AUTHOR PROJECT PEER EDITING CHECKLIST
|AUTHOR PROJECT PEER EDITING CHECKLIST |
|11 CP English |
|Mrs. Hogentogler |
| |
|Author Name:________________________________ Peer Editor Name:________________________________ |
|MLA Format |Yes |No |Comments |
| | | | |
|Proper MLA heading, correct pagination (header), and title | | | |
|12-point Times New Roman font | | | |
|Double spaced; 1” margins | | | |
|Introduction | | | |
| | | | |
|A relevant and interesting AGD (Attention-getting Device) is present. | | | |
|Effective transitions explain the AGD and connect it to a specific thesis. | | | |
|A three (3)-prong thesis is used to introduce the topic and to preview the order of at least | | | |
|three (3) clearly defined main points. | | | |
|Body | | | |
| | | | |
|Well-written topic sentences are used to introduce each new paragraph and relate it to the | | | |
|thesis. | | | |
|The body follows an organized pattern as previewed in the thesis. | | | |
|Each paragraph contains only one main idea (maintains focus). | | | |
|Main ideas are explained in connection to the thesis using evidence. | | | |
|Thoughts and ideas display organization and fluidity | | | |
|At least three (3) direct quotes are used correctly and are properly anchored (Main point + | | | |
|supporting quote + internal citation). | | | |
|Paraphrased information is properly credited. | | | |
|Internal citations are used correctly. | | | |
|Mechanics | | | |
| | | | |
|No run-on sentences or fragments | | | |
|No grammatical errors (verb tense consistent, subject/verb agreement, pronoun/antecedent | | | |
|agreement, maintains formal objective voice) | | | |
|No grammatical homonyms (Ex: there, their, they’re) | | | |
|No spelling, capitalization errors, or punctuation errors | | | |
|Effective and varied vocabulary is used (No forbidden words!) | | | |
|No 1st or 2nd person pronouns (Ex: I, me, my, mine, you, your, we, us) | | | |
|No contractions or abbreviations | | | |
|All numbers less than 100 are written out | | | |
|Conclusion | | | |
| | | | |
|Rephrases thesis statement | | | |
|Adequately summarizes paper’s argument and comes to a conclusion | | | |
|Has clincher | | | |
|Works Cited Page | | | |
| | | | |
|At least four sources are used (at least 3 print; no more than 1 internet). | | | |
|All sources are reputable (vetted). | | | |
|All sources listed are cited within the paper. | | | |
|All sources are accurately cited according to MLA format. | | | |
Additional:
Paper is fewer than four (4) pages in length
Overall Comments:
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
- expository essay peer editing sheet
- author project peer editing checklist
- research paper peer editing checklist
- short story peer editing raleigh charter high school
- high point c unit 4 peer editing checklist
- peer editing checklist university of arizona
- expository writing self peer checklist
- persuasive essay editing checklist
- revision checklist for a narrative los angeles unified
Related searches
- peer editing checklist
- high school peer editing checklist
- peer editing checklist middle school
- peer editing form high school
- peer editing checklist elementary
- peer editing worksheet
- peer editing checklist pdf
- peer editing worksheet high school
- peer editing worksheet pdf
- middle school peer editing worksheet
- peer editing checklist high school
- middle school peer editing checklist