Speech Evaluation Worksheet - Grantham University
Speech Evaluation WorksheetThis assessment mechanism is the tool you will use to provide feedback to your peers in the discussion forum. It is also available to you to use as a mechanism of self-assessment. Before uploading your first and final drafts, be sure to measure your work against all of the criteria here, in addition to the rubric for the speech. After reviewing the speech at least two times before completing this chart, you will put an “x” in the yes, no, or a little bit column; then, in the “comments” box, you should comment on performance. You will provide at least 2 sentences in each comment row, even if the speaker did well in that category. After you have completed the outline, in the Evaluative Summary portion, you should give an overall summary of the organization of this talk. Was it easy to follow? What could be improved? You will upload this documents as an attachment in the discussion board for the peer you evaluated. In the text area, copy and paste the overall evaluative feedback section (the very last step on the bottom of this chart). Topics and QuestionsYesNo SomewhatComments on Success or areas for improvement IntroDid the introduction gain attention, create goodwill, set the tone, build credibility, and lead into the speech (with a preview/transition/etc.)?Was the goal of the speech clear? ContentWere the main points meaningful, well-organized, and coherent? Did the speaker have high quality information (i.e., scholarly sources that were well cited)?Did the transitions lead smoothly from one point to another?Did the speaker keep the audience in mind throughout the entire speech, adapting their topic to the audience’s interests, knowledge, and attitudes?Was the topic and delivery appropriate to the type of speech (i.e., was it appropriately informative or persuasive)? Conclusion Did the conclusion tie the speech together, summarize main points, and end on a high note? DeliveryWas language clear, vivid, professional, and appropriate? Did the speaker sound enthusiastic?Did the speaker seem well-prepared?Did the speaker make and maintain eye contact? Was the recording environment professional?Did the speaker back away from the camera so that enough of their body could be seen while standing? Did the speaker use gestures, movement, and other appropriate forms of nonverbal delivery? Did the speaker use appropriate visual aids? Overall Feedback:Be sure to copy/paste the overall feedback into the discussion forum for the peer you are evaluating; please also be sure to upload (as an attachment) the entire document above. ................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
- speech evaluation worksheet grantham university
- discipleship an imperative to the ministry of baseball
- 6th grade reading writing argumentative texts unit
- evaluating digital information the teacher s guide
- gcse english language unit 2 speaking and listening
- pastor search committee workbook
- ela grade 11 persuasion and argument model curriculum
- identifying rhetorical strategies logos pathos and ethos
- scope and sequence
Related searches
- speech and language evaluation checklist
- self evaluation worksheet pdf
- speech and language evaluation tests
- speech therapy evaluation tests
- speech and language evaluation sample
- speech and language evaluation code
- speech therapy evaluation tools
- speech language evaluation tests
- speech language evaluation form
- speech language evaluation pdf
- speech therapy evaluation form
- speech therapy evaluation for adults