SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT - Government of New Jersey
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
This Settlement Agreement (¡°Agreement¡±) is entered into among the State of New
Jersey (the ¡°State¡± or ¡°New Jersey¡±), including but not limited to the New Jersey
Department of Environmental Protection (¡°DEP¡± or the ¡°Department¡±); Accutest
Corporation, also known as Accutest Laboratories (¡°Accutest¡±); a corporation headquartered
at 2235 U.S. Highway 130, Dayton, New Jersey 08810, and doing business in the State of
New Jersey, through its authorized representatives; and Relator Koroush Vaziri (the
¡°Relator¡±). The foregoing parties are hereinafter collectively referred to as ¡°the Parties.¡±
PREAMBLE
As a preamble to this Agreement, the Parties agree to the following:
A.
WHEREAS Accutest is a member of a network of environmental testing
laboratories across the United States, each with a common parent owner. Accutest is
engaged in the business of environmental testing services, including but not limited to the
testing of semi-volatile organic compounds. The State and its agencies, including but not
limited to the DEP, have also contracted with Accutest to perform various environmental
tests that were performed in Accutest¡¯s extraction laboratory; and
B.
WHEREAS the Department issued a certification to Accutest to conduct
environmental laboratory testing under the New Jersey National Environmental Laboratory
Accreditation Program (¡°NJ-NELAP¡±) pursuant to The NELAC Institute (¡°TNI¡±) Standards.
(N.J. Certification #12129). See N.J.A.C. 7:18-1.4. Accutest is required to conduct testing in
accordance with the certification, the TNI Standards and N.J.A.C. 7:18; and
C.
WHEREAS on December 3, 4, 11 and 12, 2012, the Department conducted a
routine on-site audit of Accutest (¡°the 2012 Audit¡±) and issued a written report on February
19, 2013. On June 1 through 5, 2015, the Department conducted another routine audit of
Accutest (¡°the 2015 Audit¡±) and issued a written report on July 31, 2015. On September 4,
2015, Accutest submitted an Audit Response. The Department is currently reviewing the
Audit Response; and
D.
WHEREAS on October 8, 2015, the Department issued an Administrative
Order and Notice of Civil Administrative Penalty Assessment (¡°AO/P¡±) to Accutest. The
AO/P assessed a penalty of $224,500.00 for alleged violations of the TNI Standards and the
Department¡¯s regulations. The AO/P also noted that the Department was continuing its
investigation that Accutest allegedly engaged in deviations from EPA and DEP extraction
methods as described in H below; and
E.
WHEREAS on October 28, 2015, Accutest disputed the allegations in the
AO/P and filed a timely request for a hearing on the AO/P in the Office of Administrative
Law; and
F.
WHEREAS the Department contends that Accutest deviated from EPA and
DEP extraction methods during certain periods of time between 2007 and June 2013 in
violation of the TNI standards and N.J.A.C. 7:18-5.1(b) (the ¡°extraction violations¡±). The
alleged violations involved the following methods: USEPA SW846 3510, USEPA SW846
3545, USEPA SW846 3550, USEPA 625, and NJDEP EPH. The DEP contends that
Accutest employees did not always perform the required number of extractions, potentially
preventing the full extraction of all of the compounds in the samples; and
G.
WHEREAS, although the Department contends that the alleged extraction
violations referenced in Paragraph F may have occurred, based upon the Department¡¯s
Page 2 of 25
85614461\V-1
investigation and assessment, the results of the analyses conducted by Accutest are useable;
and
H.
WHEREAS on or about April 4, 2013, Relator filed a qui tam action in the
United States District Court for the District of New Jersey captioned United States of
America, et al., ex rel. Koroush Vaziri v. Accutest Laboratories, Civil Action No. 3:13-CV02223-FLW-TJB pursuant to the United States False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. ¡ì 3729(a) et seq.
(¡°USFCA¡±), the New Jersey False Claims Act, N.J.S.A. ¡ì 2A:32C-1 et seq. (¡°NJFCA¡±), and
the false claims acts of several other states, and then subsequently filed an Amended
Complaint on or about October 9, 2014 (the ¡°Civil Action¡±). The Civil Action alleges that
Accutest violated the NJFCA, by not following appropriate EPA guidelines in the extraction
and testing of certain compounds. Specifically, the Civil Action alleges that some line-level
technicians in Accutest¡¯s Extraction laboratory did not fully comply with the Standard
Operating Procedures for extractions, and that line-level analysts in Accutest¡¯s Semi-Volatile
Organics Laboratory did not properly calibrate the gas chromatography/mass spectrometry
(¡°GC/MS¡±) instruments or maintain instrument data files, and thereby knowingly presented,
and caused to be presented, false claims to, among other entities, the State, and made or
used, and caused to be made or used, false records or statements material to false claims
made to the State, and conspired to do the same; and
I.
WHEREAS, by allegedly engaging in the foregoing conduct with respect to
tests paid for by the State, the State contends that Accutest knowingly deviated from EPA
and DEP extraction methods identified in Paragraph F above, and therefore, presented, and
caused to be presented, false claims to the State, and made or used, and caused to be made or
used, false records or statements material to false claims made to the State, and conspired to
Page 3 of 25
85614461\V-1
do the same. The contentions in Paragraphs F, H I, and K are hereinafter referred to as the
¡°Covered Conduct¡±; and
J.
WHEREAS Relator¡¯s complaint was served on the Office of the Attorney
General of the State of New Jersey (¡°Office of the Attorney General¡±) on or about October
22, 2014 pursuant to the NJFCA, and the Office of the Attorney General thereafter
commenced an investigation in connection with the allegations of the Relator¡¯s complaint;
and
K.
WHEREAS, on November 23, 2015, Accutest informed the Department that
it conducted an internal audit that revealed that it had been performing analyses beyond the
scope of their certification in violation of TNI Standard V1M2 5.4.1 and N.J.A.C. 7:182.12(a). Such analyses included 97 analytes/parameters in drinking water, non-potable
water, and solid/hazardous waste out of roughly 2,300 such analytes/parameters evaluated by
the laboratory; and
L.
WHEREAS, as a result of its investigations, the State contends that it has
certain civil and administrative claims against Accutest under the NJFCA and the
Regulations Governing the Certification of Laboratories and Environmental Measurements,
N.J.A.C. 7:18-1 et seq.; and
M.
WHEREAS, to avoid the delay, uncertainty, and expense of protracted
litigation of the above claims, the Parties have determined and hereby agree that settlement
is in each of their best interests, and the Parties have agreed to accept the terms of the
Agreement; and
Page 4 of 25
85614461\V-1
N.
WHEREAS, Accutest has represented to the State that it is engaged in
discussions concerning a merger with or sale to another entity, which may occur as soon as
December 31, 2015; and
O.
WHEREAS, the Parties enter into this Agreement without trial or
adjudication in order to amicably resolve the alleged Covered Conduct without any
admission of law or fact by any Party provided, however, that in the event of any other
environmental laboratory violations by Accutest, the Department may consider the violations
cited herein as having been proven for purposes of calculating the appropriate penalty level
and specifically for the purpose of determining whether a prior similar violation has
occurred, unless the merger with or sale to the other entity occurs as discussed in Paragraph
N above, and then no enhancement for alleged prior violations shall apply. See N.J.A.C.
7:18-10.5(b), -10.5(c), -10.5(e)(1), -10.5(e)(2).
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and obligations of the
Agreement, the Parties agree fully and finally to settle the Civil Action and the matters
described above pursuant to the Terms and Conditions below:
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
1.
Accutest shall take whatever actions are necessary to achieve and maintain
compliance with the Regulations Governing the Certification of Laboratories and
Environmental Measurements, N.J.A.C. 7:18-1 et seq. and the TNI Standards.
2.
Accutest shall correct the alleged violations found in the 2015 Audit that are
set forth in the AO/P and the violations identified in Accutest¡¯s internal audit in Paragraph K
above. The Department agrees that it will not assess any additional penalties for this past
conduct. However, the Department considers the requirements to correct these violations as
Page 5 of 25
85614461\V-1
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
- united states district court district of new jersey
- state of new jersey civil service commission
- swim club owners that barred minorities to pay 1 000 000 aclu nj
- settlement agreement and mutual release government of new jersey
- settlement agreement government of new jersey
- state of new jersey department of the treasury government of new jersey
- guidance for attorneys and pro se litigants government of new jersey
- publication 4345 rev 11 2022 irs tax forms
- objection clean diapers dirty class action settlements
- civilactionno 3 16 md 2738 flw inre johnson johnson
Related searches
- state of new jersey department of treasury
- state of new jersey department of education
- university of new jersey city
- state of new jersey directory
- state of new jersey sec of state
- state of new jersey department of labor
- state of new jersey business registration
- state of new jersey name availability
- state of new jersey company registration lookup
- state of new jersey corporation search
- state of new jersey certificate of formation
- state of new jersey homepage