheet which will be provided to applicants with their prospective award amount. Describe the cost effectiveness of the budget and how it is aligned with the program goals/objectives.Provide justification for each expenditure category and include information about roles, time base, salary of the staff and consultants, equipment specifications and justification, and a clear description of services to be contracted.Identify any funding that will be contributed by collaborative partners on either an in-kind or cash basis, and be certain to explain how it will be used in your program.The budget spreadsheet will be pre-populate with your prospective award amount. Do not attempt to modify. The total of the FY 2019–20 budget cannot exceed the grant amount.Site Block GrantsIdentify the factors, number of sites, and the grant amounts for CSPP–CMIG sites rated at Tier 4 and Tier 5. Site CSPP–CMIG QRIS Block Grants will be based on your response in Form E and the number of programs at Tiers 4 and 5 as identified in Form F. The form will calculate what your budget will be for the Site CSPP–CMIG QRIS Block Grants. The total will auto-populate within the budget spreadsheet.Quality Improvement ActivitiesThis budget narrative section has nine items: (1) Personnel, (2) Benefits, (3) Supplies, (4) Travel, (5) Equipment, (6) Contractual, (7) Training Stipends, (8) Incentives, and (9) Total Direct Costs.PersonnelExplain specific responsibilities of each position relative to the Quality Improvement Activities or functions described in Section VI. Provide:The title of each position to be compensated under this projectThe agency that funds each positionThe salary for each position under this projectThe amount of time, such as hours of percentage of time, to be expended by each position under this projectAny additional basis for cost estimates or computationsBenefitsProvide:The fringe benefit percentages for all personnel in the project by agencyThe basis for cost estimates for computationsSuppliesProvide:An estimate of materials and supplies needed for the quality improvement activities for the consortium, by nature of expense or general category (e.g., instructional materials, office supplies)The basis for cost estimates or computationsTravel subject to State travel guidelinesExplain the purpose of the travel, how it relates to project goals, and how it will contribute to project success. For example, travel expenses are calculated based on a per diem of $46 per person and a mileage rate of $.58 per mile. Provide:An estimate of the number of tripsAn estimate of transportation and/or subsistence costs for each tripAny additional basis for cost estimates or computationsEquipmentComply with definition of equipment as defined in Appendix A. Key Terms on page 27 of this RFA.Explain the justification of the need for the items of equipment to be purchased. For example, equipment is defined as tangible, non-expendable, personal property having a useful life of more than one year and an acquisition cost of $5,000 or more per unit. Provide:The type of equipment to be purchased by the consortiumThe estimate unit cost for each item to be purchasedAny additional basis for cost estimates or computationsContractualExplain the purpose and relation to the project. Provide:The products to be acquired and/or the professional services to be providedThe agency that will be responsible for the contractThe estimated cost per expected procurementFor professional services contracts, the amounts of time to be devoted to the project, including the costs to be charged to this grant awardAny additional basis for cost estimates or computationsNote: Because grantees must use appropriate procurement procedures to select contractors, applicants should not include information in their grant applications about specific contractors that may be used to provide services or goods for the proposed project if a grant is awarded, unless they are currently under contract for the same or similar purpose.Training Stipends The training stipend line item only pertains to costs associated with long-term training programs and college or university coursework that results in a credential or degree, not workshops or short-term training supported by this program.Salary stipends paid to teachers and other early learning personnel for participating in short-term professional development should be reported in personnel.Explain the purpose of the training. Provide:The agency responsible for approving and dispersing training stipendsThe cost estimates and basis for these estimatesIncentives Provide:Identify possible incentives to participating early educators and how those will be administeredTotal Direct CostsProvide:The sum of expenditures, across all budget categories in Personnel and Operations, in lines A and B of the Budget SpreadsheetAssessment and Access ProjectsThis budget narrative section has seven items: (1) Personnel, (2) Benefits, (3) Supplies, (4) Travel, (5) Equipment, (6) Contractual, and (7) Total Direct Costs. If the consortium uses these funds to support assessment and access projects, follow the guidance for the corresponding item provided in the Quality Improvement Activities section above.Indirect CostsIdentify which categories the indirect cost rate is being applied and apply the indirect cost rate. If applying an indirect cost rate of 20 percent or higher, provide justification.Total Grant Funds RequestedProvide the sum of the expenditures in line E of the Budget Spreadsheet.Reading and Scoring for All ApplicantsEach element of the CSPP–CMIG QRIS Block Grant Application responses will be reviewed for the required elements that align and support the full implementation of the proposed plan to administer, through a local consortium, a local QRIS that will increase the number of low-income children in high quality CSPP and CMIG programs that prepare those children for success in school and life.Peer reviewers will examine and approve applications with respect to each of the CSPP–CMIG QRIS Block Grant Application Elements.Applications will be randomly assigned to readers, taking into consideration any conflicts of interest. Readers will base their scores on the degree to which an application provides evidence that it meets the RFA requirements.Each application will be scored independently and will not be grouped together for any reason whether written by the same grant writer or submitted by the same agency, organization, consortium, or other entity.Applications will be evaluated by at least two reviewers. Application reviews will occur during the timeframe identified in Section IV Critical Dates for the Request for Applications on page 12 of this RFA. Applicants meeting or approaching the approval threshold may also be required to participate in an interview prior to awards being made with the CDE for an opportunity to make the necessary revisions. All applicants need to meet the approval threshold of sufficient in order to receive funding. (Refer to the Scoring Rubric below.)Scoring RubricEach section of the core application narrative will be assigned a score using the following rubric, which summarizes the required components of the CSPP–CMIG QRIS Block Grant Plan Elements of the application.The scoring system is used to signify how an application meets the funding criteria for the program. For most narrative responses, a Likert Scale from 2–6 will be used as follows:2 = Insufficient, lacks specificity4 = Sufficient, includes some specificity, but needs additional detail6 = Comprehensive, provides a clear description that includes specific detailsEach grant application will be reviewed and scored holistically by at least two readers. Readers will provide a score for each individual section. The team of readers will independently evaluate and score the applications using the scoring rubric, then meet to discuss the scores to reach consensus on the overall approval for each section. If two readers have scored the application and their scores do not fall within the same point range/category, then the two readers will recalibrate and rescore the application. Upon this second scoring, if the readers’ scores still do not fall within the same point range/category, then a third reader will score the application. The third reader’s score will be combined with one of the previous reader’s score, whichever one it is closest to/calibrated with, and averaged to determine a final score.Grant readers will be instructed to consider whether the proposed budget adequately supports the proposed program. For example, are the number of administrative staff in the budget and budget narrative appropriate? Is the operating expense budget justified and related to the planned program? Does the budget show the planned contributions from collaborative partners? How will administrative costs be divided between the LEA and a subcontractor, if applicable?Scoring Rubric SectionsThe points in each of the scoring rubric sections are the same for Consortia with QRIS plans on file and New QRIS Consortia, with the exception of Scoring Rubric Section III., the Consortium QRIS Plan. For Consortia with existing QRIS plans on file, the application elements have a maximum score of 96 points. For New QRIS Consortia applicants, the application elements have a maximum score of 237 points. The point values for each of the sections are as follows:Scoring Rubric SectionsPoint Range MaximumsLead Signature Page4Consortium Participants5Consortium QRIS PlanOverview (24)Quality Continuum Framework (9)Rating and Assessing (24)Quality Improvement Process (30)Convening and Strengthening Partnerships (24)Monitoring and Evaluating Child Outcomes (12)Disseminating Information (18)Not Applicable (N/A) for Consortia with QRIS plans on file or 141 for New QRIS Consortia ApplicantsSite CSPP–CMIG QRIS Block Grants for CSPP–CMIG Sites Rated at Tiers 4 and 5Tier 4 Site Block GrantCSPP Centers (3)CMIG Centers (N/A or 3)CSPP Family Child Care Homes (N/A or 3)CMIG Family Child Care (N/A or 3)Tier 5 Site Block GrantCSPP Centers (3)CMIG Centers (N/A or 3)CSPP Family Child Care Homes (N/A or 3)CMIG Family Child Care Homes (N/A or 3)6–24Quality Improvement Process for CSPP–CMIG Sites Not Yet at Tier 4 Engagement CSPP Centers (3)CMIG Centers (N/A or 3)CSPP Family Child Care Homes (N/A or 3) CMIG Family Child Care Homes (N/A or 3)ImprovementCSPP Centers (3)CMIG Centers (N/A or 3)CSPP Family Child Care Homes (N/A or 3) CMIG Family Child Care Homes (N/A or 3)6–24Assessment and Access ProjectsAssessment Projects (6)Access Projects (6)12CSPP–CMIG Participation Baseline and Target Data TablesIncreasing the Number of CSPP–CMIG Sites Participating in the Consortium’s Tiered QRIS (3)Increasing the Tiered Rating of CSPP–CMIG Sites in the Consortium’s Tiered QRIS (3)Increasing the Number of CSPP–CMIG Children who are Enrolled in CSPP–CMIG Sites that are in the Top Tiers of the Consortium’s Tiered QRIS (3)9Budget Narrative9Budget Spreadsheet9Total for Elements for Consortia with QRIS Plans on File60–96Total for Elements for New QRIS Consortia201–237Note: Point values reflected in Scoring Rubric Sections IV and V will vary depending on whether the applicant has a CMIG or Family Child Care Homes within their consortium.Once scored, the readers will compare the applicant’s total score to the appropriate table below to determine if the application is considered comprehensive, sufficient or minimal. If an application is considered minimal, an interview is required in order to give the applicant the opportunity to make the necessary revisions. The applicant will submit revisions within the two day allotted timeframe. The revised application is read and scored again. That score is used to determine whether the applicant has met the approval threshold for funding.Scoring Categories for Consortia with Quality Rating and Improvement System Plans on FileCategoryComprehensive 100-90% Acceptable/CompleteSufficient89-80%Acceptable/CompleteMay Require InterviewMinimal79% or lessUnacceptable/ Incomplete Interview RequiredCSPP Only60 – 5453.9 – 4847.9 or lessCSPP with CMIG or CSPP with Family Child Care Home Education Network (FCCHEN)72 – 62.162 – 55.255.1 or lessCSPP or CMIG with FCCHEN84 – 75.675.5 – 67.267.1 or lessCSPP and CMIG with FCCHEN96 – 86.486.3 – 76.876.8 or lessScoring Categories for New Quality Rating and Improvement System ConsortiaCategoryComprehensive100-90% Acceptable/CompleteSufficient89-80% Acceptable/CompleteMay Require InterviewMinimal79% or less Unacceptable/ Incomplete Interview RequiredCSPP Only201 – 180.9180.8 – 160.8160.7 or lessCSPP with CMIG or CSPP with FCCHEN213 – 191.7191.6 – 170.4170.3 or lessCSPP or CMIG with FCCHEN225 – 202.5202.4 – 180179.9 or lessCSPP and CMIG with FCCHEN237 – 213.3213.2 – 189.6or lessDisqualifications for All ApplicantsAn application will be disqualified from the RFA process if the following conditions or requirements are not met. Disqualification of an application based on these items cannot be appealed.The application must be received electronically no later than midnight on May 29, 2019. Original and hard copies of the application must be postmarked and must meet the application deadlines.Original signatures, in blue or black ink, of the CSPP–CMIG QRIS Block Grant Lead and Consortium Lead Agency, if applicable, must be present on the Form B, the Lead Signature Page. Electronic signatures will not be accepted on the original application.The CSPP–CMIG QRIS Block Grant application Forms B, C, E, F, and G must be completed in full.The Form D, the Consortium’s QRIS Plan, must be completed in full by New QRIS Consortium applicants.A county or region and all of its partnering agencies may submit only one application. Multiple applications from the same county or region will result in disqualification.Appeals for All ApplicantsApplicants who wish to appeal a grant award decision must submit a Letter of Appeal to the CDE. Appeals are limited to the grounds that the CDE failed to correctly apply the standards for reviewing the application as specified in this RFA. Appeals based on a disagreement with the professional judgment of the grant reader will not be considered.The appellant must file a full and complete written appeal, including the issue(s) in dispute, the legal authority or other basis for the appeal position. The letter must have an original signature of the Authorized Agent or the Designee. The appeal should be delivered or mailed to:CSPP–CMIG QRIS Block Grant AppealsEarly Learning and Care DivisionCalifornia Department of Education1430 N Street, Suite 3410Sacramento, CA 95814-5901The ELCD must receive the Letter of Appeal within 10 calendar days of the Intent to Award announcement.Program Assurances for All ApplicantsAll grantees are required to comply with the data and reporting requirements of this grant. Grantees are required to use the Common Data Elements. For Common Data Elements refer to the CDE Quality Counts California (CA) web page at grantees are required to retain a copy of the General Assurances for their records and audit purposes, which can be obtained at the CDE Funding Forms web page at of the signature page of the CSPP–CMIG QRIS Block Grant Application (Forms B and C) also confirms that the consortium applicant and participants have read and agreed to the assurances.Fiscal Issues:Applicants agree to follow any applicable federal or state law relating to this grant, and will meet all fiscal and auditing standards required by the CDE.Any consortium receiving CSPP–CMIG QRIS Block Grant funds is required to use the funds only for the intended purposes of this grant.Grantees are subject to semi-annual fiscal reporting.Appendix A. Key TermsTerm/Acronym ExplanationAccess ProjectsActivities that promote access to high quality early learning programs. These activities may include, but are not limited to, development and/or enhancements of QRIS web pages, resource and referral programs, waiting/eligibility lists.ApplicantLocal consortium requesting funding from a grant program administered by the CDE.Assessment ProjectsActivities that measure or rate programs. These activities include document review and on-site program reviews to determine a rating as indicated by the Quality Counts CA Rating Matrix and the Quality Counts CA Implementation Guide found on the Quality Counts California (CA) web page at AgentSuperintendent of a LEA, county office of education (COE), school district, locally-funded charter school, or administrator of a community collegePrincipal or Executive Director of a direct-funded charter schoolAuthorized executive representative of a state community collegeCalifornia State Preschool ProgramsContracted programs per the California Education Code (EC) commencing with Article 7, Chapter 2 (sections 8235–8239) and includes, for the purposes of this grant, Family Child Care Home Education Networks providing CSPP services. This includes full-day, full-year and part-day, school year programs.CDECalifornia Department of EducationCMIGCalifornia Migrant Child Care and Development Program per the EC sections 8230–8233. This program uses centers and family child care home education networks operated or administered by either public or private agencies and local educational agencies. These programs provide child development services for children from birth through 12 years of age and older children with exceptional needs. These programs provide an educational component that is culturally, linguistically, and developmentally appropriate for the children served and typically have seasonal start and stop dates.COECounty Office of EducationConsortium/ConsortiaSee local consortium.CSPPCalifornia State Preschool ProgramCSPP–CMIG QRIS Block Grant Plan and BudgetConsists of Forms E and F and describes the CSPP–CMIG targets, site block grants, specific quality improvement activities, and budget information.Early Learning Quality Rating and Improvement SystemLocally determined system for continuous quality improvement based on a tiered rating structure with progressively higher quality standards for each tier that:Provides supports and incentives for programs, teachers, and administrators to reach higher levels of quality; Monitors and evaluates the impacts on child outcomes; and Disseminates information to parents and the public about program quality. (EC Section 8203.1[b][1])ECCalifornia Education CodeELCDEarly Learning and Care Division, formerly Early Education and Support DivisionEquipment and SuppliesFollows the State’s definitions of Equipment and Supplies:“Equipment” is defined as tangible, non-expendable, personal property having a useful life of more than one year and an acquisition cost of $5,000 or more per unit. (2 Code of Federal Regulations Section 200.33)“Supplies” are defined as all tangible personal property other than equipment. (2 Code of Federal Regulations Section 200.33)Family Child Care Home Education NetworksThe networks established pursuant to the EC Section 8245 that provide CSPP services (i.e., using CSPP funds to pay for services provided to preschool-aged children and who are reported electronically on the CDD-801 to the CDE).Good StandingMeans that the grantee has done all of the following:Once the applicant has had an approved application for two years, review of the application and fiscal reporting demonstrate the following:Spent within 10 percent of the previous year’s total budgeted amountEngaged within 10 percent of the previous target numbers in Section III, andCommunicated and made rating information accessible to the publicSubmitted all required expenditure reports to the ELCD. Reports must be found to be accurate and completeSubmitted the common data elements to the Quality Counts CA in the previous September which have been found to be accurate and completeParticipating in one local QRIS across multiple funding streamsMaintained a clear contract with the ELCD, per the EC Section 8406.6 (a)(1)Operated without any outstanding CDE invoicesDoes not have outstanding or unresolved Federal Program Monitoring, Contract Monitoring Review, or Center-based Monitoring Review findings in any previous FY or any findings indicated on the grant award notification, have been determined by the ELCD to be making adequate progress toward the resolution of any findings. This also applies to any of the grantee’s contractors, subcontractors, or affiliates.Does not have outstanding or unresolved ELCD audit findings in any previous FY(s) or have been determined by the ELCD to be making adequate progress toward the resolution of any findings. This applies to any of the grantee’s contractors, subcontractors, or affiliates.GranteeAn applicant who receives an approved CSPP–CMIG QRIS grant award (Form AO-400 Grant Award Notification).IndivisibleSomething that is impossible to divide or separate; not divisible. For the purposes of this CSPP–CMIG QRIS Block grant, indivisible means that if there are two signatures (one signature in Section I and a different signature in Section II) on the Form B, Lead Signature Page, then both parties are equally responsible for the grant to be carried out as intended because it is an indivisible grant.Implementation GuideUsed to provide guidance in operating and maintaining a local QRIS that incorporates the Quality Continuum Framework and its associated Quality Counts CA Rating Matrix. The Quality Counts CA Implementation Guide is posted on the CDE’s Quality Counts California (CA) web page at Educational AgencyLocal ConsortiumLocal or regional entity, administered by a lead agency, that convenes a planning body that designs and implements a QRIS. A local consortium shall include representatives from organizations including, but not limited to, all of the following:Local educational agenciesFirst 5 county commissionsLocal postsecondary educational institutionsLocal child care planning councilsLocal resource and referral agenciesOther local agencies, including nonprofit organizations that provide services to children from birth to five years of age, inclusiveLocal QRIS Block GrantSee Site QRIS Block Grant Participation Data TablesThe baseline and target data for increasing CSPP and CMIG site participation in the local QRIS and levels of quality over time.Quality Improvement Professional Development ProjectsThe Quality Improvement Professional Development Projects refer to the efforts of the CDE ELCD Quality Improvement Office. These projects include, but are not limited to:Beginning TogetherCalifornia Collaborative for the Social-Emotional Foundations of Early LearningCalifornia Early Childhood Mentor ProgramCalifornia Early Childhood OnlineCalifornia Inclusion & Behavior Consultation NetworkCalifornia Making Access Possible to Inclusion and BelongingCalifornia Preschool Learning Foundations and California Preschool Curriculum FrameworksCalifornia Preschool Instructional NetworkDesired Results Developmental ProfileProgram for Infant/Toddler CareFor more information about these projects, go to CDE’s Professional Development Training web page at . QRISThe Quality Rating and Improvement System. See Early Learning Quality Rating and Improvement System.QRIS PlanConsists of Forms C and D of the RFA where the applicant must describe its local QRIS.Rating MatrixBlock and point system for the existing three common rating tiers.RFARequest for ApplicationsService AreaDefined as the boundaries or geographical area of the county or regional consortium where the QRIS operates.Site QRIS Block GrantFormerly referred to as “Local QRIS Block Grant.” Intended to be an award to recognize the achievement of a high standard of quality. The dispositions of the funds are to support the Tier 4 or Tier 5 CSPP and CMIG sites for activities that support and maintain quality at a Tier 4 or Tier 5.Timely and meaningful consultationTwo-way communication and discussion between the local consortium/applicant and the ELCD about the best ways to ensure that all CSPP–CMIGs in the consortium move to Tier 4 or higher.Appendix B. AuthorityB1. California Education Code Section 8203.1.(a)?The Superintendent shall administer a QRIS block grant, pursuant to an appropriation made for that purpose in the annual Budget Act, to be allocated to local Consortia for support of local early learning quality rating and improvement systems that increase the number of low-income children in high quality preschool programs that prepare those children for success in school and life.(b)?(1)?For purposes of this section, “early learning quality rating and improvement system” or “QRIS” is defined as a locally determined system for continuous quality improvement based on a tiered rating structure with progressively higher quality standards for each tier that provides supports and incentives for programs, teachers, and administrators to reach higher levels of quality, monitors and evaluates the impacts on child outcomes, and disseminates information to parents and the public about program quality.(2)?For purposes of this section, “local consortium” is defined as a local or regional entity, administered by a lead agency, that convenes a planning body that designs and implements a QRIS. A local consortium shall include representatives from organizations including, but not limited to, all of the following:Local educational agenciesFirst 5 county commissionsLocal postsecondary education institutionsLocal child care planning councilsLocal resource and referral agenciesOther local agencies, including nonprofit organizations that provide services to children from birth to five years of age, inclusive(3)?For purposes of this section, “quality continuum framework” means the tiered rating matrix created and adopted by a local consortium for purposes of implementing a QRIS. The tiered rating matrix shall include three common tiers shared by all participating local Consortia. Changes to the common tiers shall be approved and adopted by all participating local Consortia.(c)?The QRIS block grant shall build on local Consortia and other local QRIS work in existence on or before the operative date of this section.(d)?For the 2014–15 fiscal year, if a county or region has an established local consortium that has adopted a quality continuum framework, the local consortium’s lead administering agency shall be provided the first opportunity to apply for a QRIS block grant.(e)?Local Consortia shall do all of the following to be eligible for a QRIS block grant:(1)?Implement a QRIS that incorporates evidence-based elements and tools in the quality continuum framework that are tailored to the local conditions and enhanced with local resources.(2)?Set ambitious yet achievable targets for California state preschool program contracting agencies’ participation in the QRIS with the goal of achieving the highest common tier, as the tier existed on June 1, 2014, or a higher level of quality.(3)?Develop an action plan that includes a continuous quality improvement process that is tied to improving child outcomes.(4)?Describe how QRIS block grant funds will be used to increase the number of sites achieving the highest common local tier and to directly support classrooms that have achieved the highest common tier, as that tier existed on June 1, 2014, or a higher level of quality.(f)?The Superintendent, in consultation with the executive director of the State Board, shall allocate QRIS block grant funds to local Consortia that satisfy the requirements of subdivision (e) based on the number of California state preschool program slots within the county or region.(g)?(1)?Local Consortia receiving QRIS block grant funds shall allocate those funds to contracting agencies of the California state preschool program, as established by Article 7 (commencing with Section 8235), or local educational agencies, for activities that support and improve quality, and assess quality and access. In allocating the QRIS block grant funds, priority shall be given to directly supporting the classrooms of the California state preschool program sites that have achieved the highest common local tier of quality.(2)?No more than 20 percent of a local consortium’s QRIS block grant funds may be used for assessment and access projects.(h)?A family child care home education network established pursuant to Section 8245 that provides California state preschool program services shall be eligible for an allocation from a local consortium of QRIS block grant funds for activities that support, improve, and assess quality.B2. Federal Child Care and Development Block Grant ActPublic Law 113–186 Section 658G(b)(3)SEC. 658G. ACTIVITIES TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF CHILD CARE.(a) Reservation.— (1) Reservation for Activities Relating to the Quality of Child Care Services.—A State that receives funds to carry out this subchapter for a fiscal year referred to in paragraph (2) shall reserve and use a portion of such funds, in accordance with paragraph (2), for activities provided directly, or through grants or contracts with local child care resource and referral organizations or other appropriate entities, that are designed to improve the quality of child care services and increase parental options for, and access to, high quality child care, and is in alignment with a Statewide assessment of the State’s needs to carry out such services and care, provided in accordance with this subchapter.(2) Amount of Reservations.—Such State shall reserve and use—(A) To carry out the activities described in paragraph (1), not less than—(i) 7 percent of the funds described in paragraph (1), for the first and second full fiscal years after the date of enactment of the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act of 2014;(ii) 8 percent of such funds for the third and fourth full fiscal years after the date of enactment; and(iii) 9 percent of such funds for the fifth and each succeeding full fiscal year after the date of enactment; and(B) In addition to the funds reserved under subparagraph (A), 3 percent of the funds described in paragraph (1) received not later than the second full fiscal year after the date of enactment and received for each succeeding full fiscal year, to carry out the activities described in paragraph (1) and subsection (b)(4), as such activities relate to the quality of care for infants and toddlers.(3) State Reservation Amount.—Nothing in this subsection shall preclude the State from reserving a larger percentage of funds to carry out the activities described in paragraph (1) and subsection (b).(b) Activities.—Funds reserved under subsection (a) shall be used to carry out no fewer than one of the following activities that will improve the quality of child care services provided in the State:(1) Supporting the training and professional development of the child care workforce through activities such as those included under section 658E(c)(2)(G), in addition to—(A) Offering training and professional development opportunities for child care providers that relate to the use of scientifically-based, developmentally-appropriate and age-appropriate strategies to promote the social, emotional, physical, and cognitive development of children, including those related to nutrition and physical activity, and offering specialized training for child care providers caring for those populations prioritized in section 658E(c)(2)(Q), and children with disabilities;(B) Incorporating the effective use of data to guide program improvement;(C) Including effective behavior management strategies and training, including positive behavior interventions and support models, that promote positive social and emotional development and reduce challenging behaviors, including reducing expulsions of preschool-aged children for such behaviors;(E) Providing training and outreach on engaging parents and families in culturally and linguistically appropriate ways to expand their knowledge, skills, and capacity to become meaningful partners in supporting their children’s positive development;(F) Providing training corresponding to the nutritional and physical activity needs of children to promote healthy development;(G) Providing training or professional development for child care providers regarding the early neurological development of children; and(H) Connecting child care staff members of child care providers with available Federal and State financial aid, or other resources, that would assist child care staff members in pursuing relevant postsecondary training.(2) Improving upon the development or implementation of the early learning and developmental guidelines described in section 658E(c)(2)(T) by providing technical assistance to eligible child care providers that enhances the cognitive, physical, social and emotional development, including early childhood development, of participating preschool and school-aged children and supports their overall well-being.(3) Developing, implementing, or enhancing a tiered quality rating system for child care providers and services, which may—(A) Support and assess the quality of child care providers in the State;(B) Build on State licensing standards and other State regulatory standards for such providers;(C) Be designed to improve the quality of different types of child care providers and services;(D) Describe the safety of child care facilities;(E) Build the capacity of State early childhood programs and communities to promote parents’ and families’ understanding of the State’s early childhood system and the ratings of the programs in which the child is enrolled;(F) Provide, to the maximum extent practicable, financial incentives and other supports designed to expand the full diversity of child care options and help child care providers improve the quality of services; and(G) Accommodate a variety of distinctive approaches to early childhood education and care, including but not limited to, those practiced in faith-based settings, community-based settings, child-centered settings, or similar settings that offer a distinctive approach to early childhood development.B3. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 45, Section 98.53(a)(3)§98.53 Activities to improve the quality of child care.(a) The Lead Agency must expend funds from each fiscal year's allotment on quality activities pursuant to §§98.50(b) and 98.83(g) in accordance with an assessment of need by the Lead Agency. Such funds must be used to carry out at least one of the following quality activities to improve the quality of child care services for all children, regardless of CCDF receipt, in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section:(1) Supporting the training, professional development, and postsecondary education of the child care workforce as part of a progression of professional development through activities such as those included at §98.44, in addition to:(i) Offering training, professional development, and postsecondary education opportunities for child care caregivers, teachers and directors that:(A) Relate to the use of scientifically based, developmentally-appropriate, culturally-appropriate, and age-appropriate strategies to promote the social, emotional, physical, and cognitive development of children, including those related to nutrition and physical activity; and(B) Offer specialized training, professional development, and postsecondary education for caregivers, teachers and directors caring for those populations prioritized at §98.44(b)(2)(iv), and children with disabilities;(ii) Incorporating the effective use of data to guide program improvement and improve opportunities for caregivers, teachers and directors to advance on their progression of training, professional development, and postsecondary education;(iii) Including effective, age-appropriate behavior management strategies and training, including positive behavior interventions and support models for birth to school-age, that promote positive social and emotional development and reduce challenging behaviors, including reducing suspensions and expulsions of children under age five for such behaviors;(iv) Providing training and outreach on engaging parents and families in culturally and linguistically appropriate ways to expand their knowledge, skills, and capacity to become meaningful partners in supporting their children's positive development;(v) Providing training corresponding to the nutritional and physical activity needs of children to promote healthy development;(vi) Providing training or professional development for caregivers, teachers and directors regarding the early neurological development of children; and(vii.) Connecting child care caregivers, teachers, and directors with available Federal and State financial aid that would assist these individuals in pursuing relevant postsecondary education, or delivering financial resources directly through programs that provide scholarships and compensation improvements for education attainment and retention.(2) Improving upon the development or implementation of the early learning and development guidelines at §98.15(a)(9) by providing technical assistance to eligible child care providers in order to enhance the cognitive, physical, social, and emotional development and overall well-being of participating children.(3) Developing, implementing, or enhancing a tiered quality rating and improvement system for child care providers and services to meet consumer education requirements at §98.33, which may:(i) Support and assess the quality of child care providers in the State, Territory, or Tribe;(ii) Build on licensing standards and other regulatory standards for such providers;(iii) Be designed to improve the quality of different types of child care providers and services;(iv) Describe the safety of child care facilities;(v) Build the capacity of early childhood programs and communities to promote parents' and families' understanding of the early childhood system and the rating of the program in which the child is enrolled;(vi) Provide, to the maximum extent practicable, financial incentives and other supports designed to expand the full diversity of child care options and help child care providers improve the quality of services; and(vii.) Accommodate a variety of distinctive approaches to early childhood education and care, including but not limited to, those practiced in faith-based settings, community-based settings, child centered settings, or similar settings that offer a distinctive approach to early childhood development. ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download