UPX Material - University of Phoenix
University of Phoenix Material
Leadership Theory Matrix Key
Complete the Leadership Theory Matrix by providing a detailed description and an example or examples. See the Example provided in the first row.
Note. Answers shown in red are provided for example purposes only.
|Theory Focus |Theory Description |Example(s) |
|Heroic or charismatic leaders. “Great man” |The capacity for leadership is inherent. These |Based on the study of people who were great|
|theories. |theories held the underlying concept that great |leaders in history “focused on identifying |
| |leaders are born, not made (Northouse, 2014) |innate qualities and characteristics |
| | |possessed by great social, political, and |
| | |military leaders (Northouse, p 19) and |
| | |making assumptions about all based on a |
| | |few. |
|Personality characteristics otherwise known as|Assumes that people inherit certain qualities |Stogdill (1974) identified specific traits |
|“trait theories” |and traits that make them better suited to |and skills deemed to be critical to |
| |leadership. Trait theories often identify |leaders. |
| |particular personality or behavioral | |
| |characteristics shared by leaders | |
|Focus on skills and abilities that can be |Focus on the actions not qualities of leaders or|Katz (as quoted in Northhouse, 2013) |
|learned and developed “skills” approach |internal states. Individuals learn to become |suggested that effective administration |
| |leaders through teaching and observation is |(i.e., leadership) depends on three basic |
| |paramount to these theories. |personal |
| | |skills: technical, human, and conceptual. |
|Emphasis is on the behavior of the leader, |Emphasizes the behavior of the leader, Focuses |Ohio State Studies |
|known as “style” approach |exclusively on what leaders do and how they act |University of Michigan Studies |
| |(Nothhouse, 2013) |Blake & Mouton’s Leadership Grid |
|Leader–match theories look at how well the |Tannenbaum and Schmidt (1958) identified three |Fiedler's Least Preferred Co-worker (LPC) |
|leader’s style fits the context known as |forces that led to the leader's action: the |Theory is an example of a contingency |
|“Contingency” theory |situation, the follower and the leader. Leaders |theory Situational” leadership theories is |
| |choose the best course of action based upon |also a contincency theory. |
| |known or unknown situational variables | |
| |contincency theories focus on particular | |
| |variables related to the environment that might | |
| |determine which particular style of leadership | |
| |is best suited for the situation. | |
References
Northouse, P.G (2013). Leadership Theory & Practice (6th Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related searches
- university of phoenix portal
- university of phoenix online sign in
- university of phoenix ecampus website
- university of phoenix ecampus portal
- university of phoenix majors list
- university of phoenix bachelor programs
- university of phoenix bachelors cost
- university of phoenix student portal
- university of phoenix ecampus log in
- university of phoenix site down
- university of phoenix biology degree
- university of phoenix employee portal