COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS



|

| |> |

| |> |

| |> |

| |

| |

| |

| |

<

| |

|< |> |

|< |> |

|< |> |

|< |> |

|< |> |

|< |> |

|< |> |

|< |> |

| |ACTION: |

| |Noting for the record that two Errata sheets have been submitted; ON MOTION of Supervisor Horn, seconded by Supervisor |

| |Roberts, the Board closed the Hearing, directed the Chief Administrative Officer to work with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife |

| |Service to see if land can be identified in the San Luis Rey River Valley as a first preference for mitigation as opposed to |

| |Rice Canyon; and took action as recommended, adopting Resolution No. 11-043, entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY|

| |BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ADOPTING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (GPA) 03-004; Resolution No. 11-044, entitled: RESOLUTION OF THE SAN |

| |DIEGO COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS APPROVING SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT SPA – SPA 03-008 CAMPUS PARK SPECIFIC PLAN; Resolution |

| |No. 11-045, entitled: RESOLUTION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY CONDITIONALLY APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE MAP NO. 3100-5338 RPL7(VTM); |

| |and Ordinance No. 10150 (N.S.), entitled: AN ORDINANCE CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| | |

|2. |SUBJECT: |2010 MULTIPLE SPECIES CONSERVATION PROGRAM ANNUAL REPORT (DISTRICTS: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |On October 22, 1997 (1), the Board adopted the County of San Diego Multiple Species Conservation Program South County Subarea|

| |Plan. The associated Implementing Agreement between the County of San Diego, California Department of Fish and Game and |

| |United States Fish and Wildlife Service became effective on March 17, 1998. The Implementing Agreement requires the County |

| |to prepare an annual accounting of 1) all habitat gained by acquisitions or dedication of open space through the land |

| |development process; and 2) all habitat lost as a result of discretionary land use and certain ministerial actions. |

| | |

| |The 2010 Multiple Species Conservation Program Annual Report summarizes habitat gains and losses within the South County |

| |Subarea Plan for the period of January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2010. This report also includes a discussion of |

| |management and monitoring programs and funding sources utilized by the County to meet its obligations under the Implementing |

| |Agreement. |

| | |

| |Today’s requested action is to receive the 2010 Multiple Species Conservation Program Annual Report. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |There is no fiscal impact associated with the Board’s acceptance of the 2010 Multiple Species Conservation Program Annual |

| |Report. |

| |BUSINESS IMPACT STATEMENT: |

| |N/A |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |Receive the 2010 Multiple Species Conservation Program Annual Report. |

| |ACTION: |

| |Received the 2010 Multiple Species Conservation Program Annual Report. |

|3. |SUBJECT: |ADVERTISE AND AWARD CONTRACT FOR REVEGETATION OF THE VALLEY CENTER ROAD BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION SITE |

| | |(DISTRICT: 5) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |The Valley Center Road Bridge is a new two-lane bridge over the San Luis Rey River in an easement on the Rincon Reservation |

| |in Valley Center (2007 Thomas Guide Page 1071, E4). Construction of the new bridge was completed in April 2011. Environmental|

| |Mitigation for the project requires the ten-acre project site to be revegetated with native vegetation in Fall 2011. |

| |This is a request to establish appropriations and approve advertisement and subsequent award to the lowest responsible bidder|

| |of a post construction revegetation contract for the Valley Center Road Bridge. Upon Board approval, the Department of |

| |Purchasing and Contracting will advertise and subsequently award a contract for post construction revegetation. The native |

| |landscaping is scheduled to be installed in Fall 2011 and will include ten acres of native trees, grassland, coastal sage |

| |scrub, and riparian vegetation communities that will enhance the San Luis Rey River ecosystem and provide habitat for |

| |sensitive species including the threatened southwestern arroyo toad. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |Funds for this request are not included in the Fiscal Year 2010-2011 Operational Plan, Department of Public Works, Detailed |

| |Work Program. If approved, total current year revegetation project costs will be $450,000 with no additional on-going cost |

| |and no additional staffing. The funding sources will be unanticipated revenue from the Federal Highway Administration Highway|

| |Bridge Program ($398,000) and available Road Fund fund balance ($52,000). There will be no impact to the General Fund. |

| | |

| |BUSINESS IMPACT STATEMENT: |

| |County construction contracts are competitively bid and help stimulate the local economy. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |Find, that the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for Valley Center Road Bridge Project over San Luis Rey River, SCH No. |

| |2003031048, dated September 21, 2006, on file in the Department of Public Works was adopted in compliance with California |

| |Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and state and County Guidelines, that the Board has reviewed and considered the information |

| |contained therein prior to approving the project, that the MND reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Board; |

| |and, |

| | |

| | |

| | |

| | |

| |Find that there are no changes in the project or in the circumstances, under which it is undertaken involving significant new|

| |environmental impacts not considered in the previously adopted MND, or a substantial increase in the severity of previously |

| |identified significant effects, and that no new information of substantial importance has become available since said MND was|

| |prepared. |

| | |

| |Establish appropriations of $398,000 in Department of Public Works Fiscal Year 10-11 Detailed Work Program for the Post |

| |Construction Revegetation of the Valley Center Road Bridge project site based on unanticipated revenue from Federal Highway |

| |Administration Highway Bridge Program Funds. (4 VOTES) |

| | |

| |Establish appropriations of $52,000 in the Department of Public Works Fiscal Year 10-11 Detailed Work Program for the Post |

| |Construction Revegetation of the Valley Center Road Bridge project site based on available Road Fund Balance. (4 VOTES) |

| | |

| |Authorize the Director, Department of Purchasing and Contracting, to take any action necessary to advertise and award a |

| |contract and to take other action authorized by Section 401 et seq., of the Administrative Code with respect to contracting |

| |for Revegetation of Valley Center Road Bridge Construction Site Project in Valley Center. |

| | |

| |Designate the Director, Department of Public Works, as County Officer responsible for administering the construction |

| |contract in accordance with Board Policy F-41, Public Works Construction Projects. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Slater-Price, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on |

| |Consent. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| | |

|4. |SUBJECT: |ADVERTISE AND AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR MCCLELLAN-PALOMAR AIRPORT ACCESS STAIRWAY (DISTRICT: 5) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |McClellan-Palomar Airport is a County-owned airport in Carlsbad (2009 Thomas Guide Page 1127, D-3) and is a major gateway to |

| |and from San Diego’s North County. |

| | |

| |The parking lots in the southwestern quadrant of the airport are located downhill from the terminal. There is an elevator |

| |that provides people access between the parking lots and the airport facilities. The proposed access stairway will further |

| |enhance pedestrian access between those parking lots and the airport facilities and will enhance convenience and the airport |

| |experience for the public. Total construction cost is estimated at $300,000 and is funded by the Airport Enterprise Fund. |

| | |

| |Today’s action will authorize the Director of Purchasing and Contracting to advertise and subsequently award to the lowest |

| |responsive and responsible bidder, a contract to construct an access stairway at McClellan-Palomar Airport. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |Funds for the construction of McClellan-Palomar Airport Access Stairway project are not included in the Fiscal Year 2010-11 |

| |Airport Enterprise Fund Spending Plan. If approved, this request will result in current year cost of $300,000. The funding |

| |source is fund balance available in the Airport Enterprise Fund. No additional staff years will be required, and there will |

| |be no impact to the County General Fund. |

| |BUSINESS IMPACT STATEMENT: |

| |County construction contracts are competitively bid and help stimulate the local economy. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |Find the proposed action is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section |

| |15311 of the State CEQA Guidelines. |

| |Amend the Fiscal Year 2010-11 Airport Enterprise Fund Spending Plan in the amount of $300,000 for the McClellan-Palomar |

| |Airport Access Stairway Project based on fund balance available. (4 VOTES) |

| |Authorize the Director, Department of Purchasing and Contracting, to take any action necessary to advertise and award a |

| |contract and to take other actions authorized by Section 401 et seq., of the Administrative Code with respect to contracting |

| |for subject public works project. |

| |Designate the Director, Department of Public Works, as the County Officer responsible for administering the construction |

| |contract in accordance with Board Policy F-41, Public Works Construction Projects. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Slater-Price, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on |

| |Consent. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| | |

|5. |SUBJECT: |MCCLELLAN-PALOMAR AIRPORT – FIRST AMENDMENT TO RETAIL GROUND LEASE WITH CSDI, LLC FOR PALOMAR COMMONS |

| | |PROJECT (DISTRICT: 5) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |McClellan-Palomar Airport, located in Carlsbad (2010 Thomas Guide Page 1127, E2), is a major gateway to and from San Diego’s |

| |North County. The Airport provides facilities and services to commercial, corporate and general aviation communities and is |

| |home to 341 aircraft. |

| | |

| |On October 13, 2010 (7), the Board approved a retail ground lease for 55 years, plus two 6.5-year options, with CSDI, LLC, |

| |for 16.99 acres at McClellan-Palomar Airport. The lease provides for development of Palomar Commons, a retail shopping |

| |center. The shopping center is planned to include a 153,974 square-foot Lowe’s home improvement store with a garden center, |

| |a bank, a gas convenience store, and 21,500 square feet of retail shops. |

| |This is a request to amend the lease to provide additional language regarding loans on the leasehold interest. Approval of |

| |the proposed amendment will allow CSDI, LLC to acquire favorable construction financing to develop the leasehold facilities. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |If approved, this request will have no fiscal impact and will require no additional staff years. |

| |BUSINESS IMPACT STATEMENT: |

| |N/A |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |Find that in the County’s review of the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared by the City of Carlsbad for the proposed |

| |Palomar Commons development (SCH No. 2010051074), per Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) |

| |Guidelines, there are no changes in the project or in the circumstances under which it is undertaken, in relation to the |

| |County’s discretionary action of approving this lease amendment, that involve significant new environmental impacts which |

| |were not considered in the previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration or a substantial increase in the severity of |

| |previously identified significant effects, and that no new information of substantial importance has become available since |

| |said Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. |

| |Approve and authorize the Clerk of the Board to execute, upon receipt, three copies of the First Amendment to Retail Ground |

| |Lease with CSDI, LLC. (4 VOTES) |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Slater-Price, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on |

| |Consent. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| | |

|6. |SUBJECT: |ADOPT A RESOLUTION SETTING A DATE FOR THE COMPLETION OF UNDERGROUNDING FOR ALPINE BOULEVARD UNDERGROUND |

| | |UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 111 (DISTRICT: 2) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |On May 12, 2010 (7), the Board of Supervisors adopted an Ordinance establishing Alpine Boulevard Underground Utility District |

| |No. 111 that enables the County to use 20A funds for undergrounding utilities in that area. These 20A funds are allocations |

| |from SDG&E that may be used by a local jurisdiction to undergrounding utility lines in areas of public benefit. Today’s Board |

| |action is to adopt a resolution setting May 1, 2012 as the date by which the utility companies must complete the necessary |

| |utility undergrounding and remove their overhead service facilities for the Alpine Boulevard Underground Utility District No. |

| |111 (2009 Thomas Guide Page 1234, B-6). |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |Utility companies underground their overhead lines at their own expense. Funds for formation and administration of these |

| |districts are budgeted in Department of Public Works General Fund, estimated at $2,000 current year cost and $1,000 subsequent|

| |year cost. Actual undergrounding project costs are estimated at $4 million, and will be paid from 20A funds, which are |

| |allocations from SDG&E for undergrounding in an Underground Utility District (UUD). The term 20A comes from Electric Rule 20 |

| |adopted by the CPUC in 1967, which set up the statewide undergrounding program. No additional staff years will be required. |

| |BUSINESS IMPACT STATEMENT: |

| |N/A |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |Find that the proposed project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as specified under Section |

| |15302(d) of the state CEQA Guidelines. |

| |Adopt a Resolution entitled Resolution Setting Dates For Undergrounding In Underground Utility District No. 111, Alpine |

| |Boulevard. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Slater-Price, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on |

| |Consent, adopting Resolution No. 11-046, entitled: RESOLUTION SETTING DATES FOR UNDERGROUNDING IN UNDERGROUND UTILITY |

| |DISTRICT NO. 111, ALPINE BOULEVARD. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| | |

|7. |SUBJECT: |GILLESPIE FIELD – NEW 30-YEAR AVIATION LEASE WITH RAVEN AERONAUTICAL HOLDINGS, LLC. (DISTRICT: 2) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |The County of San Diego operates Gillespie Field (2010 Thomas Guide, Page 1251, E-2), a general aviation airport in El |

| |Cajon. Gillespie Field conducts approximately 209,000 take offs and landings annually and provides facilities for 964 general|

| |aviation and corporate aircraft. The airport accommodates various aviation businesses providing service to the aviation |

| |community, general public and supports public safety services such as the Sheriff’s Air Support facility and Lifeflight |

| |Helicopter. |

| | |

| |On March 31, 1998 (53), the Board approved a 30-year aviation ground lease at Gillespie Field with Royal Jet, Inc, who |

| |improved the leasehold with aircraft hangars, ramps and offices. The lease was assigned in June 2005 to Jet Air FBO, LLC (Jet|

| |Air). Jet Air recently invested $350,000 to rehabilitate the existing fuel farm including installation of new tanks that |

| |comply with updated requirements. Jet Air requested a new lease to give additional time to recoup the fuel farm investment |

| |and to provide stability for future business plans. While in negotiations for the new lease, Jet Air decided to sell its |

| |business to Raven Aeronautical Holdings, LLC (Raven Aeronautical). The sale would be subject to the County granting a new 30|

| |year lease which would supersede the existing Jet Air lease. Jet Air and Raven Aeronautical requested the County issue the |

| |proposed lease to Raven Aeronautical. Both the sale of the business and the new lease would be effective simultaneously at |

| |close of escrow. |

| |This is a request to approve a new 30-year aviation ground lease for 8.8 acres at Gillespie Field with Raven Aeronautical. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |If approved, this request will result in additional revenue of $1,146,397 to the Fiscal Year 2010-11 Airport Enterprise Fund |

| |spending plan. The funding source is equity and increased rental payments received under the terms of the new lease |

| |agreement. Revenue for subsequent years will be $74,360 in Fiscal Year 2011-12 and $81,180 in Fiscal Year 2012-13. There |

| |will be no impact to the General Fund and no additional staff years required. |

| |BUSINESS IMPACT STATEMENT: |

| |N/A |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |Find in accordance with Section 15301 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines that proposed lease is |

| |categorically exempt from CEQA provisions as it involves continuation of existing use. |

| | |

| |Approve and authorize Clerk of the Board to execute, upon receipt, three copies of the aviation lease with Raven Aeronautical|

| |Holdings, LLC. (4 VOTES) |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Slater-Price, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board of Supervisors continued the item to May 25, |

| |2011 at the request of the Chief Administrative Officer, on Consent. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| | |

|8. |SUBJECT: |TRAFFIC ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS (DISTRICTS: 1, 2 & 5) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |The Traffic Advisory Committee meets every six weeks to review proposed additions, deletions or changes to regulatory traffic |

| |controls. Thirteen items were on the Committee's March 11, 2011 meeting agenda. The Committee recommends your action on all 13|

| |items. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |Funds for this proposal are included in the Department of Public Works Road Fund current year Operational Plan. If approved, |

| |there will be no change in net General Fund cost and require no additional staff years. |

| |BUSINESS IMPACT STATEMENT: |

| |N/A |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |TRAFFIC ADVISORY COMMITTEE |

| |District 1 |

| |1-A. East H Street between the Chula Vista City Limits, (2010 Thomas Guide Page 1310, E-6) CHULA VISTA -- Do not establish a |

| |formal speed limit on the County-maintained portion and support the Chula Vista City Council’s formal action to change an |

| |existing 40 MPH to 45 MPH within its jurisdiction. |

| | |

| |District 2 |

| |2-A. Hanson Lane and Ramona Street, (2010 Thomas Guide Page 1172, F-1) RAMONA -- Do not establish an all-way stop control. |

| |2-B. Westhill Road and Marilla Drive, (2010 Thomas Guide Page 1231, H-5) LAKESIDE -- Do not establish an all-way stop |

| |control. |

| |2-C. Wildcat Canyon Road from the south line of San Vicente Road southerly to the north line of Willow Road, (2010 Thomas |

| |Guide Page 1192, A-5) RAMONA/LAKESIDE -- Establish a permanent “Daylight Headlight Section.” |

| |2-D. Hillsdale Road from Chase Avenue easterly to Vista Grande Road, (2010 Thomas Guide Page 1272, B-3) EL CAJON -- Direct |

| |the existing 40 MPH speed limit be recertified for continued radar speed enforcement. |

| |2-E. Rolling Hills Drive between Horizon Hills Drive and Fuerte Drive, (2010 Thomas Guide Page 1271, H-2) EL CAJON -- Direct |

| |the existing 35 MPH speed limit be recertified for continued radar speed enforcement. |

| | |

| |District 5 |

| |5-A. South Mission Road and Fallbrook Towne Center Driveway, (2010 Thomas Guide Page 1027, F-3) FALLBROOK -- Do not place |

| |intersection on the County’s Traffic Signal Priority List. |

| |5-B. Buena Creek Road from the east line of South Santa Fe Avenue easterly to the west line of Monte Vista Drive, (2010 |

| |Thomas Guide Page 1108, D-1) VISTA -- Direct the existing 35 MPH speed limit be recertified for continued radar speed |

| |enforcement. |

| |5-C. Buena Creek Road from the east line of Monte Vista Drive easterly to the west line of Cassou Road, (2010 Thomas Guide |

| |Page 1108, D-1) VISTA -- Direct the existing 45 MPH speed limit be recertified for continued radar speed enforcement. |

| |5-D. Buena Creek Road from the east line of Cassou Road easterly to the San Marcos city limit, (2010 Thomas Guide Page 1108, |

| |G-1) VISTA -- Direct the existing 50 MPH speed limit be recertified for continued radar speed enforcement. |

| |5-E. Via de Santa Fe from the south line of Via de la Valle southerly to the north line of Calzada del Bosque, (2010 Thomas |

| |Guide Page 1168, E-3) RANCHO SANTA FE -- Direct the existing 40 MPH speed limit be recertified for continued radar speed |

| |enforcement. |

| |5-F. San Dieguito Road from the south line of El Apajo southerly to the San Diego city limit, (2010 Thomas Guide Page 1168, |

| |F-6) FAIRBANKS RANCH -- Direct the existing 50 MPH speed limit be recertified for continued radar speed enforcement. |

| | |

| | |

| |5-G. Stage Coach Lane from the east line of Mission Road southeasterly to a point 1,580 feet south of Calavo Road, (2010 |

| |Thomas Guide Page 1027, G-7) FALLBROOK -- Direct the existing 40 MPH speed limit be recertified for continued radar speed |

| |enforcement. |

| | |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |Find that the proposed project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as specified under Section 15301|

| |of the state CEQA Guidelines. |

| |Concur with Traffic Advisory Committee’s recommendations. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Slater-Price, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on |

| |Consent. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| | |

|9. |SUBJECT: |APPROVE FISCAL YEAR 2011-2012 REVENUE AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA WATER RESOURCES CONTROL |

| | |BOARD FOR THE LEAKING UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS PROGRAM (DISTRICTS: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |On May 12, 2010 (6) the Board of Supervisors approved and authorized the Director of Environmental Health to execute a |

| |revenue agreement with the California Water Resources Control Board for the period July 1, 2010 through June 30, 2011. The |

| |Local Oversight Program of the Department of Environmental Health enforces the cleanup of spills associated with leaking |

| |underground fuel storage tanks, thereby protecting the region’s groundwater resources. Acceptance of this program is at the |

| |Board of Supervisors’ discretion. The Program has been funded through a succession of annual revenue agreements with the |

| |State of California since 1988. |

| | |

| |The Department of Environmental Health is seeking Board approval for the Fiscal Year 2011-12 revenue agreement with the State|

| |of California Water Resources Control Board to continue oversight activities for sites contaminated by underground storage |

| |tank leaks throughout the County, in an amount of $2,214,797. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |Funds for this request are included in the Fiscal Year 2011-13 CAO Proposed Operational Plan for the Department of |

| |Environmental Health. If approved, this request will result in $2,214,797 in cost and revenue for Fiscal Year 2011-2012. The|

| |funding source is the revenue agreement with State Water Resources Control Board. This is a full cost recovery agreement and|

| |will require no additional staff years. |

| |BUSINESS IMPACT STATEMENT: |

| |This program benefits business by ensuring that cleanups meet State and local standards, enabling tank owners or operators to|

| |be reimbursed for costs through the State Water Resources Control Board’s Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Fund. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |In accordance with Section 15061(b)(3) of the State of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, find that it |

| |can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility this project may have a significant effect on the environment and |

| |that it is therefore exempt from CEQA. |

| | |

| |Approve and authorize the Director, Department of Environmental Health, to execute a revenue agreement with the State of |

| |California Water Resources Control Board, in an amount of $2,214,797 for the period of July 1, 2011 through June|

| |30, 2012, to fund the Local Oversight Program and oversee remedial action and cleanup from underground storage tank leaks. |

| | |

| |Authorize the Director, Department of Environmental Health, to execute any extensions, amendments, and or revisions thereof |

| |that do not materially impact or alter either the program or funding level. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Slater-Price, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on |

| |Consent. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| | |

| |

|< |> |

|< |> |

|< |> |

|< |> |

|< |> |

|< |> |

|< |> |

|< |> |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Cox, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Horn |

| |ABSENT: Roberts |

| | |

| |

|< |> |

|< |> |

|< |> |

|< |> |

|< |> |

|< |> |

|< |> |

|< |> |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Slater-Price, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board took action as recommended, adopting Resolution|

| |No. 11-047, entitled: RESOLUTION OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO AUTHORIZING THE BORROWING OF FUNDS BY THE COUNTY FOR FISCAL YEAR|

| |2011-2012 AND THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF A 2011 TAX AND REVENUE ANTICIPATION NOTE IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $75,000,000 AND |

| |PARTICIPATION IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO AND SAN DIEGO COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICTS TAX AND REVENUE ANTICIPATION NOTE PROGRAM; and|

| |Resolution No. 11-048, entitled: RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO PROVIDING FOR THE |

| |BORROWING OF FUNDS BY CERTAIN SCHOOL DISTRICTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011-2012 THROUGH THE EXECUTION BY THE COUNTY OF CERTAIN 2011 |

| |TAX AND REVENUE ANTICIPATION NOTES AND THE PARTICIPATION BY SUCH SCHOOL DISTRICTS IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO AND SAN DIEGO |

| |COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICTS TAX AND REVENUE ANTICIPATION NOTE PROGRAM. |

| | |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

|< |> |

|< |> |

| |ACTION: |

| |In Closed Session on Wednesday, May 11, 2011, the Board of Supervisors took the following actions, reportable under |

| |Government Code §54957.1: |

| | |

| |Item 12B: City of Santee v. County of San Diego, by “yes” votes of the 4 members of the Board who were present, with |

| |District 2 absent, the Board authorized County Counsel to refrain from seeking appellate review of an order of the Superior |

| |Court in that matter, denying the County’s request for reimbursement of $24,412 incurred in responding to the City of |

| |Santee’s request for records. |

| | |

| | |

| |Item 12E: A matter involving the initiation of an action, by “yes” votes of the 4 members of the Board who were present, |

| |with District 2 absent, the Board authorized the County to initiate an action, the particulars of which will be disclosed |

| |according to the provisions of Government Code §54957.1, subdivision (a)(2). |

There being no further business, the Board adjourned at 11:40 a.m. in the memory of Mac Hartley, Shelly Ann Hilliker, LaVoyne Jackson, John Holsenback, Norman Seltzer, Patricia Mae Morse, and Beverly Lewis.

THOMAS J. PASTUSZKA

Clerk of the Board of Supervisors

County of San Diego, State of California

Consent: Vizcarra

Discussion: Mazyck

NOTE: This Statement of Proceedings sets forth all actions taken by the County of San Diego Board of Supervisors on the matters stated, but not necessarily the chronological sequence in which the matters were taken up.

>>>

................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download