Optional End-of-Year Summative Rating Form - TNTP



Optional End-of-Year Summative Rating FormSCHOOL: SUMMATIVE EVALUATOR: ___________TEACHER: GRADE/SUBJECT: ________ DATE: ________________________ Note:Prior to the end-of-year summative conference, evaluators should complete this form based on information collected and assessed throughout the year. A copy should be given to the teacher for discussion during the end-of-year summative conference. For more information on the Student Learning Objectives component of this form, see the Student Learning Objectives Handbook.Teacher Effectiveness Rubric ScoringNumber of Formal Observations: _________Number if Informal Observations: _________Domain 1: PlanningCompetencyRatingFinal Assessment of Domain 1 Utilize Assessment Data to PlanSet Ambitious and Measurable Achievement GoalsDevelop Standards-Based Unit Plans and AssessmentsCreate Objective-Driven Lesson Plans and AssessmentsTrack Student Data and Analyze Progress1.1: _______1.2: _______1.3: _______1.4: _______1.5: _______Final Rating (Circle One)4 – High. Eff. 3 – Eff. 2- Improv. Nec 1 – Ineff. Domain 2: InstructionCompetency RatingFinal Assessment of Domain 2Develop Student Understanding and Mastery of Lesson ObjectivesDemonstrate and Clearly Communicate Content Knowledge to StudentsEngage Students in Academic ContentCheck for UnderstandingModify Instruction as NeededDevelop Higher Level Understanding Through Rigorous Instruction and WorkMaximize Instructional TimeCreate Classroom Culture of Respect and CollaborationSet High Expectations for Academic Success2.1: ________2.2: ________2.3: ________2.4: ________2.5: ________2.6: ________2.7: ________2.8: ________2.9: ________Final Rating (Circle One)4 – High. Eff. 3 – Eff. 2- Improv. Nec 1 – Ineff. Domain 3: LeadershipCompetency RatingFinal Assessment of Domain 3Contribute to School CultureCollaborate with PeersSeek Professional Skills and KnowledgeAdvocate for Student SuccessEngage Families in Student Learning3.1: ________3.2: ________3.1: ________3.4: ________3.5: ________Final Rating (Circle One)4 – High. Eff. 3 – Eff. 2- Improv. Nec 1 – Ineff. Domains 1-3 Weighted ScoresDomainRating (1-4)WeightWeighted RatingDomain 110%Domain 275%Domain 315%Final Score for Domains 1-3:Follow the following formula to calculate by hand:Rating * % Weight = Weighted RatingSum of Weighted Ratings = Final Score for Domains 1-3Final Teacher Effectiveness Rubric Score, Domains 1-3: __________Domain 4: ProfessionalismFinal Assessment of Domain 4AttendanceOn-Time ArrivalPolicies and ProceduresRespectFinal Rating (Circle One)Meets Standards Does Not Meet StandardsFinal Teacher Effectiveness Rubric ScoreDirections: If the teacher “Meets Standards” above, deduct 0 points. The final Teacher Effectiveness Rubric score remains the same as in the previous step. If the teacher “Does Not Meet Standards”, deduct 1 point from the score calculated in the previous step.Final Teacher Effectiveness Rubric Score: ________Student Learning ObjectivesClass ObjectiveHighly Effective (4)Effective (3)Improvement Necessary (2)Ineffective (1)What was the teacher’s Class Learning Objective?Content Mastery StandardNumber of Students Who Achieved MasteryNumber of Students in CoursePercentage of Students Who Achieved MasteryWere there any important changes to the population of students in the targeted class (e.g., attendance problems, significant issues/changes to specific students) that you considered when rating the class objective? If so, state them below.Ineffective Improvement Necessary Effective Highly EffectiveBased on the above table, the teacher’s Class Student Learning Objective, and your professional judgment, indicate the appropriate performance levelTargeted ObjectiveTargeted Learning ObjectiveWhat was the teacher’s Targeted Objective Learning Goal for the targeted students?Did the teacher meet this objective?Met Objective Did Not Meet ObjectiveWhat evidence did you use to determine whether the teacher “surpassed goal or otherwise demonstrated outstanding student mastery or progress?”Ineffective Improvement Necessary Effective Highly EffectiveBased on the teacher’s Targeted Student Learning Objective, the evidence discussed above, and your professional judgment, indicate the appropriate performance level:Student Learning Objectives Weighted ScoresObjectiveRating (1-4)WeightWeighted RatingClass50%Targeted50%Final Student Learning Objectives Score:Follow the following formula to calculate by hand:Rating * % Weight = Weighted RatingSum of Weighted Ratings = Final Student Learning Objectives ScoreFinal Student Learning Objectives Score: __________Final Summative RatingCircle the group to which the teacher belongs. Then use the appropriate weights to calculate the final rating:Group 1Group 2Group 3Choose only one set of weightsMeasureRating (1-4)GROUP 1 WeightsGROUP 2 WeightsGROUP 3 WeightsWeighted RatingTeacher Effectiveness Rubric50%60%75%Indiana Growth Model35%20%---Student Learning Objectives10%15%20%School-wide Learning Measure*5%5%5%Final Summative Score: * All teachers in the same school should have the same rating on this measureFollow the following formula to calculate by hand:Rating * % Weight = Weighted RatingSum of Weighted Ratings = Final Summative ScoreFinal Summative Evaluation Score: _____________________Use the chart below and the Final Summative Evaluation Score to determine the teacher’s final rating.Final Summative Rating: IneffectiveImprovement NecessaryEffectiveHighly EffectiveTeacher SignatureI have met with my evaluator to discuss the information on this form and have received a copy.Signature: _________________________________________Date: ___________________Evaluator SignatureI have met with this teacher to discuss the information on this form and provided a copy.Signature: __________________________________________Date: ___________________ ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download