University of Louisiana at Monroe
University of Louisiana at Monroe
School of Nursing
Peer Review
of
TEACHING IN A CLASSROOM SETTING
|Course & Session: | |5 = Excellent |
|Teacher: | |4 = Above Average |
|Date: | |3 = Average |
| | |2 = Below Average |
| | |1 = Poor |
| | |N/A = Not applicable |
|CRITERIA |SCORE |
|1. Content presented was consistent with expected outcomes. | |
|2. Presentation was clear, well-organized including beginning and ending on time. | |
| | |
|Beginning Time: End Time: | |
|3. Teaching methods used were appropriate. | |
|4. Avoided distracting mannerisms. (i.e., excessive reading of | |
|notes/other distracting styles) | |
|5. Examples support content presented. | |
|6. Answered and posed questions. | |
|7. Participation of students was encouraged. | |
|Comments: |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|Signature (Evaluator): | |Date: | |
|Responses by person being evaluated: |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|Signature (Evaluatee): | |Date: | |
University of Louisiana at Monroe
School of Nursing
Peer Review
Of
TEACHING IN A CLASSROOM SETTING
GUIDELINES FOR PEER EVALUATION
1. The appropriate Coordinator will complete a peer evaluation on new
faculty for his/her first two semesters of teaching.
2. Peer evaluations are to be completed on all full-time and part-time faculty, but not guest lecturers.
3. Following the first two semesters of employment non-tenured faculty will be evaluated each semester by a faculty member designated by the Coordinator.
4. Tenured faculty will be evaluated annually by a faculty member designated by the Coordinator.
5. The Coordinator will be evaluated annually by a faculty member designated by the Director.
6. The original Peer Evaluation will be submitted to the faculty member being evaluated; two copies will be made and submitted to the Coordinator and Director.
7. In addition to the required peer evaluations, faculty may request additional evaluations for formative purposes. These may be conducted by the faculty member of their choice.
Revised 9/09
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
- saving renaming files peer feedback form
- es l nursing peer review principles i f o r and practice
- advancing nursing peer review at mgh to improve quality
- nursing performance evaluations michigan medicine
- nursing peer review laura cook harrington rn
- nursing education needs assessment centura health
- colleague classroom teaching evaluation wsu nursing
- duson duke university school of nursing
- peer review policy and procedure hendricks community
- university of louisiana at monroe
Related searches
- university of illinois at chicago online
- university of illinois at champaign
- university of illinois at urbana champaign il
- university of texas at austin
- university of illinois at urbana champaign
- university of illinois at urbana champaign ranking
- university of illinois at chicago
- university of illinois at springfield
- university of california at irvine ca
- university of louisiana online
- university of illinois at urbana champaign address
- university of california at berkeley