Maureen McPadden v. Wal-Mart 14-cv-475-SM 9/16/16

particular, Joseph Certo) acted with the requisite malice or reckless indifference to McPadden’s federally protected rights. See generally McDonough v. City of Quincy, 452 F.3d 8, 23 (1st Cir. 2006) (“[A] finding of intentional discrimination, which is the basis for a compensatory damages award, does not by itself ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download