Student outcomes and educational facilities
Literature reviews and reports on student outcomes and educational facilities
Design Council (2005), “The Impact of School Environments. A Literature Review”.
Earthman, G. (2002), “School Facility Conditions and Student Academic Achievement”, UCLA/IDEA, University of California.
Earthman, G. (2004), “Prioritisation of 31 Criteria for School Building Adequacy”.
Earthman, G. and L. Lemasters (1996), “Review of Research on the Relationship between School Buildings, Student Achievement, and Student Behaviour”, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Council of Educational Facility Planners.
Fisher, K. (2000), “Building Better Outcomes. The Impact of School Infrastructure on Student Outcomes and Behaviour”, Schools Issues Digest, Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs, Australian Government.
OECD (2006a), “Exploring Possible Synergies between PEB and the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA)”, Paper presented to the PEB Governing Board at its 37th Session.
OECD (2004), Learning for Tomorrow’s World: First Results from PISA 2003, OECD, Paris.
PriceWaterHouseCoopers (2000), “Building Performance: An Empirical Assessment of the Relationship between Schools Capital Investment and Pupil Performance“, Department for Education and Skills, United Kingdom..uk/research/data/uploadfiles/RR407.pdf.
Conceptual frameworks for evaluating quality in educational facilities
DfES (2004), Transforming Schools: An Inspirational Guide to Remodelling Secondary Schools, DfES, London.
Building Research Establishment (BRE) (2005), Schools Environmental Assessment Method, BRE, Watford.
Fielding, R. (2006), “Best Practice in Action: Six Essential Elements that Define Educational Facility Design”, CEFPI Planner, December.
Hawkins, H.L. and H.E. Lilley (1998), Guide for School Facility Appraisal, Council for Educational Facility Planners, International, Scottsdale.
OECD (2005a), “Evaluating Quality in Educational Facilities”, PEB Exchange, No. 57, February. edu/facilities/evaluatingquality.
Preiser, W. and J.C. Vischer (Eds.) (2005), Assessing Building Performance, Elsevier, Oxford.
Local or national performance standards and design indicators
Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment (CABE) (2006), “Assessing Secondary School Design Quality”, London. .uk/AssetLibrary/8736.pdf.
DfES and CABE (2005), Picturing School Design. A Visual Guide to Secondary School Buildings and their Surroundings using the Design Quality Indicators for Schools, CABE, London.
Qualitative research tools (including Post-Occupancy Evaluation )
Higher Education Funding Council for Europe (HEFCE), Association of University Directors of Estates (AUDE) and University of Westminster (2006), “Guide to Post-Occupancy Evaluation”, London. aude.ac.uk/uploads/POE%20Brochure%20Final%2006.pdf.
Lackney, J. (2001), “The State of Post-Occupancy Evaluation in the Practice of Educational Design”, paper presented to Environmental Design Research Association, EDRA 32, Edinburgh, Scotland, 5 July 2001.
Ministry of Education, New Zealand (2004), “Best Practice in Classroom Design”, AC Neilsen. t.nz/index.cfm?layout=document&documentid=10367&data=l.
Ornstein, S. (1997), “Post-Occupancy Evaluation Performed in Elementary and High Schools pf Greater São Paulo, Brazil: The Occupants and the Quality of the School Environment”, Environment and Behaviouriou, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 236-263.
Sanoff, H. (2001), “School Building Assessment Methods”, NCEF, Washington, D.C. pubs/sanoffassess.pdf.
Scottish Executive (2006), Post-Occupancy Evaluation. Braes High School, Falkirk, Scottish Executive, Edinburgh. .uk/Publications/2006/01/23112827.
Watson, C. (2003), “Review of Building Quality Using Post Occupancy Evaluation”, PEB Exchange, February.
Zimring, C., M. Rashid and K. Kampschroer (2005), “Facility Performance Evaluation (FPE)”, National Institute of Building Sciences (NIBS), Washington. design/fpe.php.
Case study-based approaches
OECD (2006b), 3rd Compendium of Exemplary Educational Facilities, OECD, Paris. edu/facilities.
CEFPI school design awards ().
DesignShare awards ().
Research themes on the physical learning environment
Theme 1. Physical comfort in the physical learning environment
Air quality and thermal comfort (temperature and humidity)
Myhrvold, A.N., E. Olsen and O. Lauridsen (1996), “Indoor Environment in Schools – Pupils Health and Performance in regard to CO2 Concentrations”, Indoor Air, The Seventh International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate, Vol. 4, pp. 369-371.
Rosen, K.G. and G. Richardson (1999), “Would Removing Indoor Air Particulates in Children’s Environments Reduce the Rate of Absenteeism? A Hypothesis”, The Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 234, pp. 87-93.
Smedje, G. and D. Norback (2001), “Irritants and Allergens at School in Relation to Furnishings and Cleaning”, Indoor Air, Vol. 11, pp. 127–133.
Rittelmeyer, P.C. (1992), “Healthy Schools”, Paper presented at an international seminar organised by the Austrian Federal Ministry of Education and Art, the Austrian Institute for School and Sports Facilities and OECD, Vienna, Austria, 508 October 1992.
Acoustic control
Vilatarsana, G. (2004), “The Environmental Noise Exposure of Schools around Heathrow”, M.Sc. Dissertation, South Bank University. whyverne.co.uk/acoustics/pages/pdf/gael.pdf.
Lighting
Benya, J.R. (2001), “Lighting for Schools”, NCEF, Washington, D.C. 66.117.48.53/pubs/lighting.pdf.
Heschong Mahone Group (2003), “Windows and Classrooms: A Study of Student Performance and the Indoor Environment”, California Energy Commission. 003_save_energy/003c_edu_train/pec/daylight/di_pubs/SchoolDetailed820App.PDF.
Jago, E. and K. Tanner (1999), “Influence of the School Facility on Student Achievement: Lighting; Color”, Department of Educational Leadership, University of Georgia. coe.uga.edu/sdpl/researchabstracts/visual.html.
Furniture quality
Breithecker, D. (2005), “The Educational Workplace: What the ‘Classroom of the Future’ Will Look Like”, Federal Working Group for Posture and Mobilization Support, Wiesbaden, Germany. bag-haltungundbewegung.de/fileadmin/bag/binary/BAG-Endbericht-k_US.pdf.
Cardon, G., D. De Clercqa, I. De Bourdeaudhuija and D. Breithecker (2004), “Sitting Habits in Elementary Schoolchildren: A Traditional versus a ‘Moving School’”, Patient Education and Counseling, Vol. 54, No. 2.
Kanea, P.J., M. Pilcherb and S.J. Legg (2006), “Development of a Furniture System to Match Student Needs in New Zealand Schools”, International Ergonomic Association. ergonomics4children/pdfs/art0225.pdf.
Theme 2. Space and flexibility of the physical learning environment
Bissell, J. (2002), “Teachers’ Construction and Use of Space”, Texas Tech University, Lubbock. www2.arch.ttu.edu/haq/EDRAMOVE/2004/JBissell.pdf.
Fisher, K. (2005), “Linking Pedagogy and Space”. sofweb.vic.edu.au/knowledgebank/pdfs/linking_pedagogy_and_space.pdf.
Lackney, J. and P.J. Jacobs (2002), “Teachers as Placemakers: Investigating Teachers’ Use of the Physical Learning Environment in Instructional Design”, School Design Research Studio at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. schoolstudio.engr.wisc.edu/placemakers.html.
Lang, D.C. (2002), “Teacher Interactions within the Physical Environment: How Teachers Alter Their Space and/or Routines because of Classroom Character”, Dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle. eric.ERICWebPortal/.
Nigaglioni, I. (2006), “Thinking Outside the Box: Reinventing the Traditional Classroom”, Educational Facility Planner, Vol. 40, No. 3/4, pp. 3-8. content/Journal40-3and4-CEFPI.pdf.
Wolff, S. (2002), Design Features for Project-Based Learning, Oregon State University.
Rivera-Batizm F.L. and L. Marti (1995), “A School System at Risk: A Study of the Consequences of Overcrowding in New York City Public Schools”, Institute for Urban and Minority Education, Teachers’College, Columbia University, New York. columbia.edu/~flr9/immigedu.pdf.
Theme 3. Condition of the physical learning environment (renovation, maintenance and age)
Building Educational Success Together (BEST) (2006), “Growth and Disparity: A Decade of U.S. Public School Construction”, BEST. pubs/GrowthandDisparity.pdf.
Maxwell, L.E. (1999), “School Building Renovation and Student Performance: One District’s Experience”, Council of Educational Facility Planners, Scottsdale.
Phillips, R. (1997), “Educational Facility Age and the Academic Achievement of Upper Elementary School Students”, PhD dissertation, University of Georgia.
Policy Link and Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF) (2005), “Ending School Overcrowding in California: Building Quality Schools for All Children”, Policy Link, Oakland. pdfs/EndingSchoolOvercrowding.pdf.
Theme 4. Health and safety of the physical learning environment
Building Research Establishment (BRE) (2005), Schools Environmental Assessment Method, BRE, Watford.
NCEF (2006), Resource list for CPTED, NCEF, Washington, D.C. rl/cpted.cfm.
Theme 5. Student engagement with the physical learning environment
Involving students in decisions concerning their physical learning environment
Burke, C. and I. Grosvenor (2003), The School I'd Like: Children and Young People's Reflections on an Education for the 21st Century, RoutledgeFalmer, New York.
Jarman, D., L. Webb T.C. and Chan (2004), “A Beautiful School is a Caring School”, School Business Affairs, June.
Sanoff, H. (2002), “Schools Designed with Community Participation”, NCEF, Washington, D.C. pubs/sanoffschools.pdf.
Sorrell Foundation (2003), joinedupdesignforschools, Sorrell Foundation, London.
Aesthetic quality
Jago, E. and K. Tanner (1999), “Influence of the School Facility on Student Achievement: Lighting; Color”, Department of Educational Leadership, University of Georgia. coe.uga.edu/sdpl/researchabstracts/visual.html.
Killeen, J.P., G.W. Evans and S. Danko (2003), “The Role of Permanent Student Artwork in Students’ Sense of Ownership in an Elementary School”, Environment and Behaviour, Vo. 24, No. 2, pp. 250-263.
Maxwell, L.E. (2000), “A Safe and Welcoming School: What Students, Parents and Parents Think”, Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, Vol. 17, No. 4 pp. 271-282.
Sustainable schools
Building Research Establishment (BRE) (2005), Schools Environmental Assessment Method, BRE, Watford.
Department for Education and Skills, UK (DfES) (2006), “Government Response to the Consultation on the Sustainable Schools Strategy”, DfES, London.
Department of the Environment and Heritage, Australia (2006), “Comparative Assessment: Australian Sustainable Schools Initiative Pilot Programme in NSW and Victoria”, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra. .au/education/publications/comparative-assessment.html.
Lieberman, G. and L. Hoody (1998), “Closing the Achievement Gap: Using the Environment as an Integrating Context for Learning”, State Education and Environment Roundtable, Poway CA.
National Environmental Education and Training Foundation (NEETF) (2000), “Environment-Based Education: Creating High Performance Schools and Students”, NEETF, Washington, D.C. pubs/NEETF8400.pdf.
Theme 6. Accessibility to the physical learning environment
Community use of the physical learning environment
Blank, M.J., A. Melville and B.P. Shah (2003), “Making the Difference: Research and Practice in Community Schools”, Coalition for Community Schools, Washington, DC. SFullReport.pdf.
Brown, K. and K. White (2006), “Exploring the Evidence Base for Integrated Children’s Services”, Scottish Executive Education Department, Edinburgh. .uk/Resource/Doc/90282/0021746.pdf.
Cummings, D., A. Dyson and L. Todd (2004), “Evaluation of the Extended Schools Pathfinder Projects”, Research Report No. 530, University of Newcastle-Upon-Tyne and Department for Education and Skills, UK. .uk/research/data/uploadfiles/RR530.pdf.
Sammons, P., S. Power, K. Elliot, P. Robertson, C. Campbell and Whitty, G. (2003), “New Community Schools in Scotland Final Report. National Evaluation of the Pilot Phase”, Institute of Education, University of London. .uk/Resource/Doc/933/0007611.pdf.
Wilken, A., R. White and K. Kinder (2003), “Towards Extended Schools: a Literature Review”, Research Report RR432, National Foundation of Educational Research for England & Wales, Slough. .uk/research/data/uploadfiles/RR432.pdf.
Provision for students with special needs
Abend, A. (2001), “Planning and Designing for Students with Disabilities”, National Clearinghouse for Educational Facilities (NCEF), Washington, D.C. .
DfES (2005, revised), Building Bulletin 77. Designing for Pupils with Special Educational Needs and Disabilities in Schools, DfES, London.
Le Monde (2005), “La loi sur le handicap à l’épreuve du terrain”, La Lettre de l’Éducation, Supplement to No. 501, 17 October.
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
- our working definition of student achievement and school
- academic achievement prediction role of interest in
- effect of modular learning approach on the
- student academic engagement and the academic
- student achievement national conference of state
- factors affecting the academic achievement a study of
- student achievement factors ed
- the effects of domestic violence on high school
- summary of academic achievement and functional
- student outcomes and educational facilities
Related searches
- student loans and home buying
- medical student documentation and cms
- florida student scholarship and grant
- student loans and buying a house
- student loans and tax refund
- florida student grants and scholarships
- student debt and home buying
- student loans and government employees
- student loans and tax returns
- student loans and income tax returns
- college student benefits and discounts
- student loan and tax refund