COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
STATEMENT OF PROCEEDINGS
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
REGULAR MEETING
TUESDAY, JUNE 15, 2004, 9:00 AM
Board of Supervisors North Chamber
1600 Pacific Highway, Room 310, San Diego, California
MORNING SESSION: - Meeting was called to order at 9:10 a.m.
Present: Supervisors Dianne Jacob, Chairwoman; Pam Slater-Price, Vice Chairwoman; Greg Cox; Ron Roberts; Bill Horn; also Thomas J. Pastuszka, Clerk.
Invocation led by Father Mark Earl of the Saint Philip-the-Apostle Parish in Lemon Grove.
Pledge of Allegiance led by Noel Miller, Jewell Ellison, Chelsea Hemingway, Xena Horne, and Brynli McBride of the El Cajon Daisy Girl Scout Troup #6002.
Approval of Statement of Proceedings/Minutes for the Meeting of May 11, 2004 and May 18, 2004.
ACTION:
ON MOTION of Supervisor Horn, seconded by Supervisor Slater-Price, the Board of Supervisors approved the Statement of Proceedings/Minutes for the Meeting of May 11, 2004 and May 18, 2004.
AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn
Public Communication: [No Speakers]
|Category |Agenda No. |Subject |
|Public Safety |1. |FOCUS ON FEMALE METHAMPHETAMINE USE |
| | | |
| |2. |DISTRICT ATTORNEY – CRIMINAL RESTITUTION COMPACT CONTRACT WITH THE STATE OF |
| | |CALIFORNIA VICTIM COMPENSATION AND GOVERNMENT CLAIMS BOARD |
| | | |
| |3. |DISTRICT ATTORNEY – STATE SEIZED ASSET FORFEITURE PROGRAM |
| | |[FUNDING SOURCE(S): DISTRICT ATTORNEY STATE SEIZED ASSET FORFEITURE FUND BALANCE] |
| | |(4 VOTES) |
| | | |
| |4. |SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT ACCEPTANCE OF A GRANT FROM THE INDIAN GAMING LOCAL COMMUNITY |
| | |BENEFIT COMMITTEE AND REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR THE ACQUISITION OF A HELICOPTER |
| | |[FUNDING SOURCE(S): GRANT FROM IGLCBC AND ASTREA TRUST FUND] |
| | | |
| |5. |REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS TO ACQUIRE A FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY HELICOPTER |
| | | |
| |6. |SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT’S ACCEPTANCE OF DONATION AND REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF OUT OF |
| | |COUNTRY BUSINESS |
| | | |
| |7. |SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR THE PROCUREMENT OF HOSPITAL GUARD SERVICES |
| | | |
| |8. |OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES – HOMELAND SECURITY GRANTS APPLICATION AND ACCEPTANCE|
| | | |
| | |[FUNDING SOURCE(S): STATE OF CALIFORNIA STATE HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM] |
| | | |
| |9. |OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES - GRANT ACCEPTANCE – FEMA SUPPLEMENTAL GRANT AND THE |
| | |ALCOA FOUNDATION FOR COMMUNITY EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM DEVELOPMENT |
| | |[FUNDING SOURCE(S): THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA GOSERV CERT PROGRAM AND REVENUE OF |
| | |ALCOA FOUNDATION] |
| | | |
| |10. |OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES GRANT ACCEPTANCE – PRE-DISASTER MITIGATION |
| | |COMPETITIVE GRANT PROGRAM |
| | |[FUNDING SOURCE(S): FEMA PRE-DISASTER MITIGATION COMPETITIVE GRANT] |
| | | |
| |11. |PROBATION DEPARTMENT: PUTTING JUVENILE OFFENDERS BACK ON TRACK |
| | |(4 VOTES) |
| | | |
|Land Use & Environment |12. |AGREEMENTS WITH SELECTED RECIPIENTS OF INDIAN GAMING SPECIAL DISTRIBUTION FUND |
| | |GRANTS |
| | | |
|Health & Human Services |13. |FUNDING FOR PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF EDGEMOOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITY |
| | |[FUNDING SOURCE(S): UNSECURITIZED TOBACCO SETTLEMENT TRUST FUND] |
| | |(4 VOTES) |
| | | |
| |14. |PROCUREMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH LABORATORY SUPPLIES |
| | |[FUNDING SOURCE(S): HEALTH REALIGNMENT REVENUES] |
| | | |
| |15. |DONATIONS TO THE HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY FOR THE A.B. AND JESSIE POLINSKY|
| | |CHILDREN'S CENTER |
| | | |
| |16. |IN-HOME SUPPORTIVE SERVICES PUBLIC AUTHORITY INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT |
| | |[FUNDING SOURCE(S): IN-HOME SUPPORTIVE SERVICES PUBLIC AUTHORITY] |
| | |(RELATES TO IN-HOME SUPPORTIVE SERVICES PUBLIC AUTHORITY AGENDA NO. 1) |
| | | |
|Community Services |17. |LEASE AGREEMENT FOR HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY NORTH CENTRAL MENTAL HEALTH |
| | |CLINIC AND CASE MANAGEMENT, 1250 MORENA BOULEVARD, SAN DIEGO |
| | |[FUNDING SOURCE(S): HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY, MENTAL HEALTH REALIGNMENT |
| | |FOR ALL FISCAL YEARS] |
| | | |
| |18. |SET HEARING FOR 7/13/04 |
| | |INTENTION TO ENTER INTO AN OPTION TO PURCHASE AND SALE OF SURPLUS REAL PROPERTY – |
| | |COUNTY PARCEL 2003-0300-A - BUSINESS PARK DRIVE, VISTA |
| | |(4 VOTES) |
| | | |
|Financial & General Government |19. |LOCAL COMMUNITY PROJECTS |
| | | |
| |20. |ALLOCATION OF COMMUNITY PROJECTS FUNDS |
| | | |
| |21. |NOTICED PUBLIC HEARING: |
| | |ISSUANCE OF TAX-EXEMPT BONDS BY THE ASSOCIATION OF BAY AREA GOVERNMENTS FINANCE |
| | |AUTHORITY FOR ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO |
| | | |
| |22. |APPROVAL OF THE FINANCING DOCUMENTS FOR THE 2004 PENSION OBLIGATION BONDS |
| | | |
| |23. |RETIREMENT BOARD ELECTION – THIRD (GENERAL) MEMBERS |
| | | |
| |24. |AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPENSATION ORDINANCE |
| | | |
| |25. |SUNSET REVIEW OF BOARD POLICIES ASSIGNED TO THE FINANCE AND GENERAL GOVERNMENT |
| | |GROUP |
| | | |
| |26. |NOTICED PUBLIC HEARING: |
| | |CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE: HIGH TECH MIDDLE |
| | | |
|Communications Received |27. |COMMUNICATIONS RECEIVED |
| | | |
|Appointments |28. |ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM: |
| | |APPOINTMENTS |
| | | |
|Closed Session |29. |CLOSED SESSION |
| | | |
|Financial & General Government |30. |RESOLUTION EXTENDING TIME FOR BUDGET HEARINGS |
| | | |
|Presentations/Awards |31. |PRESENTATIONS/AWARDS |
| | | |
|1. |SUBJECT: |FOCUS ON FEMALE METHAMPHETAMINE USE (DISTRICTS: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |Use of the intense stimulant methamphetamine is soaring in communities across the nation. In many areas, explosive labs and |
| |ruthless dealers have stretched resources dangerously thin. In San Diego County however, problems associated with meth are |
| |holding relatively steady. Regional law enforcement agencies report fewer seizures of toxic meth labs. Still, the artificial |
| |stimulant remains the illicit drug-of-choice among lawbreakers in the region, fueling crime, violence and disorder. |
| | |
| |Since its inception in 1996, the County of San Diego Methamphetamine Strike Force has tackled meth-related community problems |
| |with measurable success. Recently, Strike Force officials have become concerned about the number of females using meth. In 2002,|
| |37 percent of women arrested for crimes in San Diego County tested positive for meth at the time of their arrest. |
| | |
| |There is a need to explore the dangerous bond between meth and women who enter the region’s criminal justice system. By |
| |deepening our understanding of this particular drug, we can develop more calculated ways to lessen its historic chokehold on our |
| |region. |
| | |
| |Approval of this item will authorize County staff to work with the Methamphetamine Strike Force to develop a Board-hosted |
| |conference on female meth use. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |There is no fiscal impact associated with the proposal. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHAIRWOMAN JACOB AND DISTRICT ATTORNEY: |
| |Direct the Chief Administrative Officer to work with the Methamphetamine Strike Force to conduct a Board-hosted conference on |
| |female meth use. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Slater-Price, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on |
| |Consent. |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|2. |SUBJECT: |DISTRICT ATTORNEY – CRIMINAL RESTITUTION COMPACT CONTRACT WITH THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA VICTIM |
| | |COMPENSATION AND GOVERNMENT CLAIMS BOARD (DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |Your Board approved the Criminal Restitution Compact (CRC) contract on June 11, 2002 (13). This contract is funded by the |
| |California Victim Compensation and Government Claims Board (State Board) and supports the mission and goals of the Restitution |
| |Enforcement & Victim Services Division of the District Attorney that seeks to restore losses incurred by victims of crime and to |
| |return what was taken from them as the result of crimes. |
| |This request is to approve the CRC contract with the California Victim Compensation and Government Claims Board in the total |
| |amount of $267,798 for Fiscal Year 2004-05. If approved, this request will support the District Attorney’s restitution |
| |enforcement program and will help accomplish the District Attorney’s vision of achieving justice and creating a safe and livable |
| |community for the San Diego region. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |The funds for the CRC contract are included in the FY 2004-05 CAO Proposed Operational Plan. The annual cost of the program is |
| |$404,359 offset by $267,798 in revenue from the State Board for a net cost of $136,561. The Governor’s proposed budget does not |
| |impact this funding source. Approval of this request will not require the addition of staff. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |DISTRICT ATTORNEY: |
| |Waive Board Police B-29, Fees, Grants, and Revenue Contracts – Department responsibility for cost recovery, which requires full |
| |cost recovery for grants. |
| |Ratify the signature of the Chairwoman of the Board of Supervisors on the Grant Award Face Sheet and adopt the Resolution |
| |approving the Criminal Restitution Compact with the State of California Victim Compensation and Government Claims Board in the |
| |amount of $267,798 for Fiscal Year 2004-05. |
| |Authorize execution by the Clerk of the Board, on extensions and amendments that do not materially impact or alter either the |
| |grant program or funding level. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Slater-Price, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on |
| |Consent, adopting Resolution No. 04-100 entitled: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY CRIMINAL |
| |RESTITUTION COMPACT WITH CALIFORNIA VICTIM COMPENSATION AND GOVERNMENT CLAIMS BOARD. |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|3. |SUBJECT: |DISTRICT ATTORNEY – STATE SEIZED ASSET FORFEITURE PROGRAM (DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |The District Attorney is requesting appropriations of $5,000 from the District Attorney’s State Seized Asset Forfeiture Fund to |
| |pay for the one-time printing and publishing costs of the District Attorney’s 2003 Annual Report. This Annual Report will |
| |deliver the District Attorney’s vision of creating a safe and livable community for the San Diego region. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |Funds for this request are not included in the District Attorney’s Fiscal Year 2003-04 Adopted Operational Plan. If approved, |
| |this request will result in direct costs and revenue of $5,000 in Fiscal Year 2003-04 and will not require the addition of staff |
| |years. The funding source for this proposal is District Attorney State Seized Asset Forfeiture Fund Balance. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |DISTRICT ATTORNEY: |
| |Waive Board Policy A-91, Mid-Year Budget Changes. |
| |Establish appropriations of $5,000 in the District Attorney’s General Fund, for services and supplies, based upon an operating |
| |transfer from the District Attorney’s State Seized Asset Forfeiture Fund. (4 Votes) |
| |Establish appropriations of $5,000 in the District Attorney’s State Seized Asset Forfeiture Fund, Operating Transfer Out, to |
| |reimburse the District Attorney’s General Fund for incurred services and supplies costs, based upon available State Seized Asset |
| |Forfeiture Fund Balance. (4 Votes) |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Slater-Price, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on |
| |Consent. |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|4. |SUBJECT: |SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT ACCEPTANCE OF A GRANT FROM THE INDIAN GAMING LOCAL COMMUNITY BENEFIT COMMITTEE AND |
| | |REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR THE ACQUISITION OF A HELICOPTER |
| | |(DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |During the wildfires of October 2003, it was clearly demonstrated that San Diego County needs new firefighting resources that |
| |will not be diverted to other regions. The San Diego Sheriff’s Department operates Aerial Support to Regional Enforcement |
| |Agencies (ASTREA), delivering search and rescue, fire suppression, and law enforcement support to all public safety agencies in |
| |the region. All of the helicopters in the current ASTREA fleet are Type III helicopters. |
| |The Sheriff’s Department submitted a grant application and has been awarded $1,500,000 from the Indian Gaming Local Community |
| |Benefit Committee (IGLCBC) for the acquisition of a Type II, medium lift turbine helicopter to augment the Sheriff’s Aviation |
| |Detail. The Type II helicopter has a significantly larger water capacity than the Type III helicopters currently used in ASTREA.|
| |Funds for this grant will come from the Barona, Sycuan and Viejas Tribes. An additional $400,000 identified from the Sheriff’s |
| |ASTREA Trust Fund can be applied towards the $1,900,000 estimated acquisition and outfitting cost. First year operating costs |
| |would be approximately $100,000 for the period of May 1, 2005 through June 30, 2005. Adequate services and supplies |
| |appropriations are included within the proposed FY 2004-05 budget for the Sheriff’s Department to cover the first year operating |
| |cost. Ongoing annual operational costs for fuel, maintenance, insurance, etc. would total $600,000 and the Sheriff recommends |
| |that the Board utilize a portion of the $2,100,000 in ongoing funding established for helicopter operations pursuant to the |
| |Board’s action taken on February 10, 2004 (1). The Sheriff will utilize existing staff to fly and maintain the new helicopter. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |Funds for this request are not budgeted. If approved, this request will result in $2,000,000 in costs during Fiscal Year 2004/05|
| |($1,900,000 for the helicopter acquisition and $100,000 for two months operating costs). The funding sources for the acquisition|
| |are a $1,500,000 grant from IGLCBC and $400,000 from the Sheriff’s ASTREA Trust Fund. First year operating costs of $100,000 can|
| |be absorbed within the Sheriff’s proposed FY 2004-05 services and supplies budget, and are based on general purpose revenues. |
| |Ongoing annual operating expenses estimated at $600,000 for fuel, insurance and maintenance can be funded utilizing a portion of |
| |the ongoing funding set aside pursuant to the Board’s action on February 10, 2004 (1); $2,100,000 is included in the 2004-05 |
| |proposed budget for fire fighting helicopter operations utilizing general purpose revenue. This action will require the addition|
| |of no staff years and there is no local match requirement for this grant. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |SHERIFF: |
| |Ratify the Sheriff’s Department submission and authorize the acceptance of a grant from the IGLCBC in the amount of $1,500,000. |
| |Authorize the Sheriff to execute the IGLCBC grant documents and any extensions, amendments or revisions thereof that do not |
| |materially impact or alter either the grant program or funding level. |
| |Direct the Chief Administrative Officer to prepare a Budget Change Letter for consideration during FY 2004/05 budget |
| |deliberations for the purpose of establishing $1,900,000 of appropriations within the Sheriff’s Department for the purchase and |
| |outfitting of a Type II medium-lift turbine helicopter based on revenue of $1,500,000 from a grant from IGLCBC and $400,000 in |
| |the ASTREA Trust Fund, and to earmark a $600,000 portion of the $2,100,000 in ongoing general purpose revenue identified pursuant|
| |to the Board’s action on February 10, 2004 (1) for annual ongoing fire fighting helicopter operating costs in FY 2005-06 and |
| |beyond. |
| |In accordance with Section 401, Article XXIII of the County Administrative Code authorize the Director, Department of Purchasing |
| |and Contracting to: 1) Issue a Competitive Solicitation to acquire a Type II medium-lift turbine helicopter from the private |
| |sector and to negotiate a total price for such a helicopter to be outfitted pursuant to the Sheriff’s specifications; 2) |
| |Simultaneously solicit a proposal from the California Department of Forestry (CDF) to acquire a Federal Excess Personal Property |
| |(FEPP) Type II medium-lift turbine helicopter, and to adjust such cost by the amount the Sheriff determines to be necessary to |
| |outfit such FEPP helicopter for total price comparison purposes; and 3) Subject to successful negotiations and determination of a|
| |fair and reasonable price to acquire a Type II medium-lift turbine helicopter and any necessary outfitting, make all necessary |
| |contract award(s) and outfit the helicopter following the Sheriff’s determination as to which option for providing the helicopter|
| |is most efficient and effective. |
| |Authorize the Sheriff to enter into agreements with the California Department of Forestry as well as local fire agencies for |
| |purposes of aerial deployment of firefighting personnel. |
| |Authorize the Sheriff to enter into agreements with the Barona, Sycuan and Viejas Tribes to ensure that equipment acquired with |
| |IGLCBC funding will be used to protect the entire County, including Tribal lands. |
| |ACTION: |
|4. |A Main Motion was placed on the floor by Supervisor Jacob, Seconded by Supervisor Slater-Price, to take action as recommended by |
| |the Sheriff. (No action was taken on the motion, as a Substitute Motion was placed on the floor. See Action 4.1) |
|4.1 |ON MOTION of Supervisor Roberts, seconded by Supervisor Cox, the Board of Supervisors approved a Substitute Motion, amending |
| |recommendation number 3 to read: “Direct the Chief Administrative Officer to prepare a Budget Change Letter for consideration |
| |during FY 2004/05 budget deliberations for the purpose of establishing $1,900,000 of appropriations within the Sheriff’s |
| |Department for the purchase and outfitting of a Type II medium-lift turbine helicopter based on revenue of $1,500,000 from a |
| |grant from IGLCBC and $400,000 in the ASTREA Trust Fund, and to seek $600,000 in ongoing revenue after the Conklin & de Decker |
| |Phase II Study is completed and the recommendations of our regional commission are before the Board.” |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Roberts, Horn |
| |NOES: Jacob, Slater-Price |
| | |
| |(Supervisors Jacob and Slater-Price requested the Minutes reflect that their “No” vote was based on their support of the entire |
| |package of recommendations of the Sheirff) |
| |
| |
|5. |SUBJECT: |REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS TO ACQUIRE A FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY HELICOPTER (DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |On December 9, 2003 (7), at the request of Supervisor Roberts and Supervisor Horn, your Board directed the Chief Administrative |
| |Officer to explore the creation of a governing body that would oversee the operation of a fire and life safety helicopter. Your |
| |Board also directed the Chief Administrative Officer to explore funding options to acquire, staff and maintain a fire and life |
| |safety helicopter that would be permanently based in San Diego County. |
| |On February 10, 2004 (1), your Board established the Fire and Life Safety Helicopter Operating Council, and directed that the |
| |Council submit, through the Chief Administrative Officer, appropriate recommendations to acquire and operate a fire and life |
| |safety helicopter. The Fire and Life Safety Helicopter Operating Council’s preliminary recommendation is contained in this board |
| |letter. The proposed action will competitively procure a fire and life safety helicopter to enhance public health and well being |
| |throughout San Diego County. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |Funds for this request are budgeted. The funding source is the FY 2004-05 CAO Proposed Operational Plan. $3.5 million was |
| |budgeted for this purpose by your Board on February 10, 2004 (1). This amount will be reduced by $120,000 due to Board action on |
| |May 18, 2004 (21) to lease a helicopter effective July 1, 2004, leaving a balance of $3,380,000. If approved, this request will |
| |result in up to $3,380,000 in FY 2004-05 costs. This request will not require additional staff years. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY HELICOPTER OPERATING COUNCIL: |
| |In accordance with Section 401, Article XXIII of the County Administrative Code authorize the Director, Department of Purchasing |
| |and Contracting to issue a Competitive Solicitation to acquire and refurbish a used, twin-engine, Type II helicopter similar to |
| |and equipped the same as Copter One operated by the San Diego Regional Fire and Rescue Helicopter Program, and upon successful |
| |negotiations and determination of a fair and reasonable price, award a contract, and to amend the contract as needed to reflect |
| |changes to services and funding. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Slater-Price, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board of Supervisors continued the item to July 13, |
| |2004, on Consent. |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|6. |SUBJECT: |SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT’S ACCEPTANCE OF DONATION AND REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF OUT OF COUNTRY BUSINESS |
| | |(DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |Section 66 of the Administrative Code of the County of San Diego and Board of Supervisors Policy A-112 permits the acceptance of |
| |gifts by the administrative head of each department in the County, subject to ratification of the Board of Supervisors. The U.S.|
| |Marshals Service/Violent Crimes Task Force is donating airfare, lodging, ground transportation expenses, and tuition valued at |
| |$3,054, so that a Sheriff’s employee can attend training at the International Fugitive Conference. |
| |Per Board of Supervisors Policy D-7, this is a request for one Deputy Sheriff to travel to Toronto, Canada from June 6, 2004 |
| |through June 11, 2004 to attend the International Fugitive Conference. The incumbent is currently assigned to the Sheriff’s |
| |Felony Warrant Unit (FWU) and San Diego Violent Crimes Task Force (VCTF). |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |There is no net county cost associated with this request. The U.S. Marshals Service/Violent Crimes Task Force will be paying for|
| |all of the travel expenses. The Sheriff’s employee will be receiving his regular salary and benefits. No overtime will be |
| |generated as a result of the trip. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |SHERIFF: |
| |Accept the donation of airfare, lodging, ground transportation expenses, and tuition valued at $3,054 from the U.S. Marshals |
| |Service/Violent Crimes Task Force. |
| |Authorize the Chairperson of the Board of Supervisors to sign a letter of appreciation to the U.S. Marshals Service/Violent |
| |Crimes Task Force. |
| |Approve out-of-country travel to Toronto, Canada for a Sheriff’s employee to attend training at the International Fugitive |
| |Conference, during the following dates: June 6, 2004 through June 11, 2004. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Slater-Price, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on |
| |Consent. |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|7. |SUBJECT: |SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR THE PROCUREMENT OF HOSPITAL GUARD SERVICES (DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |This request is to approve a sole source contract with Heritage Security Services for the provision of security officers to guard|
| |low level classified inmates in the Sheriff’s custody that have been admitted to hospitals and other health care facilities in |
| |San Diego County. |
| |Low level inmates are those inmates who pose a low security risk to staff and other inmates; have no current or significant prior|
| |assault or escape history; and, have no known discipline problems. The use of contracted security services to guard low risk |
| |hospitalized inmates has proven to be a more economical alternative to using the more expensive Deputy Sheriff. Hospital guard |
| |services are currently provided at an hourly rate of $15.48 per hour whereas the Department would pay an estimated average hourly|
| |rate of $37.90 per hour to assign a Deputy Sheriff to provide this same service. |
| |The use of contracted security services is beneficial to the Department since it not only provides an estimated hourly savings of|
| |$22.42 per hour but, more importantly, it supports the continuous operations of the detentions facilities by enabling the |
| |assignment of deputies to more critical duties within the facilities. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |Funds for this request are included in the FY 2004-05 CAO Proposed Operational Plan. If approved, this request will result in an|
| |estimated cost of $500,000 and an estimated total cost of $2,500,000 over a period of five years and will not require the |
| |addition of staff years. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |SHERIFF: |
| |Waive the advertising and competitive procurement requirements of Board Policy A-87. |
| |Authorize the Director of Purchasing and Contracting to enter into negotiations with Heritage Security Services, and, subject to |
| |successful negotiations and determination of a fair and reasonable price, award a contract not to exceed $500,000 a year for a |
| |period of one year, with four one-year renewal options, for security services to guard prisoners in hospitals and other health |
| |care facilities in San Diego County. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Slater-Price, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on |
| |Consent. |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|8. |SUBJECT: |OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES – HOMELAND SECURITY GRANTS APPLICATION AND ACCEPTANCE (DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |On July 29, 2003 (2), your Board authorized the Office of Emergency Services (OES) to apply for the FY 03 State Homeland Security|
| |Grant (Part II). The County of San Diego has been awarded $6,689,008. This funding is for planning, the continued development |
| |of an exercise program, equipment purchases and grant administration. This is a request to accept these funds to be used by the |
| |County, the incorporated cities and those special districts with a role in response to a terrorist attack. This is also a |
| |request for authorization to apply for and accept the FY04 Homeland Security Grant. The San Diego Operational Area is eligible |
| |for up to $10,383,187 in grant funding. The FY04 grant incorporates the State Homeland Security Grant (SHSG), the Citizen Corps |
| |Program (CCP) Grant and the Law Enforcement Terrorism Prevention Program (LETPP) Grants. In previous years, these were |
| |individual grants requiring their own application and administration process. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |Funds for this request are included in the Fiscal Year 2004-2005 CAO Proposed Operational Plan. If approved, this will result in|
| |no current year costs and $17,072,195 in costs and revenue in Fiscal Year 2004-2005. The funding source is the State of |
| |California State Homeland Security Grant program. There will be no General Fund cost and the proposal will require no additional|
| |staff years. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER: |
| |Authorize the Office of Emergency Services to accept a grant from the Governor’s Office of Emergency Services for the FY03 State |
| |Homeland Security Grant (Part II) in the amount of $6,689,008 to purchase equipment to enhance response to chemical, biological |
| |and radiological incidents as well as conduct exercises, planning and administration. |
| |Authorize the Office of Emergency Services to submit a grant application to the Office of Homeland Security for the FY04 State |
| |Homeland Security Grant and accept the grant in the amount of $10,383,187 to purchase equipment to enhance response to chemical, |
| |biological and radiological incidents as well as conduct exercises, planning and administration. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Slater-Price, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on |
| |Consent. |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|9. |SUBJECT: |OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES - GRANT ACCEPTANCE – FEMA SUPPLEMENTAL GRANT AND THE ALCOA FOUNDATION FOR |
| | |COMMUNITY EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM DEVELOPMENT (DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |On January 28, 2003 (9), your Board authorized the Office of Emergency Services to apply for a grant offered by the Federal |
| |Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) through the Governor’s Office on Service and Volunteerism (GOSERV) to provide funding for the |
| |development of a Citizen Corps Council and for the development of a countywide Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) program. |
| |The Citizen Corps Council was formed on April 15, 2003. |
| |This year, another grant from FEMA/GOSERV will provide $73,547 for the continuing development of the countywide CERT program. In |
| |addition, an unanticipated grant for $5,500 has been received from the ALCOA Foundation for the training of citizens to assist |
| |first responders. |
| |This is a request to accept these funds to be used by the County and the Citizen Corps Council for the continuing development of |
| |a countywide CERT program. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |Funds for this request are included in Fiscal Year 2004-2005 CAO Proposed Operational Plan. If approved, this request will |
| |result in no current year cost and subsequent year costs of $79,047. The funding source is revenue of $73,547 from the State |
| |of California GOSERV CERT program and revenue of $5,500 from ALCOA Foundation. The ALCOA revenue was received in Fiscal Year |
| |2003-2004 as unanticipated revenue, but was re-budgeted in the CAO Proposed Operational Plan as Public Safety Group Fund Balance.|
| |There will be no General Fund cost and the proposal will require no additional staff years. There are no requirements for |
| |matching funds. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |
| |Authorize the Office of Emergency Services to accept the grant from the Governor’s Office on Service and Volunteerism (GOSERV) |
| |for $73,547 to continue the development of the countywide CERT program. |
| |Authorize the Office of Emergency Services to accept the $5,500 grant from ALCOA for use in the Countywide CERT program. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Slater-Price, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on |
| |Consent. |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|10. |SUBJECT: |OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES GRANT ACCEPTANCE – PRE-DISASTER MITIGATION COMPETITIVE GRANT PROGRAM |
| | |(DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |On September 23, 2003 (1), your Board authorized the submittal of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Pre-Disaster |
| |Mitigation Competitive Grant of $603,761. The San Diego County Office of Emergency Services (OES) has taken the lead in using |
| |these funds to develop a Multi-Jurisdictional/Multi-hazard Mitigation Plan and the County Business Continuity Plan. This grant is|
| |consistent with the leadership shown by this Board in working towards developing a coordinated regional disaster response plan. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |Funds for this request are included in the Fiscal Year 2004-05 CAO Proposed Operational Plan. If this request is approved, it |
| |will result in $603,761 in costs and revenue in Fiscal Year 2004-05. The funding source is FEMA Pre-Disaster Mitigation |
| |Competitive Grant. There will be a 25% ($150,940) match required of in-kind service costs to the County. No additional staff |
| |years are associated with this request. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER: |
| |In accordance with Board Policy B-29, Fees, Grants, Revenue Contracts – Department Responsibility for Cost Recovery, authorize |
| |the Director, Office of Emergency Services to accept the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) grant for $603,761 to |
| |complete the Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan and the Business Continuity Plan. |
| | |
| |In accordance with Board Policy A-87, Competitive Procurement, authorize the Director, Department of Purchasing and Contracting |
| |to amend contract No. 46092 with URS Corporation consultants to continue the development and implementation of a |
| |Multi-jurisdictional/Multi-hazard Mitigation Plan. Extend contract term through 2006, subject to the availability of funds; and |
| |to amend the contract as required to reflect changes to services and funding allocations, subject to the approval of the |
| |Director, Office of Emergency Services. Waive the advertising requirement of Board Policy A-87. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Slater-Price, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on |
| |Consent. |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|11. |SUBJECT: |PROBATION DEPARTMENT: PUTTING JUVENILE OFFENDERS BACK ON TRACK (DISTRICTS: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |The State of California’s Board of Corrections has authorized an extension of the County’s Juvenile Accountability Block Grant |
| |(JABG) for one year, from July 1, 2003 through June 30, 2004. The Board of Corrections has awarded $917,942 in funding for |
| |Fiscal Year 2003-04 and has identified the funding award of $701,588 for Fiscal Year 2004-05. Accepting these funds will |
| |continue “Putting Juvenile Offenders Back On Track” for a fifth year and sixth year, through June 30, 2005. The purpose of this |
| |project is to improve interagency communication, ensure immediate and appropriate consequences for wards violating Juvenile Court|
| |orders, and provide expanded prevention and intervention services to status offenders and at-risk youth. The main components of |
| |this project are the Juvenile Court web site and Community Response Officer Program. This board letter requests authority to |
| |accept the JABG revenue for Fiscal Year 2003-04 and Fiscal Year 2004-05. |
| |Award notification to the County for the current fiscal year was delayed due to the transfer of State responsibility for JABG |
| |from the Office of Criminal Justice Planning to the Board of Corrections. The award notification was received by the County on |
| |April 9, 2004. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |The funds for this request are budgeted. Revenue of $917,942 is included in the Probation Department’s Fiscal Year 2003-04 |
| |operational plan based on the Board of Corrections grant award for the prior fiscal year. Revenue of $701,588 is included in the|
| |Probation Department’s Fiscal Year 2004-06 CAO Proposed operational plan. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER: |
| |Waive Board Policy A-91, Mid-Year Budget Changes. |
| | |
| |Authorize the Chief Probation Officer to accept Juvenile Accountability Block Grant revenue of $917,942 for the period July 1, |
| |2003 through June 30, 2004, and $701,588 for the period July 1, 2004 through June 30, 2005, from the State of California’s Board |
| |of Corrections. |
| |Approve and authorize the Chief Probation Officer to sign and submit applications, related contracts, amendments or extensions |
| |for the Juvenile Accountability Block Grant with the State of California. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Slater-Price, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on |
| |Consent. |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|12. |SUBJECT: |AGREEMENTS WITH SELECTED RECIPIENTS OF INDIAN GAMING SPECIAL DISTRIBUTION FUND GRANTS (DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |The Indian Gaming Local Community Benefit Committee (Committee) has selected grant applications to be funded by the Indian Gaming|
| |Special Distribution Fund. The selected projects, listed below, will reduce environmental risk through increased fire |
| |protection; increase public safety; and result in increased capability to deliver emergency services. |
| |San Diego County Sheriff’s Department: $1.5 million for a medium lift fire/search & rescue helicopter to augment the Sheriff’s |
| |aviation detail; |
| |San Diego County District Attorney’s Office: $100,000 for the tribal liaison project. |
| |Intermountain Volunteer Fire and Rescue Department: $111,772.25 for the Intermountain Fire Station. |
| |Heartland Communications Authority: $70,000 for a computerized emergency dispatch system. |
| |San Diego Rural Fire Protection District: $100,000 for a collaborative dispatch system. |
| |The Committee’s recommendation to allocate $2.25 Million to the San Miguel Consolidated Fire Protection District for acquisition |
| |of six new fire trucks is being considered by the Barona, Sycuan and Viejas Bands; they will report to the Committee on June 10 |
| |whether they want to sponsor that grant application. |
| |This is a request for the Board to delegate authority to enter into agreements with grant recipients to the Chief Administrative |
| |Officer or his designee. A formal agreement between County and non-County grant recipients will ensure that each party complies |
| |with the requirements of SB 621. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |The amount the County will be receiving, in FY 03-04, for administering the grant program is $26,105, to be distributed as |
| |follows: Office of County Counsel: $9,439.50; Department of Planning and Land Use: $8,855.68; and Chief Administrative Office: |
| |$7,809.82. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER: |
| |Authorize the Chief Administrative Officer, or his designee, to enter into agreements with selected recipients of Indian Gaming |
| |Special Distribution Fund grants. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Slater-Price, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on |
| |Consent. |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |
| |
|13. |SUBJECT: |FUNDING FOR PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF EDGEMOOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITY (DISTRICT: 2) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |Edgemoor Hospital is a County-owned and operated Distinct Part/Skilled Nursing care facility in Santee that is licensed by the |
| |State of California under the San Diego County Psychiatric Hospital. Edgemoor currently provides care for approximately 175 |
| |patients. These patients have severe and long-term diagnoses such as AIDS, Huntington’s Chorea, Alzheimer’s and severe mental and|
| |behavioral issues. The current facility has buildings that range from 40 to 80 years of use, and maintaining the facility to |
| |properly care for the patients is a challenging and costly endeavor. |
| |Several years ago, at the recommendation of Supervisor Jacob, the Board initiated a process to pursue development of a new |
| |facility at Edgemoor. The Board subsequently determined to proceed with efforts to develop a new Edgemoor healthcare facility |
| |owned and operated by the County, and has taken a series of actions to move forward with this project. The Board has set aside |
| |acreage for a proposed Edgemoor facility, and has received a presentation on the conceptual design for the facility. Funding has|
| |been approved for design, construction document development, and completion of the environmental review process for construction |
| |of a new 192-bed Skilled Nursing facility. |
| |On January 15, 2002, (19), the Board authorized the Chief Financial Officer to seek long-term financing not to exceed $65 million|
| |through the issuance of Certificates of Participation (COP’s) via the Capital Financing Program sponsored by SANCAL. The Chief |
| |Financial Officer was also authorized to competitively procure underwriting services related to those certificates. Most |
| |recently, on July 23, 2002 (2), the Board approved the remaining funding to complete the construction document process. |
| |Project costs and funding sources have been reviewed carefully, and staff has reconfirmed that the project is feasible within the|
| |Board-approved long-term debt limit of $65 million. While estimated construction costs have increased by approximately $2 |
| |million due to an escalation in steel prices, the overall financing plan remains viable. |
| |Today’s item requests Board approval for a number of additional actions necessary to move forward with the construction phase of |
| |the Edgemoor Project. These actions involve: appropriating $6 million of unsecuritized Tobacco Settlement revenue for initial |
| |funding of overall construction costs, to be reimbursed from proceeds of the COP’s; adopting environmental findings; and |
| |authorizing contract-related actions by County staff. |
| |Design plans have been submitted to the State and final approvals are expected by Summer 2004. The Edgemoor project team is |
| |prepared to structure Certificates of Participation on behalf of SANCAL to finance the construction of the new Edgemoor facility |
| |once plans are approved. Appropriating Tobacco Settlement funds will allow the Edgemoor construction project to commence upon |
| |completion of the construction selection and contracting process, pending issuance of long-term debt. |
| |Staff will return for further approvals, including the necessary increase in the level of appropriations for the project, when |
| |final financing has been completed. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |Appropriations of $5,689,863 for this project are currently budgeted in the Capital Outlay Fund in the Fiscal Year 03-04 budget. |
| |If approved, this request will result in increased current year cost and revenue of $6,000,000. The funding source is |
| |unsecuritized Tobacco Settlement Trust Fund. This action will result in total appropriations of $11,689,863 in Capital Project |
| |KK0866. Total funding includes $2,050,000 from the Edgemoor Development Fund and will include $9,369,863 from the unsecuritized |
| |Tobacco Settlement Trust Fund. There will be no change in net General Fund cost and no additional staff years as a result of |
| |this action. |
| |The estimated total project cost is $66.8 million. Debt proceeds would be used to reimburse the Edgemoor Development Fund |
| |($2,050,000) and the unsecuritized Tobacco Settlement Trust Fund ($9,369,863). Debt service on Certificates of Participation is |
| |currently projected at approximately $4.1 million annually over 25 years. The debt service would be paid from federal financial |
| |participation available under SB 1128 and proceeds from the sale or lease of surplus property surrounding Edgemoor. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER: |
| |Waive Board Policy A-91, Mid-Year Budget Changes. |
| |Establish appropriations of $6,000,000 in the Capital Outlay fund Capital Project KK0866 based on revenue from the Tobacco |
| |Settlement Trust Fund (4 VOTES) |
| |Authorize the Auditor and Controller, upon receipt of the Edgemoor bond proceeds, to substitute the revenue funding from the |
| |Tobacco Settlement Trust with bond proceeds. |
| | |
| |Adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration dated October 30, 2003 on file with the Department of General Services; find it reflects|
| |the independent judgment and analysis of the Board of Supervisors and that such Board has reviewed and considered the information|
| |contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration and comments received during public review; find that the revisions on the |
| |project plans would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur; and, |
| |find on the basis of the whole record before the Board of Supervisors (including this Mitigated Negative Declaration) that there |
| |is no substantial evidence that the project as revised will have a significant effect on the environment. |
| |Adopt the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program prepared in accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21086.6. Instruct|
| |the Director of the Department of General Services to ensure compliance with the Mitigation Monitoring Program. |
| |Authorize the Director, Department of Purchasing and Contracting, to take any action authorized by section 401 et seq. of the |
| |Administrative Code, with respect to contracting for the subject public works project KK0866, New Skilled Nursing Facility, |
| |Santee. |
| |Designate the Director of General Services as the County Officer responsible for the administration of contracts related to this |
| |action. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Cox, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended. |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|14. |SUBJECT: |PROCUREMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH LABORATORY SUPPLIES (DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |The County’s Public Health Laboratory currently uses proprietary equipment from a number of companies to perform automated |
| |laboratory testing for multiple diseases including tuberculosis, hepatitis and HIV diseases. Proprietary equipment used in the |
| |lab requires the use of specific supplies to ensure accurate and valid test results. |
| |Board authorization is requested to approve new blanket purchase agreements with current providers of compatible supplies: Abbott|
| |Laboratories, Trinity BioTech, Becton Dickinson, BioMerieux, GenProbe, Orasure Technologies, and Sanochemia for compatible |
| |laboratory testing supplies for the period of July 1, 2004 through June 30, 2005 with four additional option years. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |Funds for this proposal are included in the FY 2004-2006 Operational Plan. If approved, this request will result in FY 2004-2005 |
| |and subsequent year costs of $285,200. The funding source is Health Realignment revenues. There will be no change in net General|
| |Fund costs and no additional staff years. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER: |
| |In accordance with Board Policies A-87, approve and authorize the Director, Department of Purchasing and Contracting to enter |
| |into negotiations with Abbott Laboratories, Trinity BioTech, Becton Dickinson, BioMerieux, GenProbe, Orasure Technologies, and |
| |Sanochemia; and, subject to successful negotiations and determination of fair and reasonable price, award purchase agreements for|
| |laboratory supplies and test kits, for the period of July 1, 2004 through June 30, 2005 with four additional option years through|
| |June 30, 2009, and up to an additional six months if necessary pending the availability of funds, and to amend the agreements as |
| |required for changes that do not materially impact or alter the program or funding level, subject to approval of the Director, |
| |Health and Human Services Agency. Waive the advertising requirement of A-87. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Slater-Price, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on |
| |Consent. |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|15. |SUBJECT: |DONATIONS TO THE HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY FOR THE A.B. AND JESSIE POLINSKY CHILDREN'S CENTER |
| | |(DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |County Administrative Code Section 66 (Acceptance of Gifts) and Board Policy A-112 (Acceptance of Gifts and Donations) require |
| |Board approval for the acceptance of gifts and donations over $5,000. The Health and Human Services Agency periodically receives|
| |cash gifts and in-kind donations worth $5,000 or more to benefit resident children at the A.B. and Jessie Polinsky Children’s |
| |Center, the County-operated emergency shelter care facility for abused, neglected, and abandoned children. The Board last |
| |accepted seven donations valued at $107,758 on May 6, 2003 (4). Board action is requested today to accept cash and in-kind |
| |donations, totaling $263,512, for the benefit of children at the A.B. and Jessie Polinsky Children’s Center. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |There is no fiscal impact as a result of this Board action. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER: |
| |Accept gifts and donations totaling $263,512 to the A.B. and Jessie Polinsky Children’s Center from: Charlene Hoekstra; the Child|
| |Abuse Prevention Foundation; Pure-Flo Water Company; Factory 2-U and employees; Michael Manning; the Make-a-Wish Foundation; |
| |I.P.C. Corporation; Wal-Mart El Cajon; Dan DeMarco; Richard Nucci; Parfums De Coeur; Chase Manhattan Mortgage; Olivenhain Pioneer|
| |Elementary School; the Willis Allen Company and San Diego Home/Garden Lifestyle Magazine; the Marx Foundation; Rancho Bernardo |
| |Community Presbyterian Church; Morgan Run Resort and Club; and the Susan Scott Foundation. |
| |Authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to send letters of appreciation to the donors. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Slater-Price, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on |
| |Consent. |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|16. |SUBJECT: |IN-HOME SUPPORTIVE SERVICES PUBLIC AUTHORITY INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT (DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |An Interagency Agreement between the In-Home Supportive Services Public Authority and the County specifies responsibilities and |
| |obligations on the part of both entities, including the Public Authority’s purchase of certain services from the County. Under |
| |the agreement, the Health and Human Services Agency provides fiscal and contract monitoring for the Public Authority, the |
| |Department of Human Resources provides assistance with labor negotiations, County Counsel is available for legal assistance, and |
| |fiscal services are provided by the Auditor and Controller. Other County departments that provide necessary services include the|
| |Clerk of the Board, General Services, the Treasurer, and Purchasing and Contracting. |
| |The current Interagency Agreement, approved by the Board in December 2002, will expire June 30, 2004. An updated agreement has |
| |been prepared that reflects prior Board direction for the Public Authority to perform Department of Justice background clearances|
| |for providers wishing to be listed on the Authority’s Registry. The new agreement also includes several changes that are minor |
| |and non-material. |
| |Board action is requested to approve the Interagency Agreement for the period July 1, 2004 through June 30, 2006, and to |
| |authorize future renewals as well as any changes that are not substantive. A companion item on today’s Public Authority |
| |Governing Body agenda requests Governing Body approval of the agreement. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |These funds are included in the Fiscal Year 2004-05 Operational Plan. If approved, this request will result in costs and |
| |revenues of $67,600. The funding source is the In-Home Supportive Services Public Authority. There will be no change in net |
| |General Fund costs and no additional staff years. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER: |
| |Authorize and direct the Clerk of the Board to execute the Interagency Agreement between the County of San Diego In-Home |
| |Supportive Services Public Authority and the County of San Diego for the period July 1, 2004 through June 30, 2006; and authorize|
| |the Clerk of the Board to execute non-material amendments to the Agreement in the future, to include renewing the Agreement |
| |bi-annually upon the mutual written agreement of the parties, subject to the approval of the Director, Health and Human Services |
| |Agency. |
| |(Relates to In-Home Supportive Services Agenda No. 1) |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Slater-Price, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on |
| |Consent. |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|17. |SUBJECT: |LEASE AGREEMENT FOR HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY NORTH CENTRAL MENTAL HEALTH CLINIC AND CASE |
| | |MANAGEMENT, 1250 MORENA BOULEVARD, SAN DIEGO (DISTRICT: 4) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |The Health and Human Services Agency (HHSA) has operated its North Central Mental Health Clinic and Case Management in a leased |
| |facility at 1250 Morena Boulevard, San Diego, since October 1988. Today's request is for Board approval of a new three-year |
| |lease at this location. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |Funds for this request are budgeted in the Fiscal Year 2003-04 Operational Plan and included in the CAO Proposed Operational Plan|
| |for Fiscal Year 2004-05 and Fiscal Year 2005-06. If approved, this request will result in a current year cost of $244,930, and a|
| |subsequent year cost of $266,340. The funding source is Health and Human Services Agency, Mental Health Realignment for all |
| |fiscal years. There is no General Fund cost and the proposal will require no additional staff years. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER: |
| |1. Find, in accordance with Section 15301 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, that the proposed lease |
| |is categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA, as it involves the continuation of an existing use. |
| |2. Approve and authorize the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors to execute three copies of the lease agreement. |
| |3. Authorize the Director of the Department of General Services to exercise the option to extend the lease prior to its |
| |expiration, if appropriate. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Slater-Price, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on |
| |Consent. |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|18. |SUBJECT: |SET HEARING FOR 7/13/04 |
| | |INTENTION TO ENTER INTO AN OPTION TO PURCHASE AND SALE OF SURPLUS REAL PROPERTY – COUNTY PARCEL |
| | |2003-0300-A - BUSINESS PARK DRIVE, VISTA (DISTRICT 5) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |This is a request for the Board to take the necessary actions required to enter into an Option to Purchase and Sale of 16.06 |
| |acres of industrial land located at Business Park Drive and Sycamore Avenue in the City of Vista (Thomas Guide, page1107 J6). The|
| |two surplus parcels, Lots UU and VV of the Vista Business Park, were acquired in 1991 for a trash transfer site and are no longer|
| |required for that purpose. This property is considered to be excess to County needs. |
| |Under the proposed process, the County would seek bids from prospective developers and users for a one-year option to develop the|
| |property for industrial use. It is anticipated that the successful bidder will develop this property in accordance with plans to |
| |be submitted to and approved by the City of Vista. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |If an Option to Purchase is approved, additional current year revenue is estimated to be a minimum of $150,000, with no annual |
| |revenue. If the selected high bidder elects to exercise the option and executes the Option to Purchase with the County, future |
| |one-time revenue is estimated to be a minimum of $8,750,000. No additional staff years will be required as a result of this |
| |action. |
| |Expenses and staff costs incurred by the Real Estate Services Division of the Department of General Services to process and |
| |manage this General Fund sale will be offset by a real estate management fee in an amount not to exceed $150,000. Such fee shall |
| |be transferred to the Facilities Management ISF – Real Estate Services Division from the Option Payment, after the 90-day Option |
| |Refund period has expired. All remaining proceeds of this sale will be deposited into the General Fund. |
| |BUSINESS IMPACT STATEMENT: |
| |The successful bidder could potentially construct approximately 250,000 square feet of improvements on this combined County |
| |property with a projected total cost of approximately $15 million dollars. The completed project is anticipated to employ 150 to |
| |200 people full-time and an additional 100 to 125 construction workers will be employed during the six to eight-month |
| |construction period. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |
| |Find that the Option to Purchase and Sale process is not subject to the environmental assessment process as a sale of surplus |
| |property is categorically exempt under Article 19, Section 15312 of the State of California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines.|
| |Declare this County property, County Parcel 2003-0300-A, surplus to County needs. |
| |Direct the Clerk of the Board to advertise the Notice of Intention to Enter into an Option to Purchase and Sale in accordance |
| |with Government Code Section 6063. |
| |Approve and adopt the attached Resolution of Intention to Enter into an Option to Purchase and Sale of Real Property and Notice |
| |Inviting Bids. (4 VOTES) |
| |On July 13, 2004, conduct the bid opening and approve the granting of an Option to Purchase of County Parcel 2003-0300-A to the |
| |highest bidder. |
| |Authorize the Director, Department of General Services, to perform all necessary actions to complete the sale of this property |
| |including the execution of the Option to Purchase Agreement, escrow instructions, and a Grant Deed. |
| |Authorize the Chief Financial Officer, Auditor and Controller, to deposit all General Fund proceeds of this Option to Purchase |
| |and Sale, less expenses to be credited to the Facilities Management ISF – Real Estate Services Division, into the General Fund. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Slater-Price, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on |
| |Consent; setting hearing for July 13, 2004 at 9:00 a.m. and adopting Resolution No. 04-101 entitled: RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO |
| |ENTER INTO AN OPTION TO PURCHASE AND SALE OF REAL PROPERTY AND NOTICE INVITING BIDS. |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |
| |
|19. |SUBJECT: |LOCAL COMMUNITY PROJECTS (DISTRICT: 1) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |The County of San Diego is fortunate to have an opportunity to reinvest taxpayer money into our communities for the benefit of |
| |the public. This action today will assist several community-based organizations in meeting the needs of individuals and families.|
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |The fiscal impact of the proposed recommendations is $14,130. This action will result in the addition of no staff years and no |
| |future costs. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |SUPERVISOR COX: |
| |Allocate $5,500 from the Community Projects budget (0261) to Casa Familiar for the purchase of technology equipment for |
| |translation and community presentations. |
| |Allocate $1,000 from the Community Projects budget (0261) to The Effect for costs associated with the Annual Community Juneteenth|
| |Extravaganza. |
| |Allocate $2,500 from the Community Projects budget (0261) to the Friends of the Arts for production, printing, and distribution |
| |of the Mozaic arts calendar and newsletter. |
| |Allocate $1,500 from the Community Projects budget (0261) to the Ocean Beach Antique Association for costs associated with the |
| |Antiques on the Avenue Street Fair. |
| |Find that the allocation to the Health and Human Services Agency is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) |
| |pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15301. |
| |Transfer $3,630 from the Community Projects budget (0261) to the Health and Human Services Agency San Pasqual Academy Project Org|
| |46205, Account 2340 for HVAC repairs including replacement of a compressor and minor expenses associated with maintenance of the |
| |campus. |
| |Authorize the Chief Financial Officer to execute a grant agreement with the organizations listed in Recommendations 1 through 4, |
| |establishing terms for receipt of the funds described above. |
| |Find that all grant awards described above have a public purpose. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Slater-Price, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on |
| |Consent. |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|20. |SUBJECT: |ALLOCATION OF COMMUNITY PROJECTS FUNDS (DISTRICT: 4) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |This recommended action proposes that several projects of great benefit to San Diego County be funded using Community Projects |
| |Funds. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |The total combined cost of the proposed recommendation is $323,880. Appropriations are available in the Community Projects |
| |Budget unit (0264). This action will result in the addition of no staff years and no future costs. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |SUPERVISOR ROBERTS: |
| |Find that the allocations to the Boys & Girls Club of Greater San Diego, the George Barnes Family Junior Tennis Center and the |
| |Pro Kids Golf Academy are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15301. |
| |Allocate $40,000 from the Community Projects Budget unit (0264) to the Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater San Diego to refurbish the |
| |Learning Center at the Clairemont Boys & Girls Club. |
| |Allocate $25,000 from the Community Projects Budget unit (0264) to the World Foundation for Smart Communities to produce an |
| |outreach program for Envision San Diego. |
| |Allocate $25,000 from the Community Projects Budget unit (0264) to the George Barnes Family Junior Tennis Center for computer |
| |upgrades to the Learning Center and for court lighting replacement and repairs. |
| |Allocate $50,000 from the Community Projects Budget unit (0264) to the San Diego Hall of Champions for program needs. |
| |Allocate $50,000 from the Community Projects Budget unit (0264) to Pro Kids Golf Academy to complete renovations to the golf |
| |course. |
| |Allocate $10,000 from the Community Projects Budget unit (0264) to the Center for Community Solutions for the Youth-to-Youth |
| |Helpline. |
| |Allocate $50,000 from the Community Projects Budget unit (0264) to the Vietnam Veterans of San Diego for furniture and equipment |
| |for the Veterans’ Village of San Diego. |
| |Allocate $25,000 from the Community Projects Budget unit (0264) to the Senior Community Centers for two new refrigerators and a |
| |sandwich sealer. |
| |Allocate $18,880 from the Community Projects Budget unit (0264) to the Taiwanese American Foundation of San Diego for office |
| |equipment and information technology equipment. |
| |Allocate $20,000 from the Community Projects Budget unit (0264) to the Epilepsy Foundation of San Diego County for program needs.|
| | |
| |Allocate $10,000 from the Community Projects Budget unit (0264) to the Friends of San Pasqual Academy for program needs. |
| |Authorize the Chief Financial Officer to execute grant agreements with the organizations listed above establishing the terms for |
| |receipt of the funds described above. |
| |Find that all the grant awards described above have a public purpose. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Slater-Price, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on |
| |Consent. |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |
| |
|21. |SUBJECT: |NOTICED PUBLIC HEARING: |
| | |ISSUANCE OF TAX-EXEMPT BONDS BY THE ASSOCIATION OF BAY AREA GOVERNMENTS FINANCE AUTHORITY FOR ZOOLOGICAL|
| | |SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO (DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |The Zoological Society of San Diego has applied to ABAG Finance Authority for Non-profit Corporations to issue revenue bonds, in |
| |an amount not to exceed $45,000,000 (the “Bonds”). The proceeds of the Bonds will be used to finance and/or refinance the |
| |acquisition, construction, improvement, furnishing and equipping of an internal visitor transportation system, a monorail |
| |replacement program and other related appurtenant facilities to the Wild Animal Park located in the San Pasqual Valley. The |
| |County of San Diego is a member of this finance authority, which assists non-profit corporations through the issuance of |
| |tax-exempt debt. The only role of the County of San Diego in this project is to approve the financing solely for purposes of |
| |satisfying the public approval requirement of Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) of 1986. Similar |
| |approvals have been given to other conduits to be financed by ABAG. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |If approved, this proposal will result in $1,000 of revenue to be used to fund the County’s Investor Relations Programs as |
| |approved by the Board of Supervisors in the County’s Debt Management Policy (B-65). No additional staff years will be required. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER AND DEBT ADVISORY COMMITTEE: |
| |Adopt the resolution approving the tax-exempt financing and the issuance of the Bonds by the ABAG for the Zoological Society |
| |solely for purposes of satisfying the requirements of the Code. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Slater-Price, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board of Supervisors closed the hearing and took action|
| |as recommended, on Consent; adopting Resolution No. 04-102 entitled: RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN|
| |DIEGO APPROVING THE ISSUANCE BY THE ABAG FINANCE AUTHORITY FOR NONPROFIT CORPORATIONS OF NOT TO EXCEED $45,000,000 AGGREGATE |
| |PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF REVENUE BONDS TO FINANCE IMPROVEMENTS TO THE SAN DIEGO WILD ANIMAL PARK AND AUTHORIZING OTHER MATTERS |
| |RELATING THERETO. |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|22. |SUBJECT: |APPROVAL OF THE FINANCING DOCUMENTS FOR THE 2004 PENSION OBLIGATION BONDS (DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |The County of San Diego (the “County”) takes very seriously its commitment to ensuring that the County Retirement Fund (the |
| |“Fund”) is appropriately funded. The County has both short and long term plans for dealing with the changing conditions which |
| |affect the Fund such as market losses, negotiated benefit increases, and changes in the dynamics which affect the experience of |
| |the Fund. The County has historically paid the full annual contribution as determined by the Retirement Board of the San Diego |
| |County Employees’ Retirement Association (SDCERA) based upon the opinion of SDCERA’s actuary. The County has also periodically |
| |taken advantage of low interest rates, through the issuance of Pension Obligation Bonds (POBs), to infuse the fund with |
| |substantial cash to lower the Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability (UAAL). |
| |In 1993, the Board of Supervisors approved the issuance of $430 million in Taxable Pension Obligation Bonds, 1994 Series A (the |
| |“1994 Bonds”). Successful investment management of those funds by SDCERA and a rising stock market allowed the Fund to remain |
| |fully funded for several years. In 2001, the County negotiated an increase in the retirement benefits to employees. The benefit|
| |adjustments were part of a settlement of litigation that was of substantial risk and were a part of an overall contract agreement|
| |with employee representatives that ensured the County would remain competitive with other local governments in the region. |
| |Per the County’s plan to manage the increased cost of benefits, the County issued $737 million of Taxable Pension Obligation |
| |Bonds in October 2002 (the “2002 Bonds”). A portion of the proceeds was used to pay down substantially the 1994 Bonds and the |
| |remainder was applied against the UAAL. To date, SDCERA’s prudent management in the past year has generated earnings of |
| |approximately $125,000,000 on those 2002 Bond proceeds. |
| |SDCERA’s most recent actuarial valuation as of June 30, 2003, calculates the UAAL to be $1.435 billion. This takes into account |
| |a variety of factors including changes in actuarial assumptions adopted by SDCERA in March 2004, as well as the impact of $1.4 |
| |billion in market losses during the three years ending June 2003. It does not take into account the very sizable gains in the |
| |fund that have occurred since that date. |
| |Your Board’s prudent strategy for managing the UAAL incorporates the reliance upon market earnings and, if necessary, the |
| |periodic issuance of POBs during times when a favorable interest rate market exists, such as it exists today. Therefore, the |
| |issuance of additional POBs is recommended in order to take advantage of current interest rate savings. |
| |Per your Board’s action taken on April 6, 2004, the Chief Financial Officer has assembled a financing team consisting of the |
| |underwriters, financial advisor, and bond counsel. Presented for your Board’s approval today are the financing documents for |
| |the issuance of the 2004 Taxable Pension Obligation Bonds (the “2004 Bonds”). The proceeds of the 2004 Bond is estimated not to |
| |exceed $460 million, and will be used primarily to reduce the UAAL. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |With the issuance of the 2004 Bonds and the economic defeasance of the 1994 Bonds, the combined debt service payment due on all |
| |County long-term obligations will be approximately equal to the current total debt service of approximately $120 million. The |
| |issuance of these Bonds will result in approximately $100 million of overall retirement cost savings. The anticipated defeasance|
| |of the 1994 Bonds will be paid with one-time resources of approximately $62 million. The appropriations necessary for the debt |
| |service are included in the Fiscal Years 2004-2006 Proposed Operational Plan. No further staff will be required. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER AND DEBT ADVISORY COMMITTEE: |
| |Adopt the resolution approving the delivery of a Debenture, Second Supplemental Trust Agreement, Contract of Purchase, an |
| |Interest Rate Swap Agreement, Cap Agreement, Forward Delivery Agreement, Preliminary Official Statement, Continuing Disclosure |
| |Agreement and an Escrow Agreement for the 2004 Bonds. |
| |Authorize the Treasurer-Tax Collector, in consultation with the Chief Financial Officer, County Counsel and Bond Counsel, to |
| |negotiate a new or modify the existing term for the Debt Service Forward Sale Agreement as specified in the resolution. |
| |Amend Board Policy B-65 Long-Term Financial Obligation Management Policy, to allow variable rate exposure to not exceed 15% of |
| |the County’s outstanding long-term obligations. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Cox, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on Consent; |
| |adopting Resolution No. 04-103 entitled: RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY FOR THE ISSUANCE OF AN |
| |ADDITIONAL SAN DIEGO COUNTY PENSION OBLIGATION DEBENTURE, THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF ONE OR MORE ADDITIONAL SERIES OF SAN DIEGO |
| |COUNTY PENSION OBLIGATION BONDS, AUTHORIZING A SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL TRUST AGREEMENT, A CONTRACT OF PURCHASE, A PRELIMINARY |
| |OFFICIAL STATEMENT AND AN OFFICIAL STATEMENT, AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO. |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|23. |SUBJECT: |RETIREMENT BOARD ELECTION – THIRD (GENERAL) MEMBERS (DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |This is a request to declare the results of the Election for the Third (General) Member of the Board of Retirement, held June 1, |
| |2004, in accordance with election procedures established by your Board to satisfy requirements of the California Government Code.|
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |None |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER SAN DIEGO COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION: |
| |Declare the Candidate receiving a plurality of votes, Garry Sobeck, elected as Third (General) Member of the Board of Retirement,|
| |for a three-year term, commencing July 1, 2004 and expiring on June 30, 2007. |
| |2. Direct the Clerk of the Board to file the nominating petitions filed by the four candidates. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Slater-Price, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on |
| |Consent. |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |
| |
|24. |SUBJECT: |AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPENSATION ORDINANCE (DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |The proposed amendments to the San Diego County Compensation Ordinance are part of the ongoing effort to manage and maintain a |
| |skilled and competitive workforce dedicated to sustaining operational excellence and serving the public. These amendments |
| |include: establishing and renaming several classifications to reflect organizational changes, deleting obsolete classifications, |
| |adjusting salaries in selected classifications to reflect the job market, amending the variable entry indicator for selected |
| |classifications, and amending sections of the Compensation Ordinance, including sections authorizing terminal payoff when |
| |employees are separated from service due to layoff. As a result of regulatory changes, sections of the Ordinance regarding the |
| |Family Medical Leave Act are updated. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |Funds for these recommendations are included in the 2004-2005 proposed budget. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER: |
| |Approve introduction (first reading) of ordinances; read title and waive further reading of ordinances (MAJORITY VOTE): |
| | |
| |AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COMPENSATION ORDINANCE AND ESTABLISHING AUTHORIZED CLASSIFICATIONS, CHARACTERISTICS, AND COMPENSATION. |
| | |
| |Submit ordinances for further Board consideration and adoption (second reading) on June 22, 2004. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Slater-Price, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on |
| |Consent; submitting Ordinance for further consideration on June 22, 2004. |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|25. |SUBJECT: |SUNSET REVIEW OF BOARD POLICIES ASSIGNED TO THE FINANCE AND GENERAL GOVERNMENT GROUP (DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |In accordance with Board of Supervisors Policy A-76, the Finance and General Government Group is reviewing board policies and |
| |administrative code sections assigned to the Group. The following recommendations pertain to those policies that should be |
| |continued without changes other than to update the sunset review date. Due to the large number of board policies contained |
| |within the Finance and General Government Group, a subsequent board letter will be submitted containing those board policies with|
| |changes. Those appointing authorities responsible for the administration of the policies and codes contained herein have |
| |reviewed and concur with this board letter’s recommendations. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |There is no fiscal impact associated with these recommended actions. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER: |
| |Determine that no changes are necessary and update the sunset review dates to December 31, 2011 for the following Administrative |
| |Code sections: |
| |I General Provisions |
| |II Definitions |
| |IIIc Past Grand Jurors Association Implementation Review Committee |
| |VI Boundary Changes |
| |IX Office of County Counsel |
| |X-A Clerk of the Board of Supervisors |
| |XII County Clerk |
| |XXVIa Out–of-County/In-County Business |
| |XXVIe Reimbursements and Allowances |
| |XXXIII Hearing Officer |
| | |
| |Determine that no changes are necessary and update the sunset review dates to December 31, 2008 for the following Board of |
| |Supervisors Policies: |
| |AA-1 Board of Supervisors’ Policy Manual Modifications-Exceptions |
| |A-005 Appointment of Committee Members to Various State Committees |
| |A-013 General Regulatory Regulation |
| |A-076 Sunset Review |
| |A-079 Interlocking Directorates |
| |A-080 Publication of Ordinance Summaries and Display Advertisements |
| |A-098 Non-Interference in Administrative Affairs |
| |A-108 Service of Papers in Lawsuits on Members of Board of Supervisors |
| |A-120 Zero Tolerance for Fraudulent Conduct in County Services |
| |A-125 Americans with Disabilities Act: Employment Provisions |
| |B-004 Administration and Management of Public Liability Claims |
| |B-031 Risk Management |
| |B-036 Acts Required or Authorized to be Performed Under Revenue and Taxation Code Section 4675 by the Treasurer-Tax Collector |
| |B-038 Tuition Refund Program |
| |B-040 Administration of Workers’ Compensation Liabilities |
| |B-041 Accident and Liability Coverage for Volunteers |
| |B-042 Authorization of Power by the Board of Supervisors to the County Auditor and Controller, County Treasurer-Tax Collector, |
| |and the County Counsel Pursuant to Section 4804 of the Revenue and Taxation Code |
| |B-048 Voluntary Medical and Property Damage Coverage for Non-County-Owned Polling Places |
| |B-055 Underwriting Costs of County Publications and Activities |
| |B-057 Authorization for the County Treasurer-Tax Collector to Act for the Board of Supervisors to Implement Revenue and Taxation |
| |Code Section 3731 to Provide for Rescission of Tax Sales of Tax-Defaulted Property |
| |B-060 Use of Cable Television Franchise Fees |
| |C-002 Grievance Procedure for Unrepresented Classified Employees |
| |C-004 Employee Training |
| |C-018 Off Duty Recreational, Social and Athletic Activity of Officers and Employees |
| |C-019 Ownership of Creative Works Prepared by County Employees |
| |Determine that no changes are necessary and update the sunset review dates to December 31, 2009 for the following Board of |
| |Supervisors Policies: |
| |F-001 Screening of Tax-Deeded Land for Possible Public Use |
| |I-001a Defense of Members of Planning Groups and Sponsor Groups |
| |I-119 Subdivision of Land-Substitution of One Form of Improvement Security for Another - Reduction of Security |
| |K-006 Loan of County Property to Non-County Activities |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Slater-Price, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on |
| |Consent. |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|26. |SUBJECT: |NOTICED PUBLIC HEARING: |
| | |CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE: HIGH TECH MIDDLE (DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |The Board of Supervisors serves as the Code Reviewing Body for any Local Government Agency, other than cities, with jurisdiction |
| |wholly within the County, per Government Code Section 82011. The recommended action would approve the adopted Conflict of |
| |Interest Code submitted by High Tech Middle. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |None. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER: |
| |Approve the adopted Conflict of Interest Codes submitted by High Tech Middle. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Slater-Price, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board of Supervisors closed the hearing and took action|
| |as recommended, on Consent. |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|27. |SUBJECT: |COMMUNICATIONS RECEIVED (DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |Board Policy A-72, Board of Supervisors Agenda and Related Process, authorizes the Clerk of the Board to prepare a Communications|
| |Received for Board of Supervisors' Official Records. Routine informational reports, which need to be brought to the attention of|
| |the Board of Supervisors yet not requiring action, are listed on this document. Communications Received documents are on file in|
| |the Office of the Clerk of the Board. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |Not Applicable. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER: |
| |Note and file. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Slater-Price, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on |
| |Consent. |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|28. |SUBJECT: |ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM: |
| | |APPOINTMENTS (DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |These appointments are in accordance with applicable Board Policy A–74, Citizen Participation in County Boards, Commissions and |
| |Committees and Policy I-1, Planning and Sponsor Group Policies and Procedures. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |N/A |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHAIRWOMAN JACOB: |
| |Appoint Kippy Thomas to fill the vacancy created by the resignation of Kemp Christian, on Seat No. 5 of the Alpine Design Review |
| |Board, for term to expire June 17, 2008. |
| |Appoint Garrison Klueck to the San Diego County Law Library Board of Trustees, for a term to expire December 31, 2006. |
| |SUPERVISOR HORN: |
| |Appoint Eileen Delaney to Seat No. 1 of the I-15 Corridor Design Review Board, for a term to expire June 20, 2006. |
| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER: |
| |Confirm the appointment of Ernestine Bass to fill the vacancy created by the resignation of Bernadine Ryan Hoff on the Past Grand|
| |Jurors Association, for a term to expire December 31, 2005. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Slater-Price, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on |
| |Consent. |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|29. |SUBJECT: |CLOSED SESSION (DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |A. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS |
| |(Government Code section 54957.6) |
| |Designated Representatives: Carlos Arauz and Mike Kolb |
| |Employee Organizations: All |
| |ACTION: |
| |Any reportable matters will be announced on Wednesday, June 16, 2004, prior to the Board of Supervisors Planning and Land Use |
| |meeting. |
| |
| |
|30. |SUBJECT: |RESOLUTION EXTENDING TIME FOR BUDGET HEARINGS (DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |Government Code section 28091 provides that the Board of Supervisors may adopt a resolution extending the time for budget |
| |hearings from 10 calendar days to a maximum of 14 calendar days. Since budget hearings commence June 7, 2004, they would |
| |normally conclude on June 16, 2004. The attached resolution extends the final date for hearings to and including Friday, June |
| |18, 2004. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |N/A |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER: |
| |Adopt the attached resolution entitled: |
| | |
| |A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO EXTENDING THE TIME FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS ON THE COUNTY BUDGET |
| |FROM JUNE 16, 2004, UNTIL JUNE 18, 2004. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Slater-Price, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on |
| |Consent; adopting Resolution No. 04-104 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO EXTENDING |
| |THE TIME FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS ON THE COUNTY BUDGET FROM JUNE 16, 2004, UNTIL JUNE 18, 2004. |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|31. |SUBJECT: |PRESENTATIONS/AWARDS (DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |Vice Chairwoman Pam Slater-Price presented a proclamation to Alexandra “Lexi” Gilbert, Volunteer of the Month, declaring the June|
| |15, 2004 Lexi Gilbert day throughout the County of San Diego. |
| |Supervisor Ron Roberts presented a proclamation to Rick Clabby for Prosecutor of the Year and Outstanding Achievement Awards to |
| |Deputy District Attorneys Lou Boyle, Patrick Espinoza, Michael Runyon, and Valerie Summers. |
There being no further business, the Board adjourned at 12:12 p.m. in memory of Russell Cassel, Jean McKinney, Howard Gladstone, Howard “Buzz” Prettyman, Marjorie Baker Huff, Craig Castaneda, and Carol Jean Chubb.
THOMAS J. PASTUSZKA
Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
County of San Diego, State of California
Consent: Tosh
Discussion: Randolph
NOTE: This Statement of Proceedings sets forth all actions taken by the County of San Diego Board of Supervisors on the matters stated, but not necessarily the chronological sequence in which the matters were taken up.
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
- clinical informatics modeling terms tools and their iehr use
- mountain home va healthcare system
- organization city of burlington vermont
- the broken promise
- 1 总论 all documents the world bank
- mega lead clmsagnt confirmed sealed doc s stipdsm
- county of san diego board of supervisors
- a brief history of the united states weebly
Related searches
- san diego gs pay scale
- uchs san diego bell schedule
- san diego writer s conference 2020
- university high school san diego ca
- city of new haven board of education
- san diego city high school
- san diego high schools
- san diego county high schools
- san diego writers conference
- preliminary change of ownership san diego ca
- san diego county retirement association
- 2019 san diego county fair