2019 State A-F Accountability Rating System

Contact Information:

Dr. Eduardo Cancino, Deputy Director Division of Instructional Leadership, School Improvement and College Readiness Support (956) 984-6022 | ecancino@

Dr. Belinda S. Gorena, Administrator Office of School Improvement, Accountability and Compliance (956) 984-6173 | bgorena@

Kelly VanHee, Administrator Office of Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment (956) 984-6151 | kkvanhee@

Melissa I. Lopez, Director Office of College, Career and Life Readiness (956) 984-6046 | mlopez@

Region One Education Service Center

Division of Instructional Leadership, School Improvement and College Readiness Support

2019 State A-F Accountability Rating System

Domains, Components, Indicators, and Core Metrics

11 Core Components of the Domain Framework Achievement, Growth, and Gap Closure Expectations

As you know, the 2018 State Accountability System assigned A-F performance ratings at the District level and Met Standard or Improvement Required performance ratings at the Campus level. The 2019 Texas State A-F Accountability System will now utilize A-F performance ratings at the District and Campus level using expanded measures of learning comprised of 3 Domains, 11 Components, 15 Indicators, and 115 Core Metrics. School System Success and Quality is evaluated relative to performance on 11 key components that reflect Academic Achievement, Academic Growth, and Gap Closure. These 11 Domain Components are defined by 15 Indicators that are integrated into each of Domain I, Domain II, and Domain III.

Region One Education Service Center personnel have been provided updated training by the TEA Student Assessment Division regarding developments and specific changes to key Core Metrics used to evaluate levels of performance, progress, and attainment for respective Domain performance. Participants will be provided overview, methodology, and computation for each of the 11 Domain Indicators.

Region One ESC personnel from the offices of Teaching and Learning, School Improvement, College and Career Readiness, Advanced Academics, Special Populations, Career and Technology, and PEIMS will guide participants in collaborative discussion on program effectiveness and quality processes relative to Domain performance levels, Distinction Designation attainment, and State/Federal Improvement Required and Targeted/Comprehensive school supports.

This session will provide an opportunity for learning, engaged participation, and sharing of best practices.

Workshop #91168

September 25, 2018

8:30 am--4:00 pm

Region One ESC--Edinburg Fort Ringgold / Fort McIntosh Rooms

Fee: $125.00 per Participant

School System Leadership Team: Recommended Team comprised of District Level Instructional and Special Populations Leadership, Campus Level Leadership, and Testing and Evaluation Personnel. Please contact Ms. Kelly VanHee at (956) 984-6151 or Dr. Belinda S. Gorena at (956) 984-6173 if additional session information is needed.

Register Online at staffdevelopment

Contact Information:

Dr. Eduardo Cancino, Deputy Director Division of Instructional, School Improvement and College Readiness Support (956) 984-6022 | ecancino@

Dr. Belinda S. Gorena, Administrator Office of School Improvement, Accountability and Compliance (956) 984-6173 | bgorena@

Kelly VanHee, Administrator Office of Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment (956) 984-6151 | kkvanhee@

Melissa I. Lopez, Director Office of College, Career and Life Readiness (956) 984-6046 | mlopez@

Region One Education Service Center

Division of Instructional Leadership, School Improvement and College Readiness Support

2019 State A-F Accountability Rating System College, Career, and Military Readiness Component

Expansion of CCMR Options for 2019 Accountability Program Participation, Data Collection, and Data Quality

The 2019 State Accountability System brings changes to the College, Career, and Military Readiness (CCMR) component of the Domain Framework. Eight CCMR Options were available to students that measure graduates' preparedness for college, the workforce, or the military. For the August 2019 State Accountability Ratings, the CCMR Options have expanded from eight to eleven and, specifically, TEA will implement a five-year transition from CTE coherent sequence coursework to industry-based certification.

Region One Education Service Center personnel have been provided updated training by the TEA Student Assessment Division regarding these specific changes to the CCMR Options currently available to students. As you know, school system data, related to CCMR Options available to students, used in current year accountability rating system calculations is based on prior year information and thus data collection and data quality efforts are still available through Fall PEIMS submission.

Region One ESC personnel from the offices of College and Career Readiness, Career and Technology, PEIMS, and Teaching and Learning will be providing updated 2019 Accountability CCMR Options training and will focus on the following key areas: Program Participation, Data Collection and Coding Processes, and Data Quality Reviews. In addition, implications of CCMR Options computation methodology within the Domain I, Domain II, and Domain III Accountability Framework will be presented.

This session will provide an opportunity for learning, engaged participation, and sharing of best practices.

Option 1 - AM Session

Workshop #97838 September 18, 2018

8:30 am--11:30 am

Region One ESC--Edinburg Fort Ringgold Room

Fee: $75.00 per Participant

Option 2 - PM Session

Workshop #98636 September 18, 2018

1:00 pm--4:00 pm

Region One ESC--Edinburg Fort Ringgold Room

Fee: $75.00 per Participant

School System Leadership Team: Recommended Leadership Team comprised of District Level Administrator, Campus Level Administrator, High School Counselor, Testing and Evaluation Personnel, PEIMS Coordinator, and CTE Personnel. Please contact Dr. Belinda Gorena at (956) 984-6173 if additional session information is needed.

Register Online at staffdevelopment

Texas State A-F Accountability System

Domains, Components, Indicators, and Core Metrics Data Used to Calculate and Assign Accountability Ratings

Domain

Domain I Student Achievement

Component

STAAR CCMR** Graduation Rate**

Indicator

Performance on Grade Level Standards CCMR Graduates

Highest of 4, 5, or 6 Year Graduation Rate

Core Metrics

3 Performance Levels 11 CCMR Options 1

Domain II School Progress

Part A: Academic Growth

Part B: Relative Performance

Meet STAAR Progress Measure or Maintain Proficiency

Domain I: STAAR Component Raw Score

Domain I: CCMR Component Raw Score**

Economically Disadvantaged Percentage

1

1 1 1

Domain III Closing the Gaps

Academic Achievement

Academic Growth

Federal Graduation Rate**

English Language Proficiency

Student Success School Quality**

ELA/Reading: STAAR Performance Status at Meets or Above

Mathematics: STAAR Performance Status at Meets or Above

ELA/Reading: Academic Growth Mathematics: Academic Growth

Four-Year Federal Graduation Rate

TELPAS Progress Rate

Domain I: STAAR Component Only CCMR Performance

14 Student Groups

14 Student Groups 14 Student Groups 14 Student Groups 11 Student Groups

1 14 Student Groups 14 Student Groups

Total Number of Potential Core Metrics Evaluated:

115

*Closing the Gaps Domain: The total number of indicators evaluated for this Domain varies by campus and district type. According to TEA, there is no case where a campus or district would be evaluated on every single one of the indicators in this

domain. **Applicable to High School, K-12, AEA, or District Level only.

? 2018

Division of Instructional Leadership, School Improvement, and College Readiness Support

Texas State A-F Accountability System

Domains, Components, Indicators, and Core Metrics Performance Category 1 - Academic Achievement Measures

Domain

Domain I Student Achievement

Component

STAAR CCMR** Graduation Rate**

Indicator

Performance on Grade Level Standards CCMR Graduates

Highest of 4, 5, or 6 Year Graduation Rate

Core Metrics

3 Performance Levels 11 CCMR Options 1

Domain II School Progress

Part A: Academic Growth

Part B: Relative Performance

Meet STAAR Progress Measure or Maintain Proficiency

Domain I: STAAR Component Raw Score

Domain I: CCMR Component Raw Score**

Economically Disadvantaged Percentage

1

1 1 1

Domain III Closing the Gaps

Academic Achievement

Academic Growth

Federal Graduation Rate**

English Language Proficiency

Student Success School Quality**

ELA/Reading: STAAR Performance Status at Meets or Above

Mathematics: STAAR Performance Status at Meets or Above

ELA/Reading: Academic Growth Mathematics: Academic Growth

Four-Year Federal Graduation Rate

TELPAS Progress Rate

Domain I: STAAR Component Only CCMR Performance

14 Student Groups

14 Student Groups 14 Student Groups 14 Student Groups 11 Student Groups

1 14 Student Groups 14 Student Groups

Total Number of Potential Core Metrics Evaluated:

115

*Closing the Gaps Domain: The total number of indicators evaluated for this Domain varies by campus and district type. According to TEA, there is no case where a campus or district would be evaluated on every single one of the indicators in this

domain. **Applicable to High School, K-12, AEA, or District Level only.

? 2018

Division of Instructional Leadership, School Improvement, and College Readiness Support

Texas State A-F Accountability System

Domains, Components, Indicators, and Core Metrics Performance Category 2 - Academic Growth Measures

Domain

Domain I Student Achievement

Component

STAAR CCMR** Graduation Rate**

Indicator

Performance on Grade Level Standards CCMR Graduates

Highest of 4, 5, or 6 Year Graduation Rate

Core Metrics

3 Performance Levels 11 CCMR Options 1

Domain II School Progress

Part A: Academic Growth

Part B: Relative Performance

Meet STAAR Progress Measure or Maintain Proficiency

Domain I: STAAR Component Raw Score

Domain I: CCMR Component Raw Score**

Economically Disadvantaged Percentage

1

1 1 1

Domain III Closing the Gaps

Academic Achievement

Academic Growth

Federal Graduation Rate**

English Language Proficiency

Student Success School Quality**

ELA/Reading: STAAR Performance Status at Meets or Above

Mathematics: STAAR Performance Status at Meets or Above

ELA/Reading: Academic Growth Mathematics: Academic Growth

Four-Year Federal Graduation Rate

TELPAS Progress Rate

Domain I: STAAR Component Only CCMR Performance

14 Student Groups

14 Student Groups 14 Student Groups 14 Student Groups 11 Student Groups

1 14 Student Groups 14 Student Groups

Total Number of Potential Core Metrics Evaluated:

115

*Closing the Gaps Domain: The total number of indicators evaluated for this Domain varies by campus and district type. According to TEA, there is no case where a campus or district would be evaluated on every single one of the indicators in this

domain. **Applicable to High School, K-12, AEA, or District Level only.

? 2018

Division of Instructional Leadership, School Improvement, and College Readiness Support

Texas State A-F Accountability System

Domains, Components, Indicators, and Core Metrics Performance Category 3 ? Program Participation, Data Collection, and Data Quality Measures

Domain

Domain I Student Achievement

Component

STAAR CCMR** Graduation Rate**

Indicator

Performance on Grade Level Standards CCMR Graduates

Highest of 4, 5, or 6 Year Graduation Rate

Core Metrics

3 Performance Levels 11 CCMR Options 1

Domain II School Progress

Part A: Academic Growth

Part B: Relative Performance

Meet STAAR Progress Measure or Maintain Proficiency

Domain I: STAAR Component Raw Score

Domain I: CCMR Component Raw Score**

Economically Disadvantaged Percentage

1

1 1 1

Domain III Closing the Gaps

Academic Achievement

Status

Academic Growth Status

Federal Graduation Rate**

English Language Proficiency

Student Success School Quality**

ELA/Reading: STAAR Performance Status at Meets or Above

Mathematics: STAAR Performance Status at Meets or Above

ELA/Reading: Academic Growth Mathematics: Academic Growth

Four-Year Federal Graduation Rate

TELPAS Progress Rate

Domain I: STAAR Component Only CCMR Performance

14 Student Groups

14 Student Groups 14 Student Groups 14 Student Groups 11 Student Groups

1 14 Student Groups 14 Student Groups

Total Number of Potential Core Metrics Evaluated:

115

*Closing the Gaps Domain: The total number of indicators evaluated for this Domain varies by campus and district type. According to TEA, there is no case where a campus or district would be evaluated on every single one of the indicators in this

domain. **Applicable to High School, K-12, AEA, or District Level only.

? 2018

Division of Instructional Leadership, School Improvement, and College Readiness Support

Texas State A-F Accountability System

Domains, Components, Indicators, and Core Metrics Performance Category 3 ? Program Participation, Data Collection, and Data Quality Measures

Domain

Domain I Student Achievement

Component

STAAR CCMR** Graduation Rate**

Indicator

Performance on Grade Level Standards CCMR Graduates

Highest of 4, 5, or 6 Year Graduation Rate

Core Metrics

3 Performance Levels 11 CCMR Options 1

Domain II School Progress

Part A: Academic Growth

Part B: Relative Performance

Meet STAAR Progress Measure or Maintain Proficiency

Domain I: STAAR Component Raw Score

Domain I: CCMR Component Raw Score**

Economically Disadvantaged Percentage

1

1 1 1

Domain III Closing the Gaps

Academic Achievement

Status

Academic Growth Status

Federal Graduation Rate**

English Language Proficiency

Student Success School Quality**

ELA/Reading: STAAR Performance Status at Meets or Above

Mathematics: STAAR Performance Status at Meets or Above

ELA/Reading: Academic Growth Mathematics: Academic Growth

Four-Year Federal Graduation Rate

TELPAS Progress Rate

Domain I: STAAR Component Only CCMR Performance

14 Student Groups

14 Student Groups 14 Student Groups 14 Student Groups 11 Student Groups

1 14 Student Groups 14 Student Groups

Total Number of Potential Core Metrics Evaluated:

115

*Closing the Gaps Domain: The total number of indicators evaluated for this Domain varies by campus and district type. According to TEA, there is no case where a campus or district would be evaluated on every single one of the indicators in this

domain. **Applicable to High School, K-12, AEA, or District Level only.

? 2018

Division of Instructional Leadership, School Improvement, and College Readiness Support

2018 State Accountability Regional College, Career, and Military Readiness (CCMR) Analysis School System CCMR Options - Percent Meeting Performance Criteria

District VANGUARD SOUTH TEXAS IDEA LA VILLA HIDALGO POINT ISABEL ROMA SANTA ROSA MCALLEN SHARYLAND VALLEY VIEW MERCEDES PSJA PROGRESO UNITED EDINBURG MISSION SANTA MARIA BROWNSVILLE LOS FRESNOS SAN PERLITA JIM HOGG LA JOYA LYFORD LAREDO HARLINGEN WESLACO ZAPATA LASARA MONTE ALTO RAYMONDVILLE SAN ISIDRO LA FERIA SAN BENITO RIO GRANDE DONNA EDCOUCH-ELSA WEBB RIO HONDO MIDVALLEY GATEWAY

CCMR OPTIONS

TSI DUAL AP/IB M E CTE I C A D

66 84 58

1

75.8 67.9 65.7 1.2 4.2 12.7

36.1 1.2 73.6

39.5 42.1

13.2

18.4

51.1 61.8 42.2 1.3 0.7 5.8 24.9

59 53.7 27.6 2.2

1.5

65.9 37.6 40.4

2.4

53.2 40.4 10.6 5.3 0.5

46.8 42.9 33.6 0.8 3.5 7.6 4.5

49.5 44.6 32.7 2.6 1.7 7 0.5

32.4 36.5 47.3 0.3 2.9 15.5 15.9

36.1 39.1 16.3 3.1 6.8 8.8

31.6 57.2 22.7 3.2 3.8 3.4 14.6

19.4 59.2 2.9 2.9 2.9

28.2 19.4 27.5 3.3 15.7 1.1

37.6 36.7 26.6 1.2 3.8 5.9

34.7 44.1 17.1 6.1 4.1 9.5 6

31 12.1 31

21.6

43.9 18.7 22.4 1.8 5.9 4

41.2 28.6 16.6 3.7 4 10

50 29.2

8.3

45.6

1.5 10.3 2.2

32.7 31.6 9.8 4.3 4.1 10 9.2

38.5

6.4 2.8 10.1 5.5

19.7 19.7 22.3 11.3 7.7 5.2

34.1 23.9 11.8 5 6.2 4.7 0.7

22.1 37.4 12.2 1.3 4.9 8.7

17.5 29.2 10

10.2 2.9

40 43.3

3.3 1.7

32.3 30.8 10.8

2.3

37.4 19.5 9.8 3.3 2.8 4.9

29.4 23.5

2.9

24.5 23.2 12

13.1

26.8 24.9 12 1.6 4.1 8.5

29.7 6.5 26.3 0.1 4.6

18.7 27.4 9.5 2.3 3.6 9.3 1.5

21.6 0.3 10.7 4.9 9.3 4.4

40.9

4.5 2.3

31.6

8.1

8.5

2.2 1.4 2.2

1.1 0.5 0.5

41 37 36 28 37 23 10

= Top Quartile Performance per Identified CCMR Option

IEP NON-CTE

94

89

82.2

65.8

76

71.6

71.5

76.6

66.3

69.8

68.6

59.9

64.3

64.1

2.6 50.5

0.7 58.9

59.7

43.1

0.4 54.1

55.5

50

54.4

52.2

45.9

2

46.9

0.1 48.1

48.7

5.4 43.3

50

49.2

48

47.1

36.1

43.2

40

39.7

33.3

40.9

33.1

5

0.5 2.7

7

CCMR

RAW SCALED

95 99

93 98

82 96

79 95

77 94

75 94

74 94

77 94

70 93

71 93

71 93

67 92

68 92

67 92

66 92

63 91

64 91

65 91

60 90

59 89

58 88

57 86

56 85

56 85

55 83

54 82

54 82

54 82

52 79

52 79

51 78

50 78

49 77

47 76

45 74

43 73

43 73

43 73

42 72

5

60

3

52

CCMR Letter Grade

A+ A+ A A A A A A A- A- A- A- A- A- A- A- A- A- A- B+ B+ B B B B- B- B- B- C+ C+ C+ C+ C+ C C C- C- C- C- D- F-

Division of Instructional Leadership, School Improvement, and College Readiness Support

 ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download