Pmg-assets.s3-website-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com



NATIONAL ASSEMBLY:QUESTION NUMBER: 2133Mr M S F de Freitas (DA) to ask the Minister of Transport:(1)With reference to (a) his department and (b) all the entities reporting to him, (i) what number of legal matters have been dealt with in each of the past three financial years and (ii) what are the details of the specified matters in each case;(2)With regard to the matters that were initiated by his department and/or entities reporting to him and another party, on what date was each matter launched and concluded in each instance;(3)(a) What number of matters are still outstanding, (b) what are the relevant details of the matters and (c) why are they still outstanding in each case;(4)What amount has been (a) budgeted in respect of each financial year and (b) spent on each matter in each financial year?NW2288EREPLY : REPLY : 1 (a) (i)2015/2016(11 matters)2016/2017(19 matters)2017/2018(12 matters)1(a)(ii) Details of the specified matters in each case MATTERSDETAILS15/1616/1717/18DOT/Bowman/Ngidi and MorarProceedings to recover amounts paid to consultants without following procurement proceduresxxxTasima/ DOT, RTMCApplication by Tasima to enforce court orders, DOT and RTMC brought counter application to declare 2010 contract extension unlawful xxxProdiba/DOTCounter application by DOT to declare the 2010 contract extension unlawful xxCentral African Road Services / Minister of Transport and CBRTAReview application to set aside the promulgations of the 2014 permit tariffsxxRoad Freight Association / Minister of Transport and CBRTAReview application to set aside the promulgations of the 2014 permit tariffsxxMarine Enquiry KingfisherMarine court of enquiry on the sinking of the Kingfisher boat in Port Elizabeth leading to loss of lives xxDOT/HlabisaCharges related to over payment made on provincial road maintenance grant. A final written warning was given.xxDOT/VilanaCharges related to breach of supply chain processes, misuse of authority, and his decision on the appointment of the service provider related to the investor conference. He opted to resign.xxDOT/ThwalaDisciplinary proceedings on the unlawful extension of the eNatis contract. Found guilty and has brought a review application to the labour courtxxxMEC for Transport KZN/ Transport Appeal TribunalChallenge of the decisions of the Transport Appeal Tribunal to set aside the decisions of the Provincial Regulatory Entity xxJV Ndorum/ Minister of Transport, Finance, Defence, Transport Eastern CapeSummons by JV Ndorum for payment of extra works conducted at the Mthatha Airport xxxCity of Cape Town / SANRAL & Minister of TransportReview application by the City of Cape Town on the approval of tolling of the N1/2 Winelands toll routes xxLevers Mabaso/DOTApplication to set aside the process followed in appointing the Chief Director?: Legal ServicesxxxMarine Enquiry WitbankMarine Court of enquiry on the sinking of a boat at the Witbank Dam that led to loss of livesxxPopo Molefe / PRASA & Minister of TransportApplication to set aside the decision of the Minister to dismiss the Board of PRASAxxJinja Outdoor Advertising / SANRAL & DOTApplication to set aside the decision of SANRAL to remove a bill board over the N1 highwayxx#Unite Behind and Equal Education / Minister of Transport and PRASAApplication to set aside the decision of the Minister to appoint an interim Board of PRASAxxSelepe / DOTApplication to set aside the decision of the Minister not to confirm the probation period of Mr Selepe xxAfrican Harvest/ Regulating CommitteeApplication to challenge the fixing of tariff permits xAfrican Harvest / Minister of Transport and ACSAApplication to compel the Minister of Transport and ACSA to purchase the shares of the Minority shareholders in ACSA2. The matter of DOT against Bowman, Ngidi and Morar inc was instituted on 15 March 2016 and it has not been concluded as yet, as the court process is still underway. 3. (a)Six (6) matters are still outstandingMatter(b) Details(c) StatusDOT/Bowman, Ngidi and MorarProceedings to recover amounts paid to consultants without following procurement proceduresThe matter is still progressing DOT/ThwalaDisciplinary proceedings on the unlawful extension of the eNatis contract. Found guilty and has brought a review application to the labour courtAwaiting hearing dateSelepe/DOTApplication to set aside the decision of the Minister not to confirm the probation period of Mr SelepePreparation of answering affidavitsAfrican Harvest/Minister of Transport and ACSAApplication to compel the Minister of Transport and ACSA to purchase the shares of the Minority shareholders in ACSAThe matter is still progressing#Unite Behind and Equal Education/Minister of Transport and PRASAApplication to set aside the decision of the Minister to appoint an interim Board of PRASAThe matter is still progressingJV NdorumSummons by JV Ndorum for payment of extra works conducted at the Mthatha AirportThe matter is still progressing 4. (a)The following amounts were budgeted for each financial year2015/2016 (R9 364,000.00)2016/2017 (R9 500,000.00)2017/2018 (R8 986,000.00) (b)Total spent on each matterMatter2015/20162016/20172017/2018DOT/ Bowman, Ngidi and MorarR82, 560.00R81, 795.00Tasima/ DOT, RTMCR6, 694, 560.56R8, 510, 948.47R922, 637.46Prodiba/DOTR102, 600.00R37, 620.00Marine Enquiry KingfisherR2, 293, 858.79R82 000.00DOT/HlabisaR141, 900.00R137, 500.00DOT/VilanaR297, 225.00R337, 325.25DOT/ThwalaR755, 410.10R1, 743, 883.60R348, 700.00MEC for Transport KZN/ Transport Appeal TribunalR232, 862.83R673, 356. 26JV Ndorum/ DOT, Finance, Defence, Transport Eastern CapeR139, 878.00R137, 500.00R107, 217.00City of Cape Town / SANRAL & DOTR837, 501.00R517, 389.00Levers Mabaso/DOTR56, 943.00R96, 444.00Marine Enquiry WitbankR3, 640, 159.14African Harvest / Minister of Transport and ACSAR445, 657.00R2, 427, 744.00Popo Molefe / PRASA & Minister of TransportR98 000.00R588, 282.00Jinja Outdoor Advertising / SANRAL & DOTR86 782.50#Unite Behind & Equal Education / Minister of Transport & PRASA Selepe / DOTR157, 263.00)R273, 703.00African Harvest/ Regulating CommitteeR485, 469.00Central African Road Services / Minister of Transport and CBRTAR235, 367.00R349, 483.79)Road Freight Association / Minister of Transport and CBRTAR124, 254.00R87, 425.98)Airports Company South Africa SOC Limited (ACSA)(1) (a) Not Applicable to ACSA (b)(i) In the past three financial years ACSA has dealt with 36 (Thirty Six) litigation matters. (ii) Please see attached spreadsheet. Please note that the current members of the legal team have only been with ACSA for a period of 1 year 3 months at most. This report is therefore limited to the matters which they have dealt with and those where information has been readily available. There could therefore be litigation matters which are not included herein due to the fact that there is no information that is available on these matters.(2) Please see annexed spreadsheet.(3) Please see annexed spreadsheet.(4) (a) The amounts budgeted in respect of each financial year are as follows: - 2015/ 2016- R9?000,000 2016/2017- R11?000,000 2017/2018- R21?000,000 (b) The amounts spent on legal expenses for the past three financial years are as follows: 2015/2016- R 22?147?8332016/ 2017- R 30?106?8552017/ 2018 - R 46?646?308The legal expenses for the financial year 2017/ 2018 also include the expenses on the debt collection matters which the legal department has taken over from FinOps.Air Traffic and Navigation Services SOC Limited (ATNS)(i) Seven. (ii) (a) ATNS / Ndlovu?: Urgent Application for dismissal /Interdict of Internal Disciplinary Process.ATNS / Ndlovu?: Review Application to interdict the disciplinary hearing and appointment of the Chairperson of the Hearing,ATNS/Motsogi?: Review Application of the CCMA Arbitration ruling in relation to ATA theft of assessment papers,ATNS/Ndlovu?: to review the decision of the board to remove Mr. Ndlovu as the Board Director of ATNS,ATNS/T Mofuledu?: Fraud. ATNS/ S Khan Recovery/ Breach of training Contract.(2) (a) ATNS / Ndlovu?: Urgent Application for dismissal /Interdict of Internal Disciplinary Process?: 2018. ATNS / Ndlovu?: Review Application to interdict the disciplinary hearing and appointment of the Chairperson of the Hearing?: 2018. ATNS/Motsogi?: Review Application of the CCMA Arbitration ruling in relation to ATA theft of assessment papers?: 2018. ATNS/Ndlovu?: to review the decision of the board to remove Mr. Ndlovu as the Board Director of ATNS?: 2018. ATNS/T Mofuledu?: Fraud?: 2015. ATNS/ S Khan Recovery/ Breach of training Contract?: 2015.(3) (a) Seven (b) (c) - ATNS / Ndlovu: Urgent Application for dismissal /Interdict of Internal Disciplinary Process: 2018?: The Parties are currently exchanging pleadings. Once this is finalised, the matter may be set down for hearing. The matter was postponed on 26 April 2018 to provide the Applicant (Mr. Ndlovu) to file his responding Affidavit. He argued that he was unable to respond to the Affidavit. The disciplinary hearing has been finalised which led to the employee being dismissed and the termination letter was handed to him on 25 May 2018.ATNS / Ndlovu?: Review Application to interdict the disciplinary hearing and appointment of the Chairperson of the Hearing?: 2018?: The Parties are currently exchanging pleadings. Once this is finalised, the matter may be set down for hearing.Notice of Intention to Oppose has been filed.ATNS/Motsogi?: Review Application of the CCMA Arbitration ruling in relation to ATA theft of assessment papers?: 2018?: The Parties are currently exchanging pleadings. Once this is finalised, the matter may be set down for hearing. Notice of intention to oppose has been filed. ATNS/Ndlovu?: to review the decision of the board to remove Mr. Ndlovu as the Board Director of ATNS?: 2018?: The Parties are currently exchanging pleadings. Once this is finalised, the matter may be set down for hearing.ATNS/T Mofuledu?: Fraud?: 2015?: There is a criminal and civil charge against the defendant. On 10 March 2017 the defendant cannot be found at the last known address as a result he cannot be served. The defendant will only be served upon his arrest.ATNS/ S Khan Recovery/ Breach of training Contract?: 2015?: Matters has been settled in Court in the amount of R85000.00.(4)(a) Financial YearActualBudget2017/18 3 247 189 5 000 000 2016/17 3 932 315 8 637 289 2015/16 7 979 519 6 950 000(b) ATNS / Ndlovu: R312 115.20.ATNS/ NDLOVU: R154 477.97.ATNS / MOTSOGI: Not Yet Invoiced.ATNS/ MOFULEDU: R27300.00 and R44 118.00.ATNS/ S KHAN: R103 466.80.South African Civil Aviation Authority (SACAA)(1) (a) is not applicable. For questions (1) (b), (i) and (ii); (2); (3) (a), (b) and (c); (4) (a) and (b) please refer to ANNEXURE A: SACAA Response to National Assembly Question Number: 2133 by Mr M SF de Freitas (DA) on Legal Matters Instituted Against and by the SACAA. Railway Safety Regulator (RSR)(i)Five legal matters have been dealt with by the RSR.(ii)The details of the matters are as follow:BMW vs RSR, 2015The matter was a review application against the decision of the Board and RSR on the reduction of the permit validity period of the operators and lack of consultations with operators. The RSR defended the matter at the High Court and it was concluded in April 2017, with the order in favour of the RSR.Sefora Kutumela vs RSR and Others, 2015Review application by the applicant against an award of the CCMA confirming dismissal of the applicant by the RSR. Matter was lodged at the Labour Court. The matter appears to have been abandoned by the employee as it was never set down for review after the last court sitting in November 2015.Gumede and others vs RSR, 2015Litigation was initiated by the plaintiffs in a claim against the RSR for failure to vacate the premises rented in Bruma on time and effecting necessary reperations. The matter was settled out of court in April 2016.Intengu Communications vs RSR, 2016The complainant filed an arbitration complaint against the RSR claiming an amount of R505,030-27 for services rendered for the Women in Rail Conference which Intengu alleges they have performed. The RSR defended the matter at the arbitration proceedings and the complainant subsequently withdrew the dispute and the matter was settled between the parties in April 2018.Transnet SOC Ltd vs RSR, 2016Transnet lodged an urgent application against RSR following an unsuccessful permit application. The matter proceeded in court and the application by Transnet was dismissed.The RSR has not launched any legal matters against any party.All matters have been concluded. There is currently no active litigation against the RSR.The amount budgeted and spent for each financial year is as follow:Financial YearAmount budgetedAmount spent2015/2016R3,000,000-00 R699,767-502016/2017R2,000,000-00 R1,105,089-002017/2018R1,000,000-00 R717,143-00Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa (PRASA)(i) The number of legal matters that have been dealt with in each of the financial years are:2015/16 – 25 matters2016/17 – 40 matters2017/18 – 52 matters(ii) The matters listed below are matters in respect of which the counter party mentioned has ommenced legal proceedings either in court or through alternative dispute resolution, for example, arbitration proceedings. Note that this list exludes items where PRASA initiated legal matters.Year(ii) Details of matters15/1616/1717/18Prodigy Business ServicesClaiming for alleged failure to pay for services rendered.XXBagale Consulting Claiming for alleged failure to pay for services rendered during 2010.XXXLabour disputes, Including mass dismissal dispute by National Transport Movement.XXXRail & Road Assessing Services Application was launched for dismissal of action.XXXLenkwane Cleaning Services For alleged breach of contract.XXXProconse Consulting Engineers For alleged failure to pay for services rendered.XXXVarious insurance claims For personal injuriesXXXBombardier Africa Alliance - Delay claims allegedly occasioned by a change request and a NUMSA strike.XXXAlgee Medics and Fire For alleged failure to pay for services rendered.XXXTiro Projects - Claim for alleged failure to pay for professional services rendered.XXXME Mlungisi.Alleged unlawful arrestXXXNational Force Security For alleged unlawful cancellation of security contract.XXXTransportation and Traffic Technology Africa For alleged failure to pay for professional services rendered.XXXMadisha & Associates - Claim for alleged breach of contract.XXXBaran Projects SA - Claim for alleged failure to pay for goods sold and delivered.XXXKoor Dindar Moti Quantity Services - Claim for alleged failure to pay for services rendered / work performed.XXXThe New Age - Claim for alleged failure to pay for goods sold and delivered.XXXSbahle Safety consultants For alleged failure to pay for services rendered.XXXBe My Guest Trading For alleged failure to pay for services rendered.XXXRasakanya Builders CC - Claim for alleged failure to pay for cleaning services rendered.XXXBusiness Pledge - Claim for alleged failure to pay in terms of an agreement.XXXPhumelela Fleet Operations (Pty) Ltd - Claim for alleged failure to pay services rendered, viz Vehicle Management Tracking System.XXXEnterprise Technology Solutions (Pty) Ltd - Declaratory order setting aside cancellation of rental and loan of certain equipment agreement.XXXSiyaya Rail Solutions - Claim for alleged failure to pay for professional services rendered.XXXDaveglen 371 (Pty) Ltd t/a Security International - Claim in respect of Statutory increases determined by the Security Industry. XXSiyaya db Consulting Engineers - Claim for alleged failure to pay for services rendered.XXEE Meishwine vs Autopax, Claiming for loss of support.XXMadisha & Associates CC - Alleged early termination of contract.XXRaamba Engineering Enterprises CC and JRACCE (PTY) LTD - Subcontractor workXXDBI - Change in scope and budget.XXMMQS-MACE (PTY) LTD - Claim for work doneXOTIS (PTY) LTD Variation on contract.XVISION AFRICA as part of MMQS-MACE (PTY) LTD - Alleged work done.XXPro-Serve Consulting - Alleged work done.XXKamo Architects - Alleged services renderedXKamo Construction - Alleged services renderedXSiyangena interest.XXLebepe Quantity Surveyors - Alleged services renderedXXBrouwers Property Development cc – PenaltiesXDavid Underwood/Sharpline Graphics - Claim for breach of contractXMtiya Dynamics - Alleged services renderedXTshepo Nkwana - Unlawful deduction from pension fund payoutXDC Worst Composite (PTY) LTD vs Tecuvert & PRASA - Alleged services renderedXDC Worst Composite (PTY) LTD vs Baraka Eng & PRASA - Alleged services renderedXDC Worst Composite (PTY)LTD vs Ecoan Eng & PRASA - Alleged services rendered-XSebenza Shipping and Forwarding - Alleged services renderedXFabor Engineering Products (PTY) LTD - Alleged services renderedXNkambule and Associates - Alleged services renderedXSuperway Constructions vs PRASA - Alleged services renderedXTheeunissen J? vs PRASA & others Claim for injuries/unlawful arrestXPhaahlana Mahlako Investments - Alleged services renderedXBoyisa Trading Enterprise - Alleged services renderedXMatters initiated by PRASAMatterDate launchedStatusSwifambo Rail LeasingJune 2016In progressSwifambo Rail Leasing – Appeal by SwifamboJune 2017In progressSiyangena Technologies December 2015In progressSiyangena TechnologiesMarch 2018In progressCompass Insurance July 2015In progressEastern Cape?: Department of HealthJanuary 2011In progressNational Department of Public WorksApril 2011In progressArbour TownFebruary 2011In progressF GastinSeptember 2016In progressJ PhungulaDecember 2015In progressD MthimkhuluNovember 2015In progressM MngomezuluDecember 2016In progressMazwe Financial ServicesApril 2016In progressIndependent Development Corporation (IDC)November 2016In progress(a)There are twelve (12) matters outstanding where PRASA have initiated legal action:Matter(b) Detail(c) StatusSwifambo Rail Leasing In July 2017, the Local Division of the Gauteng High court ruled in favour of PRASA to set aside an agreement in the amount of R3.5 billion with Swifambo Rail Leasing for the sale and purchase locomotives dated 25 March 2013. PRASA had paid Swifambo an amount of R2.6 billion. The matter has been taken on appeal. Awaiting date from Supreme Court of AppealSiyangena TechnologiesReview of award of the tender and/or contract to supply and install ISAMS .In progressCompass Insurance Claims against an insurer of a contractor in respect of the non-performance of contractor that has since been liquidated.In progressEastern Cape?: Department of HealthClaim for alleged failure to pay for Professional ServicesIn progressNational Department of Public WorksClaim for alleged failure to pay for Professional ServicesIn progressArbour TownClaim for alleged failure to pay for Professional ServicesIn progressF GastinClaim for monies paid where no services were rendered and the contract was irregularAwaiting hearing dateJ PhungulaClaim for payments made to an employee who was employed on the basis of misrepresentationAwaiting trial dateD MthimkhuluClaim for payments made to an employee who was employed on the basis of misrepresentationAwaiting trial dateM MngomezuluClaim for salaries paid when employee was absent without leave of absence.. Awaiting trial dateMazwe Financial ServicesClaim of monies erroneously paid in respect of unpaid loans advanced to employeesAssessing detail of quantum of claimIndependent Development Corporation (IDC)Refusal to pay gurantee to PRASA on a contractor that failed to remedy breach of provisions. Process to complete legal matters take timeThe matters in legal do not have an allocated budget per individual case. Spending on each case also requires detailed analysis as legal representatives deal with more than one matter. PRASA also has a number of law firms that represent the entitiy.Legal Fees PRASA2015/162016/172017/18BudgetR36,099 millionR35 millionR36 millionSpendR69,643 millionR49,424 millionR60,874 millionPorts Regulator of South Africa (PRSA)(b) The Ports Regulator did not have any legal matters that were dealt with except for those under the Tribunal function which is one of its programmes.N/AN/AN/ASouth African Maritime Safety Authority (SAMSA)In 2016/2017 SAMSA had a litigious matter -Patrick Eric Deale t/a Deale Attorneys v SAMSA Case No. 4290/2017- the claim was in respect unpaid legal fees. The matter was settled in the amount R35?677.44. SAMSA currently has one pending litigious matter. S Gool v SAMSA sued out the Regional Court for Regional Division of Western Cape Case No.616/2018. The claim is for amounts allegedly owed to Mr Gool for work he did in respect of feasibility study. The amount being claimed R 280?000.00. The matter is outstanding.(b) The Cross-Border Road Transport Agency (C-BRTA) 2015/16 - 7 Matters (i) 2016/17 - 7 matters (i) 2017/18 - 10 matters (ii) details of the specified matters in each caseFinancial Year 2015/16Commencement dateTitle of the MatterFact of the Matter14 September 2014(carried over from previous financial year)Road Freight Association //Minister of Transport and C-BRTAreview application to review the legislative process followed with regard to promulgation of the 2014 Permit Tariffs16 April 2014(carried over from previous financial year)Dermit O Brein // C-BRTACourt Applicant claim for unlawful arrest.10 September 2016C-BRTA // Shavana Ni Vukosi Trading and Projects (PTY) LTDRecovery of monies from a service provider that failed to deliver all the stationary that was ordered by the Agency.10 June 2015Florence Lebyane// C-BRTAClaim for defamation of character, the applicant claims she was wrongfully accused, for stealing the amount of R1000-00.25 June 2015Manyatseng, Ficksburg, Borolelo-Trans Free State // C-BRTAReview and setting aside of Regulatory Committee decision to issue cross-border permits to operate from South Africa to the Kingdom of Lesotho be reviewed and set aside.16 January 2014(carried over from previous financial year)Muranga and Others// C-BRTAClaim for breach of employment contract.06 July 2015RSA-Lesotho Cross–Border Route Corridor Committee//Minister of Transport and otherDeclaring a directive invalid and setting it aside.(ii) details of the specified matters in each caseFinancial Year 2016/17Commencement DateTitle of the MatterFact of the Matter1 September 2014(carried over from previous financial year)Central African Road Services //Minister of Transport, C-BRTAReview application to review the legislative process followed with regard to promulgation of the 2014 Permit Tariffs.14 September 2014(carried over from previous financial year)Road Freight Association //Minister of Transport and C-BRTAReview application to review the legislative process followed with regard to promulgation of the 2014 Permit Tariffs.16 April 2014(carried over from previous financial year)Dermit O Brein // C-BRTACourt Applicant claim for unlawful arrest.10 September 2016C-BRTA // Shavana Ni Vukosi Trading and Projects (PTY) LTDRecovery of monies from a service provider that failed to deliver all the stationary that was ordered by the Agency.10 June 2015(carried over from previous financial year)Florence Lebyane// C-BRTAClaim for defamation of character, the applicant claims she was wrongfully accused, for stealing the amount of R1000-00.25 June 2015(carried over from previous financial year)Manyatseng, Ficksburg, Borolelo-Trans Free State // C-BRTAReview and setting aside of Regulatory Committee decision to issue cross-border permits to operate from South Africa to the Kingdom of Lesotho be reviewed and set aside.16 January 2014(carried over from previous financial year)Muranga and Others// C-BRTAClaim for breach of employment contract.(ii) details of the specified matters in each caseFinancial Year 2017/18Commencement dateTitle of the MatterFact of the Matter8 April 2017Jj Trauernicht // Cross Border Road Transport Agency-BRTA, Amos LelopeThe applicant in this matter was involved in an accident with an RTI officer. The applicant drove into the RTI office as he crossed the road.14 September 2014(carried over from previous financial year)Central African Road Services //Minister of Transport, C-BRTAReview application to review the legislative process followed with regard to promulgation of the 2014 Permit Tariffs.16 April 2014(carried over from previous financial year)Road Freight Association //Minister of Transport and C-BRTAReview application to review the legislative process followed with regard to promulgation of the 2014 Permit Tariffs.16 April 2014(carried over from previous financial year)Dermit O Brein // C-BRTACourt Applicant claim for unlawful arrest.10 September 2016(carried over from previous financial year)C-BRTA // Shavana Ni Vukosi Trading and Projects (PTY) LTDRecovery of monies from a service provider that failed to deliver all the stationary that was ordered by the Agency.10 June 2015(carried over from previous financial year)Florence Lebyane// C-BRTAClaim for defamation of character, the applicant claims she was wrongfully accused, for stealing the amount of R1000-00.25 June 2015(carried over from previous financial year)Manyatseng, Ficksburg, Borolelo-Trans Free State // C-BRTAReview and setting aside of Regulatory Committee decision to issue cross-border permits to operate from South Africa to the Kingdom of Lesotho be reviewed and set aside.16 January 2014(carried over from previous financial year)Muranga and Others// C-BRTAClaim for breach of employment contract. 5 April 2017 Reggie Williams and Other// C-BRTAIllegality regarding the migration of the road transport inspectorate to RTMC.6 November 2017C-BRTA// National Cross Border Taxi Association and othersUrgent interdict to remove the protesting taxi association from at the Agencies premises and to prevent them from continuing or returning at a later date.The details of the matters initiated by the C-BRTA are in the table below?:Title of MatterLaunch DateDate ConcludedC-BRTA//Shavana Ni Vukosi10 September 2015PendingC-BRTA// National Cross Border Taxi Association and others6 November 20176 November 2017(a) Seven (7) matters are outstanding.(b) Title of the Matter Fact of the Matter(c) Reason outstandingJj Trauernicht // Cross Border Road Transport Agency-BRTA, Amos LelopeThe applicant in this matter was involved in an accident with an RTI officer. The applicant drove into the RTI office as he crossed the road.Pending, dependent on court processesCentral African Road Services //Minister of Transport, C-BRTAReview application to review the legislative process followed with regard to promulgation of the 2014 Permit Tariffs.Road Freight Association //Minister of Transport and C-BRTAReview application to review the legislative process followed with regard to promulgation of the 2014 Permit Tariffs.Dermit O Brein // C-BRTACourt Applicant claim for unlawful arrest.C-BRTA // Shavana Ni Vukosi Trading And Projects(PTY) LTDRecovery of monies from a service provider that failed to deliver all the stationary that was ordered by the Agency.Florence Lebyane// C-BRTAClaim for defamation of character, the applicant claims she was wrongfully accused, for stealing the amount of R1000-00.Manyatseng, Ficksburg, Borolelo-Trans Free State // C-BRTAReview and setting aside of Regulatory Committee decision to issue cross-border permits to operate from South Africa to the Kingdom of Lesotho be reviewed and set aside.(a) The following amounts were budgeted for in each of the financial years:2015/16 – R3,588,6972016/17 – R4,019,3412017/18 – R4,750,000Total spent on each matter is as per the table below:NoTitle of the Matter2015/2016(R)2016/2017(R)2017/2018(R)1Central African Road Services //Minister of Transport, C-BRTA736,930162,415-2Road Freight Association //Minister of Transport and C-BRTA623,55442,806315,3853Dermit O Brein // C-BRTA---4C-BRTA // Shavana Ni Vukosi Trading And Projects (PTY) LTD---5Florence Lebyane// C-BRTA21,91334,75464,8456Manyatseng, Ficksburg, Borolelo-Trans Free State // C-BRTA57,523--7Jj Trauernicht // C-BRTA, Amos Lelope--167,9228RSA- Lesotho Cross –Border Route Corridor Committee//Minister of Transport and other543,386--9Muranga and Others// Cross Border Road Transport Agency30,4851,63590,84410Reggie Williams and Other// Cross Border Road Transport Agency---11C-BRTA// National Cross Border Taxi Association and others--36,385(b) The Road Traffic Infringement Agency (RTIA) (i) 5 Legal matters (ii) Details of the specified matterName of LitigationNature of LitigationFines for U & AnotherLitigant seeking to review decisions taken by representation officers in terms of section 18 of the AARTO Act.Edwards MatterThe Applicant in this matter requests the court to order the Agency and Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality (joined as the second respondent in the matter) to issue him with his driving licence and licence disk in respect of various vehicles under the circumstances where the Applicant has been served with an enforcement order.Howard Dambovsky v Department of Transport and othersMr Dembovsky has lodged this application to, amongst others; contest the constitutionality of some of the provisions in the AARTO Act as well as its Regulations. He alleges that those identified provisions of the Act contravene in the main, the right to a fair trial as enshrined in the Constitution. This application also seeks to request cancellation of all infringement notices in an instance where infringers have elected to be tried in court but have still not been served with summonses for a period over 18 months, as prescribed by the Director of Public Prosecutions.Mpanza MatterReview application of the AARTO divisions.CANCOMReview application of the AARTO divisions.(2) Matter launched Name of LitigationLaunched Concluded Fines for U & Another2013 2017Edwards Matter20172017Howard Dambovsky v Department of Transport and others2016Abandoned CANCOM20142016(3)(a) 1(b) Constitutionality of AARTO(c) Matter Is still at the pleading stage. (4)Budgeted Spent2015/16R 5 milR 800k2016/17R 5 milR 3.5 mil2017/18R 5 milR 3 mil(b) The Road Traffic Management Corporation (i)2015/16 – 6 Matters (i) 2016/17 - 3 matters (i) 2017/18 - 4 mattersFINANCIAL YEARSMATTERS/ DETAIL(2) MATTERS INITIATED2015/20162016/20172017/2018WAYMARK INFOTECH (PTY) LTD vs RTMCWaymark appointed to develop and install an Enterprise Recourse Planning System (ERP). Waymark instituted legal action against the RTMC in 2010 for the outstanding Contract price,The RTMC successfully defended the matter as the Court ordered absolution of the instance because Waymark failed to proof their case. 23 May 2014 Waymark again instituted legal action against the RTMC. TIJGER VALLEI (PTY) LTD & OTHERS vs RTMCTijger Vallei 1 (Pty) Ltd, Carslwald Gardens (Pty) Ltd, Jamwa Beleggings (Pty) Ltd, Awaiz @ 5th Avenue Investments CC and Clifton Dunes Investments 166 (Pty) Ltd, issued summons to recover purported outstanding lease amounts.RTMC defended the matterThe complainants abandoned claimMatter ClosedCIVAIR vs RTMCCIVAIR issued summon against the RTMC for payment of helicopter services rendered during April 2013. The RTMC defended the matter Parties Settled the matter out of courtMatter ClosedINTERCAPE FERREIRA INTERLINER vs RTMCIntercape Ferreira Interliner issued summons against the RTMC, claiming that it suffered damages as a result of the operations of the NTPU and statement made by the erstwhile Acting CEORTMC defended that matter and file its pleaComplainant abandoned matterMatter ClosedTASIMA (PTY) LYD VS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT AND THE RTMCTasima brought an urgent application to uphold and enforce, the terms of various extant court orders on the basis of contempt. RTMC and the Department opposed the application and brought counter application to contest the unlawful extension of the agreement in 2010 PJ BADENHORST VS RTMCThe complainant issued summons against the RTMC for purported unlawful arrest. RTMC opposed the action and filed its plainant abandoned matterMatter ClosedBLOEMFONTEIN SHOW VS RTMC BloemfonteinShow organisers issued summons against the RTMC Parties settled matterMatter ClosedMAVUNGA vs RTMC? The complainant issued summons against the RTMC for purported unlawful arrest.?RTMC opposed the action and filed its plea.?Litigation OngoingJPSA vs DEPARTMENT AND OTHERSJPSA bring application to contest AARTO ProcedureRTMC Opposed the applicationPlaintiff Abandoned ApplicationMatter ClosedAll 2016/2017 matters excluding matters marked ‘Closed’REKWELE CHAUFEUR DRIVE (PTY(LTD) vs RTMCRekwele issued summons to claim purported outstanding costs for rental of vehicles by the RTMC.RTMC defended the matter and filed a special plea.Litigation OngoingNKWATSI and 5 Others vs RTMCThe complainants issued summons against the RTMC for purported unlawful arrest.RTMC opposed the action Litigation OngoingPUTCOMAFANI VS RTMCService provider issued summons against the RTMC for breach of contract – Repudiation.The RTMC defended the matterLitigation OngoingTASIMA (PTY) LYD VS RTMCApplication to enforce Section 197 of Labour Relations ActRTMC opposed applicationLitigation Ongoing4162425571400Pre- 2015/2016MOHLALENG INVESTMENT HOLDINGS PTY (LTD)RTMC instituted legal action against Mohlaleng for the outstanding deposit as well as for all expenses the RTMC incurred as a result of the RTMC relocating offices from Silver LakesMohlaleng defended matterLitigation Ongoing2015 / 2016DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT AND THE RTMC vs TASIMADepartment and RTMC bring counter application to the declare 2010 extention of Tasima Agreement Unlawfull30 April 2015RTMC vs TASIMARTMC bring urgent application agianst Tasima to enforce Constitutional Court order of 9 November 2016March 2017Litigation Ongoing2017/2018RTMC vs TELKOMRTMC bring Urgent Application to order Telkom to seize service suspension18 October 2017RTMC vs TELKOMRTMC bring Urgent Application to order Telkom to seize service suspension25 October 2017(3) MATTERS OUTSTANDINGDETAILSREASON / STATUSWAYMARK INFOTECH (PTY) LTD vs RTMC?Waymark appointed to develop and install an Enterprise Recourse Planning System (ERP). ? Waymark instituted legal action against the RTMC in 2010 for the outstanding Contract price,?The RTMC successfully defended the matter as the Court ordered absolution of the instance because Waymark failed to proof their case. ?23 May 2014 Waymark again instituted legal action against the RTMC.RTMC appeal to CC (Counter Claim)Awaiting directions from CCLitigation on-goingMOHLALENG INVESTMENT HOLDINGS PTY (LTD)?RTMC instituted legal action against Mohlaleng for the outstanding deposit as well as for all expenses the RTMC incurred as a result of the RTMC relocating offices from Silver Lakes? Mohlaleng defended matterSet down for Trail - 19 February 2019Litigation on-goingMAVUNGA vs RTMCThe complainant issued summons against the RTMC for purported unlawful arrest.RTMC opposed the action and filed its plea.?Litigation on-goingREKWELE CHAUFEUR DRIVE (PTY(LTD) vs RTMC?Rekwele issued summons to claim purported outstanding costs for rental of vehicles by the RTMC.?RTMC defended the matter and filed a special plea.?Litigation on-goingNKWATSI and 5 Others vs RTMC?The complainant issued summons against the RTMC for purported unlawful arrest.?RTMC opposed the action and filed its exception and plea.?Litigation on-goingPUTCOMAFANI VS RTMC?Service provider issued summons against the RTMC for breach of contract – Repudiation.?The RTMC defended the matter?Litigation on-goingRTMC vs TELKOM?RTMC bring Urgent Application to order Telkom to seize service suspension? Telkom appealed final order?Litigation on-goingRTMC vs TASIMARTMC bring urgent application agianst Tasima to enforce Constitutional Court order of 9 November 2016Tasima Appealed to SCA and CCMatter in CC 8 March 2018?Awaiting CC judgementTASIMA vs RTMC?Application to enforce Section 197 of Labour Relations Act?RTMC opposed application?RTMC appealed to Labour Appeals Court (LAC)?Awaiting LAC date?Litigation on-going(4) FINANCIAL YEARBUDGET MATTEREXPENDITURE2015/2016R5 000 000 adjusted to R14 200 000Waymark Infotech (PTY) LTD vs RTMCTASIMA (PTY) LTD VS Department Of Transport and RTMCR 90,820.62R13 988,280.402016/2017R5 500 000Waymark Infotech (Pty) Ltd Vs RTMCMohlaleng Investment Holdings Pty LTDTasima (Pty) Lyd Vs Department Of Transport And The RtmcRTMC VS TELKOMJPSA vs DEPARTMENTPJ Badenhorst VS RTMCMavunga vs RTMCR1 918 052.28R70 090.80R8 203 642.56R166 405.20R18973.392017/2018R 5 700 000Waymark Infotech (PTY) LTD vs RTMCMohlaleng Investment Holdings Pty (LTD)TASIMA (PTY) LYD VS Department Of Transport and RTMCRTMC vs TASIMATASIMA (PTY) LYD VS RTMC RTMC vs TELKOM x2NKWATSI and 5 Others vs RTMCRekwele Chaufeur Drive (PTY(LTD) vs RTMCPUTCOMAFANI VS RTMCR230 566.34R5908.62R7 508 686.91R74530.49 R37128 (1) (b) The Road Accident Fund (RAF) dealt with 233 Legal matters in past 3 Financial Years excluding litigation matters under the RAF Act, No. 56 of 1996)(i)2015/16 - 80 Matters (53 Legal Unit and 27 Employee Relations Unit)(i) 2016/17 - 67 matters (48 Legal Unit and 19 Employee Relations Unit)(i) 2017/18 - 86 matters (54 Legal Unit; 29 Employee Relations Unit and 3 Corporate Secretariat)No.(ii) details of the specified matters in each caseLegal Unit2015-161L Dreyer brought a legislative challenge in respect of regulation 3 to the Act.2C Mounton brought a legislative challenge in respect of regulation 3 to the Act.3M Mahlatsi brought a legislative challenge in respect of regulation 3 to the Act.4Mithethe Trading Enterprise instituted an action in respect of alleged breach of contract.5Empower Financial Services (Pty) Ltd instituted an action in respect of alleged breach of contract.6M Kubjana & Others brought a legislative challenge in respect of Regulation 3 to the Act.7Consolidated matters: M Lingenfenlder, S du Toit, S Renken, E Taljaard, P Uys, J Du Preez, L Fulscher, J Renken, M Van Der Merwe, E Retief, W Du Preez, S Gresch brought a legislative challenge in respect of sections 18(1)(a)(i), 18(1)(b) and 18(2) of the Act.8M Kubjana & Others brought a legislative challenge in respect of regulation 3 to the Act.9Consolidated matters: M Lingenfenlder, S du Toit, S Renken, E Taljaard, P Uys, J Du Preez, L Fulscher, J Renken, M Van Der Merwe, E Retief, W Du Preez, S Gresch brought a legislative challenge in respect of sections18(1)(a)(i), 18(1)(b) and 18(2) of the Act.10H Matidza instituted action claiming damages as per the judgement in his favour. The RAF appealed the judgement awarding punitive cost against the claims handler.11RAF instituted action to recover debt from MSMM Attorneys.12RAF instituted action to recover debt from TC Beea.13RAF instituted action to recover debt from Ke Yona Business Information Management Solutions.14C F Jeftha brought a legislative challenge in respect of sections 19(g) and s 21 of the Act.15R & M Combrink brought a legislative challenge in respect of regulation 2(3) to the Act.16L Mlenga logded a dispute in terms of the Promotion of Access to Information Act, 2000 in respect of access to file copies.17Towell & Groenewaldt Attorneys instituted action in relation to the RAF Supply Chain Management process.18C Degneer brought a legislative challenge in respect of section 50(1) of the Magistrates’ Court Act.19C Kgoale brought a legislative challenge in respect of section 50(1) of the Magistrates’ Court Act.20Mac Ndhlovu Attorneys instituted action in relation to the RAF supply chain management process21T & N Assessors instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.22RAF instituted action against A Ramavhunga to recover debt.23RAF instituted action against Mashishi Attorneys to recover debt.24RAF instituted action against Meintjes Petzer Attorneys to recover debt.25L J Moeketsi brought a legislative challenge in respect of regulation 2(3) to the Act.26D De Jager, brought a legislative challenge in respect of regulation 2(3) to the Act.27J T Tshoba brought a legislative challenge in respect of regulation 2(3) to the Act.28Consolidated matters: MP Mangena,P T Motsena,A A Mbonana,H M Mahlangu,N J Mazibuko,J M Mashibini,F A Khuzwayo, M L Letsoalo, P M De Esclana, N Momberg, N Archary, G J Bothma, N Momberg (Snr), CJ Knight, M J Motloung, S Ngunyula, T J Masuku, R D Molefe, R Werner, A Swanepoel, E Fourie, M M Masenya, PN Majela, MM Madonsela, RE Fereira brought a legislative challenge in respect of regulation 3 & 5 to the Act.29N P Fakude and forty-six others brought a legislative challenge in respect of sections 17(1), 17(1A), 19(a), and 21 of the Act.30Y Chotia brought a legislative challenge in respect of regulation 3 to the Act.31Z G Magayiana brought a legislative challenge in respect of regulation 3 to the Act.32J N Khoza obo A Chabangu brought a legislative challenge in respect of sections 17(1), 17(1A), 19(a) and 21 of the Act.33M Katse brought a legislative challenge in respect of sections 17(1) and 17(4) (a)(c), and the regulations.34Zahwa Entertainment instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.Legal Unit2015-1636A R Fogwill instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.37King & Queen Tour instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.38Mashishi & Meyers Assessor instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.39Booyens Du Preez & Boshoff Inc instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.40Caveonet Investments (Pty) Ltd t/a Becker & Mzimela Investigations instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.41M T F Consultants (Pty) Ltd instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.42B Mbalu brought a labour dispute in respect of unfair dismissal.43N Oliphant lodged a dispute in terms of the Promotion of Access to Information Act, 2000 in respect of access to records.44R Devchander obo V instituted an action claiming damages in relation to an alleged wrongful arrest.45G O Simelane instituted an action claiming damages in relation to an alleged wrongful arrest.46J M Moyo instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.47M Gwebityala instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.48M L Malebo v Searle Attorneys instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.49V Khumalo instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.50M D Faes instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.51M V Netshipale instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.52HB Molefe Attorneys instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.53Brian Hitchings, NO obo S R Mlangeni instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.2016/17 Financial Year1RAF instituted action to recover debt from MSMM Attorneys.2RAF instituted action to recover debt from TC Beea.3RAF instituted action to recover debt from Ke Yona Business Information Management Solutions.4C F Jeftha brought a legislative challenge in respect of sections 19(g) and 21 of the Act.5L Mlenga logded a dispute in terms of the Promotion of Access to Information Act, 2000 in respect of access to file copies.6Towell & Groenewaldt Attorneys instituted action in relation to the RAF Supply Chain Management process.7C Degneer brought a legislative challenge in respect of section 50(1) of the Magistrates’ Court Act.8C Kgoale brought a legislative challenge in respect of section 50(1) of the Magistrates’ Court Act.9J S Thokoane & twenty others instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.10T & N Assessors instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.11RAF instituted action against A Ramavhunga to recover debt.12RAF instituted action against Mashishi Attorneys to recover debt.13RAF instituted action against Mabunda Attorneys to recover debt.14RAF instituted action against Meintjes Petzer Attorneys to recover debt.15L J Moeketsi brought a legislative challenge in respect of regulation 2(3) to the Act.16D De Jager, brought a legislative challenge in respect of regulation 2(3) to the Act.17J T Tshoba brought a legislative challenge in respect of regulation 2(3) to the Act.18Consolidated matters: MP Mangena,P T Motsena,A A Mbonana,H M Mahlangu,N J Mazibuko,J M Mashibini,F A Khuzwayo, M L Letsoalo, P M De Esclana, N Momberg, N Archary, G J Bothma, N Momberg (Snr), C J Knight, M J Motloung, S Ngunyula, T J Masuku, R D Molefe, R Werner, A Swanepoel, E Fourie, M M Masenya, PN Majela, MM Madonsela, RE Fereira brought a legislative challenge in respect of regulation 3 & 5 to the Act19N P Fakude and forty-six others and Thokoane & twenty others brought a legislative challenge in respect of sections 17(1), 17(1A), 19(a) and 21 of the Act.20Y Chotia brought a legislative challenge in respect of regulation 3 to the Act.21Z G Magayiana brought a legislative challenge in respect of regulation 3 to the Act.22G W De Waal brought a legislative challenge in respect of regulation 3 to the Act.23J N Khoza obo A Chabangu brought a legislative challenge in respect of sections 17(1), 17(1A), 19(a) and 21 of the Act24M Katse brought a legislative challenge in respect of sections 17(1) and 17(4) (a)(c), and the regulations.28Zahwa Entertainment instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.26W J Mkhonza & Associates instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.27A R Fogwill instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.28King & Queen Tour instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.29Mashishi & Meyers Assessor instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.30Booyens Du Preez & Boshoff Inc instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.31Caveonet Investments (Pty) Ltd t/a Becker & Mzimela Investigations instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.32M T F Consultants (Pty) Ltd instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.33B Mbalu brought a labour dispute in respect of unfair dismissal.34N Oliphant lodged a dispute in terms of the Promotion of Access to Information Act, 2000 in respect of access to records35R Devchander obo V instituted an action claiming damages in relation to an alleged wrongful arrest.36G O Simelane instituted an action claiming damages in relation to an alleged wrongful arrest.37J M Moyo instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.38M Gwebityala instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.39M L Malebo v Searle Attorneys instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.40V Khumalo instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.41M D Faes instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.42M V Netshipale instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.43HB Molefe Attorneys instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.44Brian Hitchings, NO obo S R Mlangeni instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.2017/18 Financial Year1Bokwa Attorneys instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.2Mohlala Attorneys instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.3F Schutte Attorneys instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.4L E Lopedi Ford brought a legislative challenge in respect of sections 17, 17(A) and 26 of the Act.5F Galant brought a legislative challenge in respect of sections 17, 17(A) and 26 of the Act.6M Venter brought a legislative challenge in respect of sections 17(1), 17(4)(a), (c), (A) and (B) of the Act.7Salani Marketing & Projects instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.8Adv. N Krige instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.9AN Jamotte instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.10Askew Grindlay Attorneys instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.11L Grundling instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.12TR &S Pillay instituted an action claiming damages in relation to an alleged wrongful arrest.13K Malao Attorneys instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.14TB Nsibande instituted an action claiming damages in relation to an alleged wrongful arrest.15Van Zyl Le Roux Inc & Grimbeek Van Rooyen Inc instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.16N N Ndamse instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.17Synko Projects (Pty) Ltd instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.18JN Chiliza instituted action challenging the principle of litis contestatio.19Mac Ndhlovu Attorneys instituted a further action in relation to the RAF supply chain management process.20J S Thokoane & twenty others instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.21T & N Assessors instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.22RAF instituted action against A Ramavhunga to recover debt.23RAF V Mashishi Attorneys recovery of debt.24RAF instituted action against Mabunda Attorneys to recover debt.25L J Moeketsi brought a legislative challenge in respect of regulation 2(3) to the Act.26D De Jager, brought a legislative challenge in respect of regulation 2(3) to the Act.27J T Tshoba brought a legislative challenge in respect of regulation 2(3) to the Act.Consolidated matters: M L Letsoalo, N Momberg, T J Masuku, M M Masenya brought a legislative challenge in respect of regulation 3 & 5 to the Act28N P Fakude and forty-six others and Thokoane & twenty others brought a legislative challenge in respect of sections 17(1), 17(1A), 19(a) and 21 of the Act.29Y Chotia brought a legislative challenge in respect of regulation 3 to the Act.30Z G Magayiana brought a legislative challenge in respect of regulation 3 to the Act.31G W De Waal brought a legislative challenge in respect of regulation 3 to the Act.32J N Khoza obo A Chabangu brought a legislative challenge in respect of sections 17(1), 17(1A), 19(a) and 21 of the Act.33M Katse brought a legislative challenge in respect of sections 17(1) and 17(4) (a)(c), and the regulations.34Zahwa Entertainment instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.35W J Mkhonza & Associates instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.36A R Fogwill instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.37King & Queen Tour instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.38Mashishi & Meyers Assessor instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.39Booyens Du Preez & Boshoff Inc instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.40Caveonet Investments (Pty) Ltd t/a Becker & Mzimela Investigations instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.41M T F Consultants (Pty) Ltd instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.42B Mbalu brought a labour dispute in respect of unfair dismissal.43N Oliphant lodged a dispute in terms of the Promotion of Access to Information Act, 2000 in respect of access to records44R Devchander obo V instituted an action claiming damages in relation to an alleged wrongful arrest.45G O Simelane instituted an action claiming damages in relation to an alleged wrongful arrest.46J M Moyo instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.47M Gwebityala instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.48M L Malebo v Searle Attorneys instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.49V Khumalo instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.50M D Faes instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.51M V Netshipale instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.52HB Molefe Attorneys instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.53Brian Hitchings, NO obo S R Mlangeni instituted action claiming damages in relation to a contractual dispute.Corporate Secretariat2017/18 Financial Year 1Dr. T Kommal initiated a governance dispute in respect of governance.2Dr. T Kommal initiated a governance dispute in respect of governance.3Dr. T Kommal initiated a governance dispute in respect of governance.Employee Relation Unit2015/16 Financial Year1C. Maswanganye instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of demotion.2Z. Nduneni instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of constructive dismissal.3L. Mashilo instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of benefits.4SATAWU on behalf of Mahlotja and three others instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of promotion5SATAWU on behalf of five others instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of benefits.6SATAWU obo Noxolo Ntongolo instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of unfair dismissal.7R. Johnson instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of promotion.8D. Chelopo instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of unfair dismissal.9D. Golele instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of unfair dismissal.10M. Moseneke instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of unfair dismissal.11SATAWU obo of S. Munsammy instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of promotion.12L. Pillay instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of promotion.13P. Motswiri instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of suspension.14D. Lekganyane instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of unfair dismissal.15T. Mafanya instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of unfair dismissal.16L. Myataza instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of unfair dismissal.17P. Kgosiyadira instituted an unfair labour practise dispute in respect of benefits.18B. Mbalu instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of misconduct and incompatibility.19G Mahlangu instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of unfair dismissal.20K. Maitisa instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of dismissal on misconduct and dishonesty.21W. Mokubyane instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of Task Grading.22D. Mokolobateinstituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of review of CCMA award.23P. Mathebula & B. Mankwaneinstituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of review of CCMA award.24Moseneke and other instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of review of CCMA award on condonation.252016/17 Financial Year1P Hlungwani instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of demotion.2D Maluleke instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of demotion.3SATAWU obo Ngwenyama and four others instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of benefits.4SATAWU obo Sabasa, Johanna and eight others instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of benefits.5M. Jozana instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of equal pay for equal work of value.6T Mazibuko instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of constructive dismissal.7A. Lenders instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of constructive dismissal8M Sibanyoni instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of unfair dismissal.9R Mapumulo instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of unfair dismissal.10SATAWU obo Mfanafuthi Dlamini instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of unfair dismissal.11D. Creighton instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of unfair dismissal.12T Magoro instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of unfair dismissal.13T Magoro instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of unfair dismissal.14S Gona instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of promotion.15SATAWU on behalf of Mahlomotja and three others instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of promotion.16Xolisa Mgqamqo instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of unfair dismissal.17P. Ramdial instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of disciplinary action short of dismissal.18SATAWU obo L. Matodzi instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of constructive dismissal.19L. Peter instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of unfair dismissal.20G. Qobeka instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of unfair dismissal.21L. Peter instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of unfair dismissal.2017/18 Financial Year 1A Mhlauli instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of unfair dismissal.2SATAWU obo members instituted an unfair labour practice in respect of disciplinary action short of dismissal.3NUMSA obo members instituted a dispute in relation to a collective agreement.4NUMSA obo members instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of benefits.5J. Matimela instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of constructive dismissal.6N. Ntambi instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of unfair dismissal.7L. Gxanashe instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of unfair dismissal.8M. Mphupu instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of unfair dismissal.9L. Moima instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of unfair dismissal.10Z. Dangwana instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of unfair dismissal.11A. Motsamai instituted an unfair labour practice in respect of disciplinary action demotion.12M. Seku instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of benefits.13B. Mkhwanazi instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of promotion.14SATAWU obo Sebenzile Mlaza instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of promotion.15R. Mokgoko instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of benefits.16P Ngwasheng instituted an unfair labour practice in respect of disciplinary action.17NUMSA instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of dispute of mutual interest.18M. Mushi instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of deduction.19Kalaivani Pillay instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of dispute of mutual interest.20SATAWU obo Farisan Nzumbululo instituted anunfair labour practise in respect of disciplinary action.21SATAWU obo G Songezo instituted an unfair labour practise dispute in respect of unfair dismissal.22SATAWU obo Nonjongo instituted an arbitration unfair dismissal.23NUMSA obo Gcanabanainstituted an unfair labour practise dispute in respect of unfair dismissal.24L Majela brought instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of disciplinary action.25M Mabelebele instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of promotion.L Pretorius instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of disciplinary action.2627L Boihang instituted anunfair labour practise dispute in respect of unfair dismissal.28Z Abrahams instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of promotion.29SATAWU obo Rathipa and nine others instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of disciplinary action.30L. Matodzi instituted an unfair labour practice dispute in respect of unfair dismissal.SANRALQuestions 1-3Please refer to Annexure A attached to this letter. All matters which are highlighted in grey in the annexure, relates to both the High (referred to as Pilot 2 matters) and Magistrate (referred to as Pilot 1 matters) Court actions which Sanral has instituted for e-toll debt.Question 4Financial YearsActual BudgetActual Spent2015/2016R 5?135?400.00R 27?584?699.532016/2017R 25?362?588.00R 22?729 860.242017/2018R 23?743?988.00R 26?430 688.81 ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download