Explain and Assess the Importance of social relationships ...
Explain and Assess the Importance of social relationships and gender roles in the Ramesside period including the social structure and the roles of males and females.
The social structure of the Ramesside period was much like any other civilisation. A strict hierarchy that defined the roles of men and women existed at all levels of society from the royal family down to the lower classes. Despite the fact that women within the royal family enjoyed elite privileges, the roles and responsibilities of women to men were much the same throughout the classes. The role of men within the social structure of the Ramesside period, carried with them expectations as workers, administrators and rulers.
“In the Egyptian world view, the organisation of society was hierarchical”[1]. What presided over the entire social structure was the “divine world”[2] in which itself was a strict order. The pharaoh personified this position and by sharing certain attributes with the gods, he acted as a mediator between the divine and human spheres. The role of the pharaoh within the Ramesside period continued its similarity from the Eighteenth Dynasty into the Ramesside period, with the “significant but gradual change in the nature and strength of the royal power seems to become evident first in the late nineteenth dynasty and increasingly in the twentieth dynasty”[3] Members of the pharaoh’s family were also identified as part of the interdependent hierarchical group within society. The status of the pharaoh within the social structure of Egypt is an area of distinct change once entering into Dynasty Twenty and resulted in a reduction in status. Wenamun’s narrative is the most useful source in providing an understanding of the pharaoh’s decline by the end of Dynasty Twenty. By the time of the reign of Ramesses XI, the pharaoh no longer attended the great festivals occurring on the West Bank at Karnak, resulting in a dramatic change in the traditional roles effecting the powers held within the social hierarchy of the royal administration. The unfurnished tomb of Ramesses XI provides a strong indication of decline of social, religious and political status of the pharaoh within the social order of Egypt.
The nobility which comprised of one per cent of the population[4] followed in the social hierarchy behind the pharaoh. The men within this social group formed the bureaucracy of Egypt, and held responsibilities predominantly within the administrative sectors of the Egyptian government, such as taxation.
The relationship with those who held high posts were often family members, as can be seen with Rekhmire who followed his uncle in holding office. However this is an area in which evident change had occurred between the early New Kingdom and the Ramesside period. Viziers of Dynasty XX did not seem to have any hereditary links with each other[5], therefore showing signs of a break in Egyptian custom and a distinct change in government administration.
Despite the moving of the capital to Per Ramesse in the nineteenth and twentieth dynasties, the vizier of the south continued to enjoy equal status with the vizier of the north. The significant increase with the roles of the vizier altered the power structures within the responsibilities of the royal government. The Installation of the Vizier and The Duties of the Vizier are important in assessing the roles of the vizier, and appeared in nineteenth dynasty tombs such as Paser,[6] - “it is he who dispatches every official of the royal domain and who sends to nomarchs and heads of division”.[7] Further, the Papyrus Lansing is a useful source in providing an understanding of the social position of the scribes. Although this text is bias and glorifies the position of the scribe, it allows for an understanding of the position of the scribe within the social hierarchy of New Kingdom society, - “It is worth more than an inheritance in Egypt, than a tomb in the West”. [8]
One of the fundamental changes to the roles of men within the social structure of the royal family according to Callender was the change in types of people serving as officials. During the reign of Akhenaten, there was, as Callender argues, “a complete turnover in officials. Many of his bureaucrats were unknown from Theban sources, yet he held a high position at Akhetaten”. This perspective provides an understanding that there were a vast number of capable and literate men who obtained the ability to assume the important roles as officials in the land. By the end of the nineteenth dynasty, the role of the Asiatics was noticeable within the social order of the government administration. The roles of the Asiatics can be perceived as a broadened scene of the Ramesside period, as this era saw a gradual influx of Asiatic people who were possibly responding to the pressures of the Sea People.
The relationship between males and females of Egyptian society, amongst the lower classes was “bounded by the domestic framework, concerned with familial, private sectors of society”.[9] Given that the dominance of men could perpetuate their masculine control within the public and political climate of Egypt, women had difficulty in gaining entrance or even being acknowledged within these fields, especially within the lower classes. Since the social structure of Egyptian society was ranked hierarchically, women too were ranked hierarchically[10]. The clear similarity between women of the different social structures within the society was, as Robins argues, that women of the royal family, the elite scribal class, minor professional classes and of the peasantry was that they all simply had the ability to bear children.[11] The roles of women within the peasantry class provided them with little to no power. Being the poorest class economically, women within the unskilled workers were always at the receiving end of authority, and this role continued throughout the New Kingdom and into the Ramesside period. However, women of the elite scribal classes did have more access to economic resources, however being closer to the bureaucratic powers of the male influences in her family, women were still subjugated to the tradition social roles. Women within areas of the skilled working class did contribute to the social order of society. The Tomb of Ipy[12] reveals women conducting trade up and down the Nile.
The division and gradual disintegration of the social order within Egypt was, according to David O’Conner, due to the “political weakness of the religious system”[13] but the fault of the “military officers, not priests”[14] which were responsible for the change in the social structures of Egypt. However this view is opposed by Barbara Lesko who argues that it was the growth of the power of the Amun priesthood[15] that contributed to the gradual disintegration of the social order. This argument is carried further with Robins’ comment that it was the decline in the royal religious authority, military prestige, and political powers[16] which resulted in the change to the social structures of the Ramesside period. It was not a dramatic upheaval that occurred within society however, but this social change predominantly occurred within the royal administration. The pharaoh’s reduction in status was due to the diminished responsibilities he held, not the prestige in his divine right.
The distinct changes within the Ramesside period following the New Kingdom society within the social structure of Egypt can be firstly seen in the role of the pharaoh. His divine principal remained throughout the entire period of Egyptian society, however it was his administering and governing position that changed. The pharaoh no longer had complete control and authority of the empire, and power was divided between him and the vizier. This reciprocates onto the social structure of the Ramesside period, and increased the power wielded by the vizier. The roles of women within the Ramesside period remained fairly consistent throughout the period, showing evident signs of continuity throughout the New Kingdom and Ramesside periods. Ultimately, the subsequent deterioration of the pharaoh’s social status proved to be the decisive factor in the altering of the hierarchy of the social structure within the Ramesside period.
-----------------------
[1] Robins, G Women in Ancient Egypt Cambridge University Press 1993 pg. 16
[2] ibid. Pg. 16
[3] O’Connor, D Ancient Egypt: A Social History 1983 Cambridge University Press pg. 205
[4] ibid. Pg. 16
[5] Callender, G The Eye of Horus Longman Australia, 1993, pg. 289
[6] O’Connor, op.cit pg. 246
[7] Breasted, JH Ancient Records of Egypt. University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1906 pg. 273
[8] Ibid, pg. 273
[9] Jablow, A et al Women: Their Economic Role in Traditional Societies. 1973 pg.167
[10] Robins, G op.cit pg. 19
[11] ibid, pg. 19
[12] ibid, pg 52
[13] O’Connor, D op.cit pg. 187
[14] ibid, pg. 187
[15] Lesko, B op.cit Pg 77
[16] Robins, G op.cit pg 115
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
- lesson 4 relationships
- explain and assess the importance of social relationships
- relationships are important for our health handout
- seven elements of the social work relationship
- cultural and social psychologists recognize the importance
- relationships at midlife
- horizontal and vertical social relationships
- unit 513 manage health and social care practice to ensure
Related searches
- explain the importance of marketing
- the importance of social science
- explain the importance of photosynthesis
- explain the importance of referencing
- the importance of social studies
- explain the importance of management
- explain the importance of planning
- explain the importance of internet
- importance of human relationships social work
- the importance of social morality
- explain the importance of ecd
- the importance of relationships quotes