Analysis of Maryland School Districts’ Teacher Ratings

Analysis of Maryland School Districts' Teacher Ratings

Presented to The Maryland State Board of Education February 24, 2015 Research Team Dan Bugler Jenna Terrell

1

Mid-Atlantic Comprehensive Center at WestEd

1 of 15 Federally-funded Centers supporting

? Standards and assessments ? Educator and leader effectiveness ? School turnaround ? Early childhood education ? College and career readiness and success ? Effective use of data to improve education

2

Allegany Anne Arundel Baltimore City Baltimore County

Calvert Caroline

Carroll Cecil

Charles Dorchester

Garrett Harford Howard

Kent Prince George's

Queen Anne's Saint Mary's Somerset Talbot Washington Wicomico Worcester State Total

Most Teachers in Maryland are rated Effective or Highly Effective

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

Ineffective Effective Highly Effective

3

Statewide Average Effective Points

Earned for Professional Practice,

Student Growth and Overall By Level of

School

90.0

80.0

70.0

79.9 79.8 78.1

60.0

50.0

40.0 30.0 37.6 37.3 37.4

37.6 38.7 38.0

20.0

10.0

0.0

Total Professional Total Student Growth Total Effectiveness

Practice

Points without MSA

Elementary Middle High

4

Calvert County (N=999) Baltimore City (5073) Washington County...

Anne Arundel County... Wicomico County (N=957) Dorchester County (N=322)

Kent County (N=154) Worcester County (N=640)

Cecil County (N=1090) Saint Mary's County...

Carroll County (N=1641) Queen Anne's County...

Garrett County (N=294) Harford County (N=2316) Allegany County (N=555) Howard County (N=4264)

Talbot County (N=295) Prince George's County... Somerset County (N=207) Baltimore County (N=2301) Charles County (N=1643) Caroline County (N=366)

Correlation of Growth and Professional Practice to Total Rating

Correlation of Student Growth to Total Effectivess Rating without MSA

Correlation of Total Professional Practice to Total Effectivess Rating without MSA

5

00 02 04 06 08 10

Statewide Average Effective Points Earned for Professional Practice Components and SLOs

18.0 16.0 14.0 12.0 10.0

8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 0.0

8.4

8.4

8.3

Planning (2.88) Instruction (3.26) Classroom environment (2.81)

8.2

Professional responsibility

(2.87)

12.3

SLO 1 (9.80)

16.0

SLO 2 (5.84)

6

Correlation of Professional Practice Components and SLOs to Total Rating

7

100 80 60 40 20 0 Ineffe ctive

Allegany Min Max

Effecti ve

Highly Effecti

ve

51.5 79.6 78.9 100

100 80 60 40 20 0 Ineffe ctive

Baltimore City

Min

29

Max

54

Effecti ve

0.0 85.0

Highly Effecti

ve

86.0 100

100

80

60

40

20

0

Ineffec Effecti

tive

ve

Anne Arundel

Min

5

56.0

Max

55

79.0

Highly Effecti

ve

80.0 100

100 80 60 40 20 0 Ineffe ctive

Baltimore County Min Max

23.07 44.89

Effecti ve

2.3 93.2

Highly Effecti

ve

45.5 100

Cut Scores for Teacher Ratings Vary By District

8

 ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download