CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, LONG BEACH
AGENDA
MEETING 7
February 10, 2011 2:00-4:00 p.m.
Towner Auditorium - PSY 150
1. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 2:03pm
2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Chair Vollendorf moved to strike the words “time certain: 2:35 pm” from item 7.2. Chair Vollendorf moved unanimous approval of the amended agenda. There being no objection the agenda was approved.
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Academic Senate Minutes of December 9, 2010
The approval of the minutes of the previous meeting was moved and seconded.
The vote was
Yeas: 38
Nays: 0
Abstentions: 2
Hanging Chad: 1
The minutes were approved.
4. REPORTS OF STANDING COMMITTEES AND COUNCILS
1. Executive Committee
1. Report from the Chair
Chair Vollendorf reported that the Executive Committee was in the process of reviewing the Senate Rules and Regulations to clarify them and make them more consistent with current practice. In light of the recent discussion and vote on the format of the Senate minutes, Chair Vollendorf asked the Senate to waive section 5.8.3, which prohibits the tape recording of Senate meetings, to allow the Assistant to the Chair to record the meetings to assist in the preparation of the Minutes.
In response to Senator Kearney’s request for specific language, Senator Hood moved to “waive section 5.8.3 of the Senate Rules & Regulations until such time as revised Rules and Regulations are approved by the Senate.” The motion was seconded.
In response to a question by Senator Hamano, Senator Fradella confirmed that all statements during Senate meetings are “on the record.” The only time minutes are not kept is when the Senate goes in to Executive Session and that is only legally allowed in very limited cases involving personnel issues.
Senator Chun moved to amend the motion to require the deletion of the recording after minutes are approved. The amendment was accepted as friendly.
Senator Vogel moved to call the question.
The vote on the motion was:
Yeas: 56
Nays: 3
Abstentions: 2
2. Announcements
2. Nominating Committee: Flora Banuett, Chair
Senator Banuett, Chair of the Nominating Committee, moved the following nominations. All nominations were seconded:
• IEC: Chris Druzgalski (COE) as sabbatical replacement for Antonella Sciortino for the Spring 2011 semester.
Chair Vollendorf moved unanimous approval. There being no objections the nomination was approved.
• ULC: Yuan (Judy) Yin (CBA) as midterm replacement for Xuemei (Sherry) Su. Term ending in 2012
Chair Vollendorf moved unanimous approval. There being no objections the nomination was approved.
• UAC: Jane Dabel (CLA), 2007-8 Recipient of the Faculty Teaching Award
• UAC: Praveen Soni (CBA) 2006-2007 Recipient of the Faculty Teaching Award, 2008-9 Recipient of the Nicholas Perkins Hardeman Award
• UAC: Anastasios Chassiakos, 2003-4 Recipient of the Distinguished Scholarly & Creative Achievement Award.
Chair Vollendorf moved unanimous approval. There being no objections the nominations were approved.
• PPR: Hugh O’Gorman (COTA) Term ending 2014
• PPR: Heloiza Herscovitz (CLA) Term ending 2014
• PPR: Valerie McKay (CLA) Term ending 2014
• PPR: Sarah Schrank (CLA) Term ending 2014
• PPR: Martine Van Elk (CLA) Term ending 2014
• PPR: Ping Lin (CBA) Term ending 2014
• PPR: Elizabeth Eldon (CNSM) Term ending 2014
Chair Vollendorf moved unanimous approval. There being no objections the nominations were approved.
1. Consent Calendar
1. Obsolescence of Policy 75-12 Graduate Degree and Admission, Implementation of Trustee-Approved (AS-828-10/CEPC)-SECOND READING
There being no motion to remove the item from the Consent Calendar, the item received its second reading was approved by the Senate.
2. New Minor in Event Management and Planning (AS-825-10/CEPC/URC)-SECOND READING
Senator Kearney questioned whether the correct version of the New Minor in Event Management and Planning had been uploaded to the website. In light of these questions, Senator Janousek moved to remove the item from the Consent Calendar. The item received its first reading and will be considered for a second reading at the next Senate meeting.
5. REPORT OF SPECIAL COMMITTEES: None
6. SPECIAL ORDERS
1. Report of the President (2:05–2:20 p.m. TIME CERTAIN)
President Alexander reported that it seemed likely that there would be a special election to consider the extension of existing taxes. If the extension is not approved the consequences for the CSU could be dire. The current cuts under the Governor’s Budget are very severe as it is. Planning is going forward and difference scenarios are being developed. Despite the statements of some politicians, he dared anyone to find a more efficiently run university by any measure.
On a more positive note, Cal Grants are protected in the Governor’s current budget. Also our Endowment has recovered from the economic downturn and has reached a new record high. Much of this money is set aside for student scholarships. He thanked the University’s Development staff for their hard work.
As far as the outlook from Washington, Federal Stimulus funds and Maintenance of Effort provisions have helped us for the last two years, but following the midterm elections we can expect little further help from Washington. Earmarks, which often fund higher education projects, are a delicate political issue at the moment. We are working with CSSA to try and protect Pell grants and other forms of federal student aid.
In response to a question by Senator Garcia, the President reported that Fall enrollment was expected to be flat with only a 1-2% increase. It is just as well that we did not meet our Spring enrollment goals since the funding to support them never materialized. Admissions letters for Fall have already been sent out. If the tax extensions are not approved in June we may have to shut down January 2012 admissions.
Senator Moreno asked about the impact of the budget situation on faculty hiring. Provost Para responded that the University was consulting with other CSU’s and the Chancellor’s Office. At this time the University hopes to fill 22 of 27 openings in Fall 2011, 10 in Fall 2012 and 13 in Fall 2013. The University currently has 8 unfilled MPP positions.
In response to a question by Senator Garcia, President Alexander reported that each CSU has been allowed to can choose whether its summer school will be self-support or state support. CSULB will be going with the self-support option, but we have set some funds aside for student aid.
2. CFA Report: CFA President Teri Yamada (2:20-2:30 p.m. TIME CERTAIN)
CFA President Yamada had no news to report on the status of contract negotiations. She urged her audience to vote in June and to encourage their students, family and friends to vote for the tax extensions.
She informed the Senate of the following CFA events;
• 3/16 (Wed. at 12 noon, Anatol Center): AAUP Gary Rhoades “National Crisis in Public Higher Education”
• 4/12 (Tues at 12 noon, Speakers Platform area) Rally for Quality Higher Education
o (5 pm, Anatol Center)Collective Bargaining update
• 5/3 (Tues at 12 noon, Chartroom). Lunch with Mike Rose and Deborah Harrington.
7. OLD BUSINESS (TIME CERTAIN: 3:00 p.m.)
1. Discontinuance of the M.A. in Occupational Studies-SECOND READING
No action was taken on the policy. The second reading will be considered at a future Senate meeting.
2. Department Chairs Policy (AS-AS-806-09/FPPC)-SECOND READING
Senator Schürer withdrew his amendment to strike the last line of section 5.2 (“A faculty member may cast an affirmative vote for more than one candidate.”)
Senator O’Connor moved to strike the last line of section 5.2. The motion was seconded. Chair Vollendorf moved unanimous consent of the amendment. There being no objection the amendment to strike the last sentence of section 5.2 was approved.
Senator Schürer moved to add the following to the end of section 5.3. “In addition each department may place on the same ballot additional types of electoral methods such as, but not limited to, single votes or ranking.” The motion was seconded.
Senator Schürer said that the policy as it now stands provides uniformity in requiring that chair candidates be “recommend” or “not recommended” by their department, but that each department should be allowed to select its own method of indicating preference among recommended candidates.
Supporters of the amendment stated that it would allow departments, at their own option, to express a preference if there is more than one recommended candidate. Opponents of the amendment, including FPPC Chair/Senator Fisher, stated that it added unnecessary complexity to the policy. Questions were raised as whether this amendment would necessitate the adoption of constitutions by departments that currently do not have one. There was also discussion about meaning of “balloting methods.” The term could mean type of election or balloting procedures.
Senator Fradella moved to call the question. The motion was seconded by Senator Hood. There being no objection, the amendment was put to a vote.
The result of the vote on the amendment was:
Yea: 22
Nay: 30
Abstain: 3
The amendment failed.
The Senate began consideration of the first of the three proposed amendments to section 5.4
Senator Francis’ amendment to strike “number of acceptable votes” after the word “results” was moved by Senator Vogel in Senator Francis’ absence. The motion was seconded and Senator Vogel spoke to the amendment. She stated that the additional language was an unnecessary complication to the policy.
Senator Fisher stated that he had no problem with amendment.
After a brief discussion on the procedure for dealing with multiple proposed amendments to the same section, Senator Kearney moved to call the question. The motion was seconded. There being no objections the proposed amendment was put to a vote.
The results of the vote were:
Yeas: 34
Nays: 11
Abstentions: 4
The amendment was passed and “the number of acceptable votes” was struck.
Senator O’Connor moved to amend section 5.4 to insert “and may rank the recommended candidates” at the end of the section.
Interim Dean Kvapil stated that vote totals would indicate the rankings of candidates.
Senator Fisher objected to the amendment on the grounds that it would add unnecessary complications though he understood the desire to indicate a preference in the case of a tie between two or more recommended candidates.
Chair Vollendorf asked Senator O’Connor if the amendment referred to voting procedures or the reporting of results. Senator O’Connor observed that the structure of the document had changed since the amendment was first introduced.
On the advice of Senate Secretary Fradella, Chair Vollendorf ruled the amendment out order and, with consent of the motion maker, the amendment was moved to section 5.2, which deals to with voting procedures rather the reporting (section 5.4).
Discussion resumed.
AVP Harbinger felt that the amendment, if passed, would create problems of implementation and interpretation. Supporters of the amendment stated that it would allow for the expression of a preference from among recommended candidates.
Senator Forrest called for a quorum count. There being only 31 voting members present, and 42 being required for a quorum, the meeting was adjourned.
8. NEW BUSINESS (TIME CERTAIN: 2:45 p.m.)
1. Requirements for the Master’s Degree-FIRST READING (AS-821-10/CEPC)
The first reading was moved, seconded and Professor Brazier, chair of the CEPC spoke to it. The goal of the policy was to create a unified policy that reflected current practice. Significant changes included
• Catalogs rights would begin on admission rather than at advancement to candidacy.
• The policy clarifies disqualification policy for graduate students.
• The policy allow for a reasonable number of transfer units.
In response to a question by Senator Del Casino, Vice-Provost Lindsay responded that the question of how many times a graduate student may attempt a course will be addressed in a new repeat/delete policy. Senator Del Casino suggested that any new policy allow departments to determine the number of possible repeats.
Professor Brazier also informed the Senate that the new policy would require more courses intended primarily for graduate students in line with directives from the Chancellor’s Office. The Senate discussed the impact of this change on classes currently coded as 400/500. The changes would require offering additional graduate level courses and concerns were expressed about finding the funding and resources to implement the new policy given the current budget crisis.
Other sections of the policy dealt with the minimum number of units with 3.0 GPA, the ability of departments to set up additional criteria of competence, and department control of grading policy.
The policy also mandated that a first masters program must be completed before a second masters program can be started. In response to a question by Interim Dean Kvapil, Professor Brazier emphasized that the policy did not affect programs set up to provide dual majors such as the existing MBA/MFA program. Interim Dean Kvapil also expressed concern over wording in the document which seemed to give authority over graduate students to the entire department as opposed to the graduate committee. Lack of clarity on this issue could be very damaging if a department fight developed over a graduate student.
In response to a question by Senator Behl about the seven year rule, Vice-Provost Lindsay responded that there would be no changes.
Senator Schürer asked about implementation timetables given the new requirements and limited resources.
Senator Forrest moved to table the policy until the Senate had received more clarification and feedback on its stated concerns. Chair Vollendorf informed the Senate that a policy cannot be tabled on its first reading, but it can be tabled or referred back to the council on its second reading.
There being no objection, the policy received first reading.
2. Policy on Course Syllabi and Standard Course Outlines-FIRST READING (AS-839-10/CEPC)
No action was taken on the policy. The first reading will be considered at a subsequent meeting.
9. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 3:51 pm due to the lack of a quorum.
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related searches
- california state university system
- california state university second bachelor s
- california state university tuition
- california state university jobs
- california state university system schools
- california state university system wiki
- california state university application log in
- california state university campuses list
- california state university log in
- california state university application deadline
- california state university tuition fee
- california state university fees