No. A- IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
No. A-________ IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
PENNSYLVANIA DEMOCRATIC PARTY, ET AL,
Plaintiffs-Respondents, v.
KATHY BOOCKVAR, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS PENNSYLVANIA SECRETARY OF STATE, ET AL., Defendants-Respondents, and
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA,
Intervenor-Applicant.
Application from the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania (No. 133 MM 2020)
EMERGENCY APPLICATION FOR INJUNCTION PENDING CERTIORARI REVIEW
KATHLEEN GALLAGHER RUSSELL D. GIANCOLA PORTER WRIGHT MORRIS
& ARTHUR LLP 6 PPG Place, Third Floor Pittsburgh, PA 15222 Phone: (412) 235-4500
JOHN M. GORE Counsel of Record
ALEX POTAPOV JONES DAY 51 Louisiana Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20001 Phone: (202) 879-3939 jmgore@
Counsel for Applicant
RULE 29.6 STATEMENT As required by Supreme Court Rule 29.6, Applicant hereby submits the following corporate-disclosure statement.
1. Applicant has no parent corporation. 2. No publicly held corporation owns any portion of Applicant, and
Applicant is not a subsidiary or an affiliate of any publicly owned corporation.
Date: November 6, 2020
/s/ John M. Gore JOHN M. GORE JONES DAY 51 Louisiana Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20001 (202) 879-3939 jmgore@
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS Page
RULE 29.6 STATEMENT ............................................................................................. i INDEX OF APPENDICES .......................................................................................... iii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ........................................................................................ iv OPINIONS BELOW ..................................................................................................... 6 STATEMENT OF THE CASE...................................................................................... 6 JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT .............................................................................. 8 REASONS FOR GRANTING THE APPLICATION ................................................... 8 CONCLUSION............................................................................................................ 11
ii
INDEX OF APPENDICES
Page APPENDIX A: Majority Opinion by Justice Baer, Supreme Court of
Pennsylvania, Middle District (Sept. 17, 2020)..............................................A.01 APPENDIX B: Concurring Opinion by Justice Wecht, Supreme Court of
Pennsylvania, Middle District (Sept. 17, 2020)..............................................A.64 APPENDIX C: Concurring and Dissenting Opinion by Justice Donohue,
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Middle District (Sept. 17, 2020) ...............A.76 APPENDIX D: Concurring and Dissenting Opinion by Chief Justice Saylor,
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Middle District (Sept. 17, 2020) ...............A.88 APPENDIX E: Per Curiam Order Denying the Applications for Stay,
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Middle District (Sept. 24, 2020) ...............A.92 APPENDIX F: Dissenting Statement of the Order Denying the
Applications for Stay by Justice Mundy, Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Middle District (Sept. 24, 2020)..............................................A.95 APPENDIX G: Letter from the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Refusing to Consider Request to Segregate Ballots Received After the General Assembly's Deadline (Oct. 26, 2020) ...............................................................A.99 APPENDIX H: Canvassing Segregated Mail-In And Civilian Absentee Ballots Received After 8:00 P.M. On Tuesday, November 3, 2020 And Before 5:00 P.M. On Friday, November 6, 2020 (Nov. 1, 2020) ...........A.113 APPENDIX I: Correspondence..............................................................................A.117
iii
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
Page(s) CASES Bush v. Gore,
531 U.S. 98 (2000) .................................................................................................. 10 Bush v. Gore,
531 U.S. 1046 (2000) .............................................................................................. 11 Bush v. Palm Beach Cnty. Canvassing Bd.,
531 U.S. 70 (2000) (per curiam) ............................................................................. 10 Chafin v. Chafin,
568 U.S. 165 (2013) ................................................................................................ 10 Democratic Nat'l Comm. v. Wis. State Legislature,
No. 20A66, slip op. (U.S. Oct. 26, 2020)................................................................. 10 Hamilton v. Johnson,
141 A. 846 (Pa. 1928)................................................................................................ 4 John Doe Agency v. John Doe Corp.,
488 U.S. 1306 (1989) .............................................................................................. 10 Lucas v. Townsend,
486 U.S. 1301 (1988) ................................................................................................ 9 Maryland v. King,
133 S. Ct. 1 (2012) .................................................................................................... 1 Perzel v. Cortes,
870 A.2d 759 (Pa. 2005)............................................................................................ 4 Purcell v. Gonzalez,
549 U.S. 1 (2006) .................................................................................................... 10 Republican Party of Pa. v. Boockvar,
No. 20A54 (U.S. Oct. 19, 2020) ........................................................................ 1, 7, 9 Republican Party of Pa. v. Boockvar,
No. 20-542, slip op. (U.S. Oct. 28, 2020) .........................................................passim Scarnati v. Boockvar,
No. 20A53 (U.S. Oct. 19, 2020) ................................................................................ 1 CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY AUTHORITIES U.S. Const. art. I .......................................................................................................... 10 U.S. Const. art. II......................................................................................................... 10
iv
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
- no a in the supreme court of the united states
- j 96 2020 in the supreme court of pennsylvania
- not precedential
- in the supreme court of the united states
- in the supreme court of pennsylvania
- supreme court of the united states ohio state university
- in the supreme court of the united states office of the
- t supreme court of the united states
- pennsylvania case u s supreme court rejects trump allies
- r supreme court of the united states
Related searches
- vice president of the united states office
- president of the united states job description
- history of the united states flag
- ranks of the united states army
- sociologists think of the united states as
- list of the united states alphabetically
- title 26 of the united states code
- president of the united states list
- weather map of the united states today
- constitution of the united states printable pdf
- populations of the united states in 2020
- racial makeup of the united states 2020